Viganò Paola, Caprara Francesca, Giola Francesca, Di Stefano Giorgia, Somigliana Edgardo, Vercellini Paolo
Infertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Academic Center for Research on Adenomyosis and Endometriosis, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Hum Reprod Open. 2024 Jul 12;2024(3):hoae045. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae045. eCollection 2024.
What are the quantitative, qualitative, and temporal patterns of retrograde mentruation?
The extreme quantitative and qualitative heterogeneity of the available studies prevents the definitive conclusion that retrograde menstruation is a universal and consistent phenomenon during the reproductive period.
Retrograde menstruation has been defined as a universal, physiological phenomenon that occurs similarly in about 90% of menstruators during the reproductive period. However, uncertainties still exist in terms of the event frequency, total amount, and cellular composition of retrograde menstruation and the differences between individuals with versus those without endometriosis.
Two systematic reviews were performed, one for human studies, and one for non-human primate studies. We retrieved studies from the PubMed and Embase databases published between 1 January 1980 and 1 November 2023. Studies published in the English language were included and identified using a combination of MeSH terms. References from relevant publications were systematically screened and further articles were identified using PubMed's 'similar articles' and 'cited by' functions.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Results were reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that did not report original data or provided a review of the field were excluded. Bias analysis was completed for each included human study by using the Newcastle-Ottawa scoring system.
Fifteen studies were finally included in the human systematic review, mostly with limited sample sizes. The macroscopic visualization of blood in PF during menses was reported with a frequency ranging from 9% to 100%. A prevalence of endometrial cells detected in peritoneal fluid ranging from 8% to 75% was reported in the various studies. Controversial findings were reported in relation to patients with endometriosis. Retrograde menstruation has been evaluated cross-sectionally on single occasions, and no information is available on the course of the phenomenon within an entire cycle and between subsequent cycles. Two studies were included in the non-human primate systematic review; one of them showed that retrograde menstruation was observed more frequently in baboons with naturally occurring endometriosis (83%) than in those with a normal pelvis (51%).
In humans, peritoneal fluid has often been collected at different cycle phases and not systematically during menstruation. The indication for laparoscopy was not always clear for all participants. A wide variety of methods were used to detect endometrial cells, including cytological staining, cell block analysis, immunocytochemistry, and various methods of cell culture.
The idea that almost all women experience retrograde menstruation regularly and similarly during their reproductive life is currently unsubstantiated. It is an academic notion accepted uncritically. Development of endometriosis may derive from differences in the frequency or severity of the event.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The review was partially funded by Italian Ministry of Health-Current Research IRCCS. P.Vi. serves as co-editor in Chief of Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders. E.S. serves as Editor in Chief of Human Reproduction Open and discloses research grants from Ferring, Ibsa, Gedeon Richter, and Theramex, and honoraria from Ibsa and Gedeon Richter. P.Ve. serves as Associate Editor for Human Reproduction Open; is a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, of the Italian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and of the International Editorial Board of Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica; has received royalties from Wolters Kluwer for chapters on endometriosis management in the clinical decision support resource UpToDate; and maintains both a public and private gynecological practice. All other authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
N/A.
经血逆流的数量、质量和时间模式是怎样的?
现有研究在数量和质量上存在极大的异质性,因此无法得出确定性结论,即经血逆流是生殖期普遍且一致的现象。
经血逆流被定义为一种普遍的生理现象,在约90%的生殖期女性中类似发生。然而,经血逆流的事件频率、总量、细胞组成以及子宫内膜异位症患者与非患者之间的差异仍存在不确定性。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:进行了两项系统评价,一项针对人体研究,一项针对非人灵长类动物研究。我们检索了1980年1月1日至2023年11月1日期间发表在PubMed和Embase数据库中的研究。纳入以英语发表的研究,并使用医学主题词组合进行识别。对相关出版物的参考文献进行系统筛选,并使用PubMed的“相似文章”和“被引用文章”功能识别更多文章。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:根据PRISMA指南报告结果。未报告原始数据或仅提供该领域综述的研究被排除。通过使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华评分系统对每项纳入的人体研究进行偏倚分析。
最终有15项研究纳入人体系统评价,大多样本量有限。经期盆腔液中血液的宏观可视化报告频率为9%至100%。不同研究报告的腹膜液中检测到子宫内膜细胞的患病率为8%至75%。关于子宫内膜异位症患者有相互矛盾的发现。经血逆流仅在单次横断面进行评估,对于整个周期内以及后续周期该现象的过程尚无可用信息。两项研究纳入非人灵长类动物系统评价;其中一项研究表明,自然发生子宫内膜异位症的狒狒(83%)比骨盆正常的狒狒(51%)更频繁出现经血逆流。
局限性、谨慎原因:在人体研究中,盆腔液常于不同周期阶段采集,而非在经期系统采集。并非所有参与者腹腔镜检查的指征都明确。检测子宫内膜细胞使用了多种方法,包括细胞学染色、细胞块分析、免疫细胞化学以及各种细胞培养方法。
目前尚无证据支持几乎所有女性在生殖期都定期且类似地经历经血逆流这一观点。这是一个被不加批判接受的学术概念。子宫内膜异位症的发生可能源于该事件频率或严重程度的差异。
研究资金/利益冲突:该综述部分由意大利卫生部-当前研究IRCCS资助。P.Vi.担任《子宫内膜异位症与子宫疾病杂志》主编。E.S.担任《人类生殖开放杂志》主编,并披露从辉凌、依巴、吉德昂·里奇特和赛美克斯获得研究资助,以及从依巴和吉德昂·里奇特获得酬金。P.Ve.担任《人类生殖开放杂志》副主编;是《加拿大妇产科杂志》《意大利妇产科杂志》编辑委员会成员以及《斯堪的纳维亚产科学与妇科学杂志》国际编辑委员会成员;因在临床决策支持资源UpToDate中关于子宫内膜异位症管理章节从威科集团获得版税;并同时拥有公立和私立妇科诊所。所有其他作者声明无利益冲突。
无。