Suppr超能文献

心血管疾病中固定剂量复方制剂进行渐进性创新的促进因素与障碍

Facilitators and Barriers of Incremental Innovation by Fixed Dose Combinations in Cardiovascular Diseases.

作者信息

Inotai András, Kaló Zoltán, Petykó Zsuzsanna, Gyöngyösi Kristóf, O'Keeffe Derek T, Czech Marcin, Ágh Tamás

机构信息

Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, 1091 Budapest, Hungary.

Syreon Research Institute, 1142 Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jun 21;11(7):186. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11070186.

Abstract

Despite the availability of affordable pharmaceuticals treating cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), many of the risk factors remain poorly controlled. Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs), a form of incremental innovation, have already demonstrated improvements over combinations of single medicines in adherence and hard clinical endpoints. Nevertheless, there are many barriers related to the wider use of FDCs in CVDs. Our aim was to identify these barriers and explore system-level facilitators from a multi-stakeholder perspective. Identified barriers include (i) hurdles in evidence generation for manufacturers, (ii) limited acceptance of adherence as an endpoint by clinical guideline developers and policymakers, (iii) limited options for a price premium for incremental innovation for healthcare payers, (iv) limited availability of real-world evidence, and (v) methodological issues to measure improved adherence. Initiatives to standardize and link healthcare databases in European countries, movements towards improved patient centricity in healthcare, and extended value assessment provide opportunities to capture the benefits of FDCs. Still, there is an emerging need to facilitