Quispe-López Norberto, Guadilla Yasmina, Gómez-Polo Cristina, López-Valverde Nansi, Flores-Fraile Javier, Montero Javier
Department of Surgery. Faculty of Medicine, Dental clinic. University of Salamanca. Campus Miguel de Unamuno. PC: 37007. Spain.
J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105264. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105264. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
To evaluate the bone changes around equicrestal and subcrestal implants, analyzing the effect of abutment height [short abutments (SA < 2 mm) and long abutments (LA > 2 mm)] and the three components of the peri‑implant soft-tissue phenotype.
Twenty-six patients received 71 implants that were placed according to supracrestal tissue height (STH) in an equicrestal (n = 17), shallow subcrestal ≈1 mm (n = 33), or deep subcrestal ≈2 mm (n = 21) position. After 3 months of healing, rehabilitation was completed using metal-ceramic crowns on multi-unit abutments of 1.5 mm, 2.5 mm, or 3.5 mm in height, depending on the prosthetic space and STH. Longitudinal clinical parameters (STH, mucosal thickness, and keratinized mucosa width) and radiographic data [bone remodelling and marginal bone loss (MBL)] were collected at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postsurgery.
The gain in STH was significantly greater around the implants placed in a subcrestal ≈2 mm position. After 2 years, the mean change in bone remodelling in the SA group was significantly greater than in the LA group. According to the multiple linear regression, bone remodelling depends primarily on abutment height (β = -0.43), followed by crestal position (β = 0.34), and keratinized mucosa width (β = -0.22), while MBL depends on abutment height (β = -0.37), and the patient's age (β = -0.36).
Implants placed in an equicrestal or subcrestal ≈1 mm position with LA undergo less bone remodelling, while the lowest level of MBL occurs in subcrestal ≈2 mm implants with LA. Differing soft-tissue thicknesses combined with the use of either SA or LA produced significant intergroup differences in bone remodelling and MBL.
Abutment height is the most powerful predictor variable affecting bone remodelling and MBL. Depending on the dimensions of the peri‑implant soft-tissue phenotype, placing the implants subcrestally may also be a viable option to decrease bone remodelling and, consequently, reduce MBL.
identification number: NCT05670340.
评估平齐龈缘种植体和龈下种植体周围的骨变化,分析基台高度[短基台(SA < 2 mm)和长基台(LA > 2 mm)]以及种植体周围软组织表型的三个组成部分的影响。
26例患者接受了71颗种植体,根据龈上组织高度(STH)将种植体分别植入平齐龈缘位置(n = 17)、浅龈下约1 mm位置(n = 33)或深龈下约2 mm位置(n = 21)。愈合3个月后,根据修复间隙和STH,使用高度为1.5 mm、2.5 mm或3.5 mm的多单位基台上的金属烤瓷冠完成修复。在术后3、6、12和24个月收集纵向临床参数(STH、黏膜厚度和角化黏膜宽度)和影像学数据[骨重塑和边缘骨吸收(MBL)]。
植入龈下约2 mm位置的种植体周围STH的增加明显更大。2年后,SA组的骨重塑平均变化明显大于LA组。根据多元线性回归分析,骨重塑主要取决于基台高度(β = -0.43),其次是嵴顶位置(β = 0.34)和角化黏膜宽度(β = -0.22),而MBL取决于基台高度(β = -0.37)和患者年龄(β = -0.36)。
使用LA的平齐龈缘或龈下约1 mm位置植入的种植体骨重塑较少,而使用LA的龈下约2 mm种植体的MBL水平最低。不同的软组织厚度与SA或LA的使用相结合,在骨重塑和MBL方面产生了显著的组间差异。
基台高度是影响骨重塑和MBL的最有力预测变量。根据种植体周围软组织表型的尺寸,将种植体植入龈下也可能是减少骨重塑从而降低MBL的可行选择。
识别号:NCT05670340。