• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛单药治疗与继续双联抗血小板治疗在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。

Ticagrelor monotherapy after short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy compared to continued dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: an updated meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, GCS Medical College and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India.

Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2024 Nov 1;35(7):590-597. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001417. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000001417
PMID:39171570
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimum duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains controversial. Ticagrelor monotherapy after short duration of DAPT (1-3 months) is a subject of research. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the ticagrelor monotherapy with continued DAPT after short duration of DAPT in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies comparing ticagrelor monotherapy to DAPT after PCI and reported the outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE); net adverse clinical events (NACE); myocardial infarction (MI); major bleeding; death from any cause; definite or probable stent thrombosis; and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Data were extracted from published reports and quality assessment was performed per Cochrane recommendations. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (Cochrane collaboration). Heterogeneity was examined with I2 test.

RESULTS

Of 3,208 results, five studies with 21,407 patients were included of which 50% received ticagrelor monotherapy. Studies had reported follow up of 12 months. Major bleeding [hazard ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.61; P  < 0.001], NACE (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.90; P  = 0.005), and all-cause death (hazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P  = 0.04) were significantly less with ticagrelor monotherapy. Other outcomes were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, ticagrelor monotherapy reduces major bleeding, NACE and all-cause death as compared to continued DAPT for 12 months. Major ischemic outcomes were similar. Ticagrelor monotherapy is the way forward after short duration of DAPT after PCI in ACS.

摘要

背景

急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的最佳持续时间仍存在争议。DAPT 持续时间较短(1-3 个月)后使用替格瑞洛单药治疗是研究的主题。我们进行了一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,比较了 ACS 患者 PCI 后短期 DAPT 后替格瑞洛单药治疗与继续 DAPT 的疗效。

方法

检索 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库,比较 PCI 后替格瑞洛单药治疗与 DAPT 的研究,并报告主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE);净不良临床事件(NACE);心肌梗死(MI);主要出血;任何原因死亡;确定或可能的支架血栓形成;以及靶血管血运重建(TVR)的结果。从已发表的报告中提取数据,并按照 Cochrane 建议进行质量评估。使用 Review Manager(Cochrane 协作)进行统计分析。使用 I2 检验检查异质性。

结果

在 3208 项结果中,纳入了 5 项研究共 21407 例患者,其中 50%接受替格瑞洛单药治疗。研究报告了 12 个月的随访。主要出血[风险比 0.47;95%置信区间(CI),0.37-0.61;P <0.001]、NACE(风险比 0.71;95%CI,0.56-0.90;P =0.005)和全因死亡(风险比 0.76;95%CI,0.59-0.98;P =0.04)的风险显著降低。两组其他结局相当。

结论

在接受 PCI 的 ACS 患者中,与继续 DAPT 治疗 12 个月相比,替格瑞洛单药治疗可减少主要出血、NACE 和全因死亡。主要缺血结局相似。在 ACS 患者 PCI 后短期 DAPT 后,替格瑞洛单药治疗是一种可行的方法。

相似文献

1
Ticagrelor monotherapy after short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy compared to continued dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: an updated meta-analysis.替格瑞洛单药治疗与继续双联抗血小板治疗在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Coron Artery Dis. 2024 Nov 1;35(7):590-597. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001417. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤ 1-month DAPT vs continued DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.替格瑞洛单药治疗在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中与持续 DAPT 相比在≤1 个月后的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Dec;49(12):102868. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102868. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
3
De-escalating Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome : A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.急性冠状动脉综合征中双联抗血小板治疗降级为替格瑞洛单药治疗:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析
Ann Intern Med. 2025 Apr;178(4):533-542. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-03102. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
4
Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stenting in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架置入术后的短期双联抗血小板治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Dec 1;9(12):1094-1105. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3216.
5
Indobufen versus aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome.吲哚布芬与阿司匹林用于老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的比较
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04843-0.
6
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
7
Ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and high ischaemic risk: a post hoc analysis of the TWILIGHT trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林用于慢性冠状动脉综合征且缺血风险高的患者:TWILIGHT试验的事后分析
EuroIntervention. 2025 May 16;21(10):550-559. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00973.
8
Rationale and design of randomized non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor monotherapy with dual antiplatelet therapy in chronic coronary syndrome patients post percutaneous coronary intervention (TICALONE-TAHA10 Protocol).比较替格瑞洛单药治疗与双重抗血小板治疗在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后慢性冠状动脉综合征患者中的安全性和有效性的随机非劣效性临床试验的原理与设计(TICALONE-TAHA10方案)
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0325663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325663. eCollection 2025.
9
Efficacy and Safety of P2Y monotherapy vs standard DAPT in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: meta-analysis of randomized trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中 P2Y 单药治疗与标准 DAPT 的疗效和安全性:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Aug;49(8):102635. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102635. Epub 2024 May 13.
10
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with and without Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Apr 20;23(9):4549. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094549.