• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外研究莫氏锥度种植体上三种不同种植体-基台界面的微生物渗漏情况

Microbial Leakage through Three Different Implant-Abutment Interfaces on Morse Taper Implants In Vitro.

作者信息

Ribeiro Ricardo Faria, Mata Victor Barboza da, Tomaselli Lucas de Oliveira, Simionato Anselmo Agostinho, Santos Emerson de Souza, Faria Adriana Cláudia Lapria, Rodrigues Renata Cristina Silveira, do Nascimento Cássio

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials and Prostheses, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil.

Department of Clinical Analysis, Toxicology, and Food Science, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-903, Brazil.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 19;12(7):226. doi: 10.3390/dj12070226.

DOI:10.3390/dj12070226
PMID:39057013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11275855/
Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate microbial leakage by means of genome counts, through the implant-abutment interface in dental implants with different Morse taper abutments. Fifty-six samples were prepared and divided in four groups: CMC TB (14 Cylindrical Implants-14 TiBase Abutments), CMX TB (14 Conical Implants-14 TiBase Abutments), CMX PU (14 Conical Implants-14 Universal Abutment) and CMX U (14 Tapered Implants-14 UCLA Abutments). Assemblies had their interface submerged in saliva as the contaminant. Samples were subjected either to thermomechanical cycling (2 × 10 mechanical cycles with frequency of 5 Hz and load of 120 N simultaneously with thermal cycles of 5-55 °C) or thermal cycling (5-55 °C). After cycling, the contents from the inner parts of assemblies were collected and analyzed using the Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique. Significant differences in the total genome counts were found after both thermomechanical or thermal cycling: CMX U > CMX PU > CMX TB > CMC TB. There were also significant differences in individual bacterial counts in each of the groups ( < 0.05). Irrespective of mechanical cycling, the type of abutment seems to influence not only the total microbial leakage through the interface, but also seems to significantly reflect differences considering individual target species.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过基因组计数,评估不同莫氏锥度基台的牙种植体中种植体-基台界面的微生物渗漏情况。制备了56个样本,并将其分为四组:CMC TB(14个圆柱形种植体-14个钛基台)、CMX TB(14个锥形种植体-14个钛基台)、CMX PU(14个锥形种植体-14个通用基台)和CMX U(14个锥形种植体-14个UCLA基台)。将组件的界面浸没在作为污染物的唾液中。样本分别进行热机械循环(2×10个机械循环,频率为5 Hz,负载为120 N,同时进行5-55°C的热循环)或热循环(5-55°C)。循环后,收集组件内部的内容物,并使用棋盘式DNA-DNA杂交技术进行分析。在热机械循环或热循环后,总基因组计数均发现显著差异:CMX U>CMX PU>CMX TB>CMC TB。各组的单个细菌计数也存在显著差异(<0.05)。无论是否进行机械循环,基台类型似乎不仅会影响通过界面的总微生物渗漏,而且似乎在考虑单个目标物种时也能显著反映差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/cbdd7a75fe6b/dentistry-12-00226-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/5e2323819278/dentistry-12-00226-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/8d23cf4c426c/dentistry-12-00226-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/2999937cdd73/dentistry-12-00226-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/8f4895fd9b66/dentistry-12-00226-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/89a45a39b622/dentistry-12-00226-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/0bcc3dcfc3bc/dentistry-12-00226-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/c12760fd2544/dentistry-12-00226-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/41950252aab7/dentistry-12-00226-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/c0eb8fd4facc/dentistry-12-00226-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/3b3daf06318e/dentistry-12-00226-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/cbdd7a75fe6b/dentistry-12-00226-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/5e2323819278/dentistry-12-00226-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/8d23cf4c426c/dentistry-12-00226-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/2999937cdd73/dentistry-12-00226-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/8f4895fd9b66/dentistry-12-00226-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/89a45a39b622/dentistry-12-00226-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/0bcc3dcfc3bc/dentistry-12-00226-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/c12760fd2544/dentistry-12-00226-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/41950252aab7/dentistry-12-00226-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/c0eb8fd4facc/dentistry-12-00226-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/3b3daf06318e/dentistry-12-00226-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/11275855/cbdd7a75fe6b/dentistry-12-00226-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Microbial Leakage through Three Different Implant-Abutment Interfaces on Morse Taper Implants In Vitro.体外研究莫氏锥度种植体上三种不同种植体-基台界面的微生物渗漏情况
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 19;12(7):226. doi: 10.3390/dj12070226.
2
Iodoform and silver-coated abutments preventing bacterial leakage through the implant-abutment interfaces: In vitro analysis using molecular-based method.使用分子生物学方法检测银碘仿涂层基台对种植体-基台界面细菌渗漏的影响:体外研究
Arch Oral Biol. 2019 Sep;105:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
3
Effect of internal hexagonal index on removal torque and tensile removal force of different Morse taper connection abutments.不同莫氏锥度连接基台的内六方指数对去除扭矩和拉伸去除力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May;117(5):621-627. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
4
Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions.种植体-基台界面的唾液渗漏:三种不同种植体连接在非负重和负重条件下的体外评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):551-60.
5
In vitro analysis of the microbiological sealing of tapered implants after mechanical cycling.机械循环后锥形种植体微生物封闭的体外分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Dec;20(9):2437-2445. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1744-0. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
6
Microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface of Morse taper implants in vitro.体外研究莫氏锥度种植体-基台界面处微生物渗漏
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Mar;21(3):328-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01837.x. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
7
Changes in the abutment-implant interface in Morse taper implant connections after mechanical cycling: a pilot study.机械循环后莫氏锥度种植体连接中基台-种植体界面的变化:一项初步研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):791-7. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3113.
8
Marginal fit and microbial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of fixed partial prostheses: An in vitro analysis using Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.固定局部义齿种植体-基台界面的边缘适合性和微生物渗漏:使用棋盘式DNA-DNA杂交的体外分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Dec;114(6):831-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.05.009. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
9
Effects of Taper Angle and Sealant Agents on Bacterial Leakage Along the Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study Under Loaded Conditions.锥角和封闭剂对种植体-基台界面细菌渗漏的影响:负载条件下的体外研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 September/October;33(5):1071–1077. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6257. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
10
Evaluation of axial displacement and torque loss of Morse-type prosthetic abutments of different angular tapers to their respective implants.评估不同角度锥度的莫氏型修复基台相对于各自种植体的轴向位移和扭矩损失。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Dec;132(6):1311.e1-1311.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Erythritol-Based Air Polishing and Ultrasonic Instrumentation with PEEK Inserts in Peri-Implant Maintenance: A Randomized Clinical Trial Including Different Prosthetic Materials.基于赤藓糖醇的空气抛光和带聚醚醚酮插入物的超声器械在种植体周围维护中的有效性:一项纳入不同修复材料的随机临床试验。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 May 26;13(6):235. doi: 10.3390/dj13060235.

