Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, CIPER, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada, Lisbon, Portugal.
Psychol Res. 2024 Oct;88(7):2172-2179. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02011-1. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
In a recent issue of Psychological Research, Bock, O., Huang, J-Y., Onur, O. A., & Memmert, D. (2024). The structure of cognitive strategies for wayfinding decisions. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 88, 476-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01863-3 .) investigated cognitive strategies purported to guide wayfinding decisions at intersections. Following experimentation in a virtualised maze, it was concluded that intersectional wayfinding decisions were based on a 'generalized cognitive process', in addition to 'strategy-specific' processes. The aim of our comment is not to challenge these findings or their methodological rigour. Rather, we note how the study of human wayfinding has been undertaken from entirely different metatheoretical perspectives in psychological science. Leaning on the seminal work of James Gibson and Harry Heft, we consider wayfinding as a continuous, integrated perception-action process, distributed across the entire organism-environment system. Such a systems-oriented, ecological approach to wayfinding remediates the organismic asymmetry pervasive to extant theories of human behaviours, foregrounding the possibility for empirical investigation that takes seriously the socio-cultural contexts in which inhabitants dwell.
在最近一期的《心理研究》杂志上,Bock、O.、Huang、J-Y.、Onur、O. A. 和 Memmert、D.(2024)研究了被认为可以指导在十字路口做出寻路决策的认知策略的结构。在虚拟迷宫中的实验之后,得出的结论是,十字路口的寻路决策是基于“广义认知过程”,除了“策略特定”的过程。我们的评论目的不是质疑这些发现或其方法的严谨性。相反,我们注意到人类寻路的研究在心理学科学中是从完全不同的元理论角度进行的。借鉴詹姆斯·吉布森和哈里·赫夫特的开创性工作,我们将寻路视为一个连续的、综合的感知-行动过程,分布在整个生物体-环境系统中。这种面向系统的生态方法纠正了现存人类行为理论中普遍存在的生物体不对称性,突出了实证研究的可能性,这些研究认真对待居民居住的社会文化背景。