Jivalagian Patelle, Gettel Cameron J, Smith Colin M, Robinson Leah, Brinker Morgan, Shah Dhruvil, Kumar Anusha, Faustino Isaac V, Nath Bidisha, Chang-Sing Erika, Taylor R Andrew, Kennedy Maura, Hwang Ula, Wong Ambrose H
Department of Emergency Medicine (PJ, CJG, LR, DS, AK, IVF, BN, ECS, RAT, AHW), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health (CMS), Duke University, Durham, NC.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;33(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
Older adults may present to the emergency department (ED) with agitation, a symptom often resulting in chemical sedation and physical restraint use which carry significant risks and side effects for the geriatric population. To date, limited literature describes the patterns of differential restraint use in this population.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used electronic health records data from ED visits by older adults (age ≥65 years) ranging 2015-2022 across nine hospital sites in a regional hospital network. Logistic regression models were estimated to determine the association between patient-level characteristics and the primary outcomes of chemical sedation and physical restraint.
Among 872,587 ED visits during the study period, 11,875 (1.4%) and 32,658 (3.7%) encounters involved the use of chemical sedation and physical restraints respectively. The populations aged 75-84, 85-94, 95+ years had increasingly higher odds of chemical sedation [adjusted odds ratios (AORs) 1.35 (95% CI 1.29-1.42); 1.82 (1.73-1.91); 2.35 (2.15-2.57) respectively] as well as physical restraint compared to the 65-74 group [AOR 1.31 (1.27-1.34); 1.55 (1.50-1.60); 1.69 (1.59-1.79)]. Compared to the White Non-Hispanic group, the Black Non-Hispanic and Hispanic/Latinx groups had significantly higher odds of chemical sedation [AOR 1.26 (1.18-1.35); AOR 1.22 (1.15-1.29)] and physical restraint [AOR 1.12 (95% CI 1.07-1.16); 1.22 (1.18-1.26)].
Approximately one in 20 ED visits among older adults resulted in chemical sedation or physical restraint use. Minoritized group status was associated with increasing use of chemical sedation and physical restraint, particularly among the oldest old. These results may indicate the need for further research in agitation management for historically marginalized populations in older adults.
老年人可能因躁动不安而前往急诊科就诊,这种症状常常导致使用化学镇静剂和身体约束措施,而这些措施对老年人群体具有重大风险和副作用。迄今为止,仅有有限的文献描述了该人群中不同约束措施使用的模式。
设计、地点、参与者及测量方法:这项回顾性横断面研究使用了来自一个地区医院网络中九家医院2015 - 2022年期间老年人(年龄≥65岁)急诊科就诊的电子健康记录数据。估计逻辑回归模型以确定患者层面特征与化学镇静和身体约束的主要结局之间的关联。
在研究期间的872,587次急诊科就诊中,分别有11,875次(1.4%)和32,658次(3.7%)就诊涉及使用化学镇静剂和身体约束措施。与65 - 74岁组相比,75 - 84岁、85 - 94岁、95岁及以上人群使用化学镇静剂的几率越来越高[调整后的优势比(AOR)分别为1.35(95%置信区间1.29 - 1.42);1.82(1.73 - 1.91);2.35(2.15 - 2.57)],使用身体约束措施的几率也更高[AOR分别为1.31(1.27 - 1.34);1.55(1.50 - 1.60);1.69(1.59 - 1.79)]。与非西班牙裔白人组相比,非西班牙裔黑人组和西班牙裔/拉丁裔组使用化学镇静剂的几率显著更高[AOR分别为1.26(1.18 - 1.35);AOR为1.22(1.15 - 1.29)],使用身体约束措施的几率也更高[AOR分别为1.12(95%置信区间1.07 - 1.16);1.22(1.18 - 1.26)]。
老年人中约每20次急诊科就诊就有一次导致使用化学镇静剂或身体约束措施。少数族裔群体状态与化学镇静剂和身体约束措施使用的增加有关,尤其是在年龄最大的老年人中。这些结果可能表明需要对老年人中历史上被边缘化人群的躁动管理进行进一步研究。