本文引用的文献

1
A Literature Review on Implant Abutment Types, Materials, and Fabrication Processes.种植体基台类型、材料和制作工艺的文献综述。
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;33(1):57-66. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022042720.
2
Bacterial infiltration and detorque at the implant abutment morse taper interface after masticatory simulation.咀嚼模拟后种植体基台莫氏锥度界面的细菌渗透和松动。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 12;12(1):17103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20915-z.
3
The impact of Morse taper implant design on microleakage at implant-healing abutment interface.
莫氏锥度种植体设计对种植体-愈合基台界面微渗漏的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2022 Oct 2;41(5):767-773. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2022-022. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
4
Microleakage assessment of CAD-CAM Cobalt-Chrome and Zirconia abutments on a conical connection dental implant: A comparative in vitro study.CAD-CAM 钴铬和氧化锆基台在锥形连接牙科种植体上的微渗漏评估:一项体外比较研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Sep;33(9):945-952. doi: 10.1111/clr.13973. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
5
Fungi-A Component of the Oral Microbiome Involved in Periodontal Diseases.真菌——参与牙周疾病的口腔微生物群的一个组成部分
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1373:113-138. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-96881-6_6.
6
Analysis of Torque Maintenance and Fracture Resistance after Fatigue in Retention Screws Made of Different Metals for Screw-Retained Implant-Borne Prosthesis Joints.用于螺丝固位种植体支持式修复体连接的不同金属固位螺丝疲劳后扭矩保持和抗断裂性分析
Int J Dent. 2021 Nov 18;2021:9693239. doi: 10.1155/2021/9693239. eCollection 2021.
7
Evaluation of Removal Torque and Internal Surface Alterations in Frictional Morse Taper Connections After Mechanical Loading Associated or Not with Oral Biofilm.评估机械负载对摩擦莫氏锥度连接的去除扭矩和内部表面变化的影响,包括与口腔生物膜相关或不相关的情况。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 May-Jun;36(3):492-501. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8483.
8
Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique.采用复制技术评估 Ti-Base 基台与种植体之间的三维不匹配。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2020 Nov 30;28:e20200343. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0343. eCollection 2020.
9
Breaking the wave of peri-implantitis.打破种植体周围炎的浪潮。
Periodontol 2000. 2020 Oct;84(1):145-160. doi: 10.1111/prd.12335.
10
Antimicrobial Prosthetic Surfaces in the Oral Cavity-A Perspective on Creative Approaches.口腔中的抗菌修复表面——创新方法的视角
Microorganisms. 2020 Aug 17;8(8):1247. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8081247.