North East Cancer Center, Health Sciences North, Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM U), Sudbury, ON P3E5J1, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H8L6, Canada.
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jun 28;31(7):3738-3751. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31070275.
Evidence from phase three clinical trials helps shape clinical practice. However, a very small minority of patients with cancer participate in clinical trials and many trials are not completed on time due to slow accrual. Issues with restrictive eligibility criteria can severely limit the patients who can access trials, without any convincing evidence that these restrictions impact patient safety. Similarly, regulatory, organizational, and institutional hurdles can delay trial activation, ultimately making some studies irrelevant. Additional issues during trial conduct (e.g., mandatory in-person visits, central confirmation of standard biomarkers, and inflexible drug dosage modification) contribute to making trials non-patient-centric. These real-life observations from experienced clinical trialists can seem nonsensical to investigators and patients alike, who are trying to bring effective drugs to patients with cancer. In this review, we delve into these issues in detail, and discuss potential solutions to make clinical trials more accessible to patients.
来自三期临床试验的证据有助于规范临床实践。然而,只有极少数癌症患者参与临床试验,而且由于入组速度较慢,许多试验都不能按时完成。由于入选标准过于严格,许多本可参与试验的患者无法入组,而没有任何证据表明这些限制会影响患者安全。同样,监管、组织和机构方面的障碍也会延迟试验启动,最终使一些研究变得不相关。试验过程中还存在其他问题(例如,强制性的当面访视、标准生物标志物的中心确认和不灵活的药物剂量调整),导致试验无法以患者为中心。这些来自经验丰富的临床试验人员的实际观察结果,对于试图为癌症患者带来有效药物的研究人员和患者来说,似乎毫无意义。在这篇综述中,我们详细探讨了这些问题,并讨论了使临床试验更易于患者参与的潜在解决方案。