• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征中短期 DAPT 后 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Via Corriera 1, 48033, Cotignola, Italy.

Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico ‛Rodolico-San Marco', University of Catania, 95100, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024 Nov 6;10(7):588-598. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae057.

DOI:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae057
PMID:39054275
Abstract

BACKGROUND

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may balance ischaemic and bleeding risks in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it remains uncertain how different P2Y12 inhibitors used as monotherapy affect outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Randomized controlled trials comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT (≤3 months) vs. 12-month DAPT in ACS were included. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). All analyses included an interaction term for the P2Y12 inhibitor used as monotherapy. Trial sequential analyses were run to explore whether the effect estimate of each outcome may be affected by further studies. Seven trials encompassing 27 284 ACS patients were included. Compared with 12-month DAPT, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT was associated with no difference in MACE [odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.12] and a significant reduction in net adverse clinical events (NACE) (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94), any bleeding (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.66), and major bleeding (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37-0.60). Significant interactions for subgroup difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel monotherapy were found for MACE (Pint = 0.016), all-cause death (Pint = 0.042), NACE (Pint = 0.018), and myocardial infarction (Pint = 0.028). Trial sequential analysis showed conclusive evidence of improved NACE with ticagrelor, but not with clopidogrel monotherapy, compared with standard DAPT.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ACS, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT halves bleeding without increasing ischaemic events compared with standard DAPT. Ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel monotherapy, reduced MACE, NACE, and mortality compared with standard DAPT, supporting its use after aspirin discontinuation.

摘要

背景

在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者中,双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)后短期应用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗可能平衡缺血和出血风险。然而,不同 P2Y12 抑制剂作为单药治疗的效果仍不确定。

方法和结果

纳入比较 DAPT(≤3 个月)后 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与 ACS 12 个月 DAPT的随机对照试验。主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。所有分析均包含作为单药治疗的 P2Y12 抑制剂的交互项。进行试验序贯分析以探讨每个结局的效应估计是否可能受到进一步研究的影响。纳入 7 项试验共 27284 例 ACS 患者。与 12 个月 DAPT 相比,DAPT 后短期应用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与 MACE 无差异[比值比(OR)0.92,95%置信区间(CI)0.76-1.12]和净不良临床事件(NACE)显著减少(OR 0.75;95%CI 0.60-0.94)、任何出血(OR 0.54,95%CI 0.43-0.66)和大出血(OR 0.47,95%CI 0.37-0.60)。替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷单药治疗的亚组差异的交互作用有统计学意义,包括 MACE(Pint=0.016)、全因死亡(Pint=0.042)、NACE(Pint=0.018)和心肌梗死(Pint=0.028)。试验序贯分析显示,与标准 DAPT 相比,替格瑞洛单药治疗可显著改善 NACE,而氯吡格雷单药治疗则无显著改善。

结论

在 ACS 患者中,与标准 DAPT 相比,DAPT 后短期应用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗可将出血减半而不增加缺血事件。与标准 DAPT 相比,替格瑞洛而非氯吡格雷单药治疗可降低 MACE、NACE 和死亡率,支持其在阿司匹林停药后应用。

相似文献

1
P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征中短期 DAPT 后 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024 Nov 6;10(7):588-598. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae057.
2
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
3
Ticagrelor monotherapy for acute coronary syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis of TICO and T-PASS trials.替格瑞洛单药治疗急性冠脉综合征:TICO 和 T-PASS 试验的个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 1;45(33):3045-3056. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae249.
4
De-escalation to ticagrelor monotherapy versus 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with and without acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials.在有和没有急性冠脉综合征的患者中,从双联抗血小板治疗降级为替格瑞洛单药治疗与继续双联抗血小板治疗 12 个月:一项随机试验的系统评价和个体患者水平荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 7;404(10456):937-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01616-7. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
5
Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷单药治疗与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗:系统评价和患者水平荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 May 1;9(5):437-448. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0133.
6
Long versus short dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor and coronary revascularization: Insights from the RENAMI registry.接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中长程与短程双联抗血小板治疗与冠状动脉血运重建:来自 RENAMI 注册研究的结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 May;27(7):696-705. doi: 10.1177/2047487319836327. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
7
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After a Short Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Standard-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary Meta-Analysis.短程双联抗血小板治疗后应用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与标准双联抗血小板治疗用于行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的比较:一项当代荟萃分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Sep;40(9):799-808. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00947-x.
8
Pooled Analysis of Bleeding, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, and All-Cause Mortality in Clinical Trials of Time-Constrained Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后限时双重抗血小板治疗临床试验中出血、主要不良心血管事件和全因死亡率的汇总分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 18;9(16):e017109. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017109. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
9
Ticagrelor monotherapy after short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy compared to continued dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: an updated meta-analysis.替格瑞洛单药治疗与继续双联抗血小板治疗在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Coron Artery Dis. 2024 Nov 1;35(7):590-597. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001417. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
10
P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary revascularisation: individual patient level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.冠状动脉血运重建术后P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗或双联抗血小板治疗:随机对照试验的个体患者水平荟萃分析
BMJ. 2021 Jun 16;373:n1332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1332.

引用本文的文献

1
Antiplatelet Monotherapies for Long-Term Secondary Prevention Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后长期二级预防的抗血小板单药治疗
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 6;14(15):5536. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155536.
2
Advances in the Detection and Management of Vulnerable Coronary Plaques.易损冠状动脉斑块的检测与管理进展
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug;18(8):e015529. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015529. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
3
Effectiveness of clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor based on the ABCD-GENE score in acute coronary syndrome patients following percutaneous coronary intervention.
基于ABCD-GENE评分比较氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的有效性。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 11;16:1606327. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1606327. eCollection 2025.
4
Entering a new era of antiplatelet therapy: the 4D-ACS trial.步入抗血小板治疗新时代:4D-ACS试验
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 Aug 12;11(5):402. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf045.
5
Tailoring dual antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention: a meta-analysis of timing, duration, regimen, and stroke subtypes.为预防卒中量身定制双重抗血小板治疗:时间、疗程、方案及卒中亚型的荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 24;16:1516402. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1516402. eCollection 2025.
6
Long-term antiplatelet monotherapy after PCI: searching for the smart choice.PCI术后的长期抗血小板单药治疗:寻找明智之选。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 Jul 7;11(4):322. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf032.
7
Ultrashort Versus 1-Year Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后超短期与1年双联抗血小板治疗:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Feb 18;4(2):102496. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102496. eCollection 2025 Feb.
8
CLEAR results, cloudy impact: colchicine's neutral role in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.结果明确,影响模糊:秋水仙碱在ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的中性作用
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 May 2;11(3):215-217. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf011.
9
AZALEA-TIMI 71 trial: less bleeding with abelacimab compared to rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation, but stroke prevention is uncertain.杜鹃花-TIMI 71试验:在心房颤动中,与利伐沙班相比,阿贝西单抗导致的出血更少,但预防中风的效果尚不确定。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 May 2;11(3):213-214. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf008.
10
Aspirin in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: a true clinical issue?葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症患者使用阿司匹林:一个真正的临床问题?
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 Mar 13;11(2):112-113. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae101.