• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于脱离接触的IRTree模型示例。

An Illustration of an IRTree Model for Disengagement.

作者信息

Leventhal Brian C, Pastor Dena

机构信息

James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Aug;84(4):810-834. doi: 10.1177/00131644231185533. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1177/00131644231185533
PMID:39055098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11268386/
Abstract

Low-stakes test performance commonly reflects examinee ability and effort. Examinees exhibiting low effort may be identified through rapid guessing behavior throughout an assessment. There has been a plethora of methods proposed to adjust scores once rapid guesses have been identified, but these have been plagued by strong assumptions or the removal of examinees. In this study, we illustrate how an IRTree model can be used to adjust examinee ability for rapid guessing behavior. Our approach is flexible as it does not assume independence between rapid guessing behavior and the trait of interest (e.g., ability) nor does it necessitate the removal of examinees who engage in rapid guessing. In addition, our method uniquely allows for the simultaneous modeling of a disengagement latent trait in addition to the trait of interest. The results indicate the model is quite useful for estimating individual differences among examinees in the disengagement latent trait and in providing more precise measurement of examinee ability relative to models ignoring rapid guesses or accommodating it in different ways. A simulation study reveals that our model results in less biased estimates of the trait of interest for individuals with rapid responses, regardless of sample size and rapid response rate in the sample. We conclude with a discussion of extensions of the model and directions for future research.

摘要

低风险测试成绩通常反映考生的能力和努力程度。在整个评估过程中,表现出低努力程度的考生可能会通过快速猜测行为被识别出来。一旦识别出快速猜测行为,已经提出了大量方法来调整分数,但这些方法一直受到强假设或剔除考生的困扰。在本研究中,我们说明了如何使用IRT树模型来针对快速猜测行为调整考生能力。我们的方法很灵活,因为它既不假设快速猜测行为与感兴趣的特质(如能力)之间存在独立性,也不要求剔除进行快速猜测的考生。此外,我们的方法独特地允许在对感兴趣的特质进行建模的同时,对脱离潜在特质进行建模。结果表明,该模型对于估计考生在脱离潜在特质方面的个体差异以及相对于忽略快速猜测或以不同方式适应快速猜测的模型而言,在提供更精确的考生能力测量方面非常有用。一项模拟研究表明,无论样本大小和样本中的快速反应率如何,我们的模型对于具有快速反应的个体在感兴趣特质的估计上偏差更小。我们最后讨论了模型的扩展以及未来研究的方向。

相似文献

1
An Illustration of an IRTree Model for Disengagement.用于脱离接触的IRTree模型示例。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Aug;84(4):810-834. doi: 10.1177/00131644231185533. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
3
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
8
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯妥英钠单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 27;2(2):CD001911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001911.pub3.
9
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
10
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯妥英单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 14(8):CD001911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001911.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
A cognitive diagnosis model for disengaged behaviors.一种针对脱离行为的认知诊断模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 1;57(8):213. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02734-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in the Speed-Ability Relation Through Different Treatments of Rapid Guessing.通过对快速猜测的不同处理方式,速度-能力关系的变化
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Jun;83(3):473-494. doi: 10.1177/00131644221109490. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
Application of a Longitudinal IRTree Model: Response Style Changes Over Time.纵向IRT树模型的应用:随时间变化的反应风格
Assessment. 2023 Mar;30(2):332-347. doi: 10.1177/10731911211042932. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
Modeling Changes in Response Style with Longitudinal IRTree Models.用纵向 IRTree 模型对反应风格的变化进行建模。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Sep-Oct;57(5):859-878. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1920361. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
4
Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Comparison of Two IRTree Models to Investigate the Impact of Full Versus Endpoint-Only Response Option Labeling.见林又见树:两种IRTree模型用于研究完整与仅终点响应选项标注影响的比较
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Feb;81(1):39-60. doi: 10.1177/0013164420918655. Epub 2020 May 2.
5
Modeling Test-Taking Non-effort in MIRT Models.在多指标多因索模型中对考试不努力行为进行建模
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 4;10:145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00145. eCollection 2019.
6
General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales.具有不同项目反应结构的通用混合项目反应模型:应用于李克特量表的阐述。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2325-2344. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0997-0.
7
A generalized item response tree model for psychological assessments.一种用于心理评估的广义项目反应树模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1070-85. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0631-y.