Universidad de Córdoba (Spain).
Psicothema. 2024 Aug;36(3):207-216. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2023.56.
Previous studies have identified the association between classroom social status and bullying victimization, but it remains unclear how different victimization trajectories relate separately to social status dimensions: preference (acceptance and rejection) and popularity (popular and unpopular), and whether there are differences between victimization trajectory groups. This study assumed a longitudinal approach to explore these research questions.
A total of 3.182 (50% girls; M = 12.55 years at wave 1) students participated in the study.
Four bullying victimization trajectory groups were found: high, decreasing, increasing and low in victimization. Multigroup analyses showed that high in victimization group had the worst acceptance, rejection, and unpopularity indexes. The decreasing victimization group increased in acceptance and popularity, whereas the increasing victimization group increased in rejection and popularity.
These results underline the importance of considering the different dimensions of social status and their association with victimization trajectories when anti-bullying programs are proposed.
先前的研究已经确定了课堂社会地位与欺凌受害之间的关联,但仍不清楚不同的受害轨迹如何分别与社会地位维度相关:偏好(接受和拒绝)和受欢迎程度(受欢迎和不受欢迎),以及受害轨迹群体之间是否存在差异。本研究采用纵向方法来探讨这些研究问题。
共有 3182 名(50%为女生;第 1 波时的平均年龄为 12.55 岁)学生参与了这项研究。
发现了四个欺凌受害轨迹群体:高、下降、上升和低受害。多组分析表明,高受害群体的接受、拒绝和不受欢迎指数最差。下降的受害群体在接受和受欢迎程度上有所增加,而上升的受害群体在拒绝和受欢迎程度上有所增加。
这些结果强调了在提出反欺凌计划时,考虑社会地位的不同维度及其与受害轨迹的关联的重要性。