• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
On finding one's way: a comment on Bock et al. (2024).找到出路:对 Bock 等人(2024 年)的评论。
Psychol Res. 2024 Oct;88(7):2172-2179. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02011-1. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
The structure of cognitive strategies for wayfinding decisions.寻路决策的认知策略结构。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):476-486. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01863-3. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
3
Understanding Differences in Wayfinding Strategies.理解寻路策略的差异。
Top Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;15(1):102-119. doi: 10.1111/tops.12592. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
4
Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from Mauritanian Coral Mounds.来自毛里塔尼亚珊瑚丘的水螅虫纲动物(刺胞动物门,水螅虫纲)。
Zootaxa. 2020 Nov 16;4878(3):zootaxa.4878.3.2. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4878.3.2.
5
A Narrative Review of Theories of Wayfinding Within the Interior Environment.室内环境中寻路理论的叙述性综述
HERD. 2021 Jan;14(1):290-303. doi: 10.1177/1937586720932276. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
6
Childhood wayfinding experience explains sex and individual differences in adult wayfinding strategy and anxiety.儿童寻路经验解释了成年寻路策略和焦虑的性别和个体差异。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Mar 17;5(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00220-x.
7
Odors Can Serve as Landmarks in Human Wayfinding.气味可作为人类寻路中的地标。
Cogn Sci. 2019 Nov;43(11):e12798. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12798.
8
Gender differences in spatial navigation: Characterizing wayfinding behaviors.性别差异在空间导航中的体现:寻路行为的特征。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1933-1940. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01659-w.
9
Who gets lost and why: A representative cross-sectional survey on sociodemographic and vestibular determinants of wayfinding strategies.谁会迷路以及为什么迷路:一项关于定向策略的社会人口学和前庭决定因素的代表性横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0204781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204781. eCollection 2019.
10
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Linear and Nonlinear Pedagogical Approaches in Team-Invasion Ball Sports: A Systematic Review.线性和非线性教学方法在团队入侵式球类运动中的有效性:一项系统综述
Sports Med Open. 2025 Aug 4;11(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00893-y.

本文引用的文献

1
The structure of cognitive strategies for wayfinding decisions.寻路决策的认知策略结构。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):476-486. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01863-3. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
Wayfinding: How Ecological Perspectives of Navigating Dynamic Environments Can Enrich Our Understanding of the Learner and the Learning Process in Sport.寻路:动态环境导航的生态学视角如何丰富我们对体育学习者及学习过程的理解
Sports Med Open. 2020 Oct 28;6(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40798-020-00280-9.
3
Philosophy for the rest of cognitive science.认知科学其他领域的哲学
Top Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;3(2):425-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01143.x.
4
Changes in practice task constraints shape decision-making behaviours of team games players.实践任务约束的变化塑造了团队游戏玩家的决策行为。
J Sci Med Sport. 2012 May;15(3):244-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
5
Studies in spatial learning: Orientation and the short-cut.空间学习研究:定向与捷径
J Exp Psychol. 1946 Feb;36:13-24. doi: 10.1037/h0053944.
6
Beyond core knowledge: Natural geometry.超越核心知识:自然几何学。
Cogn Sci. 2010 May 1;34(5):863-884. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01110.x.
7
The concept of 'Organismic Asymmetry' in sport science.运动科学中的“有机不对称”概念。
J Sci Med Sport. 2010 Nov;13(6):633-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
8
Cognitive maps in rats and men.大鼠和人类的认知地图。
Psychol Rev. 1948 Jul;55(4):189-208. doi: 10.1037/h0061626.
9
The dynamics of perception and action.感知与行动的动态变化。
Psychol Rev. 2006 Apr;113(2):358-89. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358.
10
Cognition: the view from ecological realism.认知:来自生态现实主义的视角。
Cognition. 1981 Aug-Dec;10(1-3):313-21. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(81)90063-9.

找到出路:对 Bock 等人(2024 年)的评论。

On finding one's way: a comment on Bock et al. (2024).

机构信息

Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.

Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, CIPER, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2024 Oct;88(7):2172-2179. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02011-1. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-024-02011-1
PMID:39052102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11449947/
Abstract

In a recent issue of Psychological Research, Bock, O., Huang, J-Y., Onur, O. A., & Memmert, D. (2024). The structure of cognitive strategies for wayfinding decisions. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 88, 476-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01863-3 .) investigated cognitive strategies purported to guide wayfinding decisions at intersections. Following experimentation in a virtualised maze, it was concluded that intersectional wayfinding decisions were based on a 'generalized cognitive process', in addition to 'strategy-specific' processes. The aim of our comment is not to challenge these findings or their methodological rigour. Rather, we note how the study of human wayfinding has been undertaken from entirely different metatheoretical perspectives in psychological science. Leaning on the seminal work of James Gibson and Harry Heft, we consider wayfinding as a continuous, integrated perception-action process, distributed across the entire organism-environment system. Such a systems-oriented, ecological approach to wayfinding remediates the organismic asymmetry pervasive to extant theories of human behaviours, foregrounding the possibility for empirical investigation that takes seriously the socio-cultural contexts in which inhabitants dwell.

摘要

在最近一期的《心理研究》杂志上,Bock、O.、Huang、J-Y.、Onur、O. A. 和 Memmert、D.(2024)研究了被认为可以指导在十字路口做出寻路决策的认知策略的结构。在虚拟迷宫中的实验之后,得出的结论是,十字路口的寻路决策是基于“广义认知过程”,除了“策略特定”的过程。我们的评论目的不是质疑这些发现或其方法的严谨性。相反,我们注意到人类寻路的研究在心理学科学中是从完全不同的元理论角度进行的。借鉴詹姆斯·吉布森和哈里·赫夫特的开创性工作,我们将寻路视为一个连续的、综合的感知-行动过程,分布在整个生物体-环境系统中。这种面向系统的生态方法纠正了现存人类行为理论中普遍存在的生物体不对称性,突出了实证研究的可能性,这些研究认真对待居民居住的社会文化背景。