Mutale Faith
Abramson Cancer Center, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2022 Nov;13(8):755-757. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2022.13.8.2. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
The lack of diversity in cancer trials is a multifaceted, decades-old problem that has remained persistent despite efforts to increase the number of participants from underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds. This lack of meaningful improvement is a problem that continues to perpetuate inequities in cancer care. For optimal generalizability of clinical trial results, populations that are likely to be treated must be adequately represented. Beyond consensus statements, policy enactments, and federal mandates, strategic collaboration with at-risk underrepresented communities is critically necessary to improve the accrual of minorities to cancer clinical trials. As such, the clarion call is for advanced practitioners in oncology to take a keen interest in this issue and seek to develop population-specific strategies to bridge and eliminate the disparity gap and improve outcomes in these groups.
癌症试验缺乏多样性是一个多方面的、存在数十年的问题,尽管人们努力增加来自代表性不足的种族和族裔背景的参与者数量,但这个问题一直存在。这种缺乏实质性改善的情况是一个持续存在的问题,它使癌症治疗中的不平等现象长期存在。为了使临床试验结果具有最佳的普遍性,必须充分纳入可能接受治疗的人群。除了达成共识声明、制定政策和联邦授权外,与处于风险中的代表性不足社区进行战略合作对于提高少数族裔参与癌症临床试验的人数至关重要。因此,迫切需要肿瘤学领域的高级从业者对这个问题产生浓厚兴趣,并寻求制定针对特定人群的策略,以弥合和消除差距,改善这些群体的治疗效果。