Naftali Jonathan, Tsur Gal, Auriel Eitan, Raphaeli Guy, Findler Michael, Brauner Ran, Perlow Alain, Keret Ophir, Barnea Rani
Department of Neurology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jul 25:15910199241264326. doi: 10.1177/15910199241264326.
Delays in reperfusion treatment, both intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT), adversely affect outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). To alleviate these delays, it is essential to comprehend how patients' baseline and stroke characteristics impact in-hospital reperfusion delays. While demographic and socioeconomic factors affect stroke outcomes, their impact on in-hospital delays remains unclear.
This is retrospective analysis at a tertiary stroke center, encompassing AIS patients receiving IVT and / or EVT between 2019 and 2022 (re-canalization cohort). Outcomes of interest were time intervals of admission to CT and admission to recanalization. Univariable analyses explored age, gender, baseline functional status, socioeconomic status (SES), ethnicity, vascular risk factors, and stroke characteristics. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.
Altogether, 313 patients treated with IVT and 293 with EVT were included in the re-canalization cohort. No demographic variables were found to be associated with stroke treatment time intervals. Following multivariable analysis, stroke severity (low NIHSS, < 0.01), arrival to the hospital by other means than ambulance ( < 0.01), and atypical stroke symptoms ( < 0.01), were associated with in-hospital delays, both in the EVT and the IVT groups.
Our findings indicate that patients with a more severe ischemic stroke, typical stroke symptoms, and arrival by ambulance have shorter stroke treatment time intervals. These results emphasize that, in atypical cases, even a lower suspicion of stroke should promote urgent workup for stroke diagnosis. Our findings do not indicate any influence of demographic or SES on in-hospital reperfusion delays.
再灌注治疗延迟,包括静脉溶栓(IVT)和血管内治疗(EVT),对急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的预后产生不利影响。为了缓解这些延迟,了解患者的基线特征和卒中特点如何影响住院再灌注延迟至关重要。虽然人口统计学和社会经济因素会影响卒中预后,但其对住院延迟的影响尚不清楚。
这是一项在三级卒中中心进行的回顾性分析,纳入了2019年至2022年间接受IVT和/或EVT的AIS患者(再通队列)。感兴趣的结局是入院至CT检查的时间间隔和入院至再通的时间间隔。单因素分析探讨了年龄、性别、基线功能状态、社会经济地位(SES)、种族、血管危险因素和卒中特点。随后进行了多因素逻辑回归分析。
再通队列共纳入313例接受IVT治疗的患者和293例接受EVT治疗的患者。未发现任何人口统计学变量与卒中治疗时间间隔相关。多因素分析后发现,卒中严重程度(低美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表[NIHSS]评分,<0.01)、非救护车送医(<0.01)和非典型卒中症状(<0.01),在EVT组和IVT组中均与住院延迟相关。
我们的研究结果表明,缺血性卒中更严重、有典型卒中症状且由救护车送医的患者,其卒中治疗时间间隔更短。这些结果强调,在非典型病例中,即使对卒中的怀疑程度较低,也应促使进行紧急的卒中诊断检查。我们的研究结果未显示人口统计学或SES对住院再灌注延迟有任何影响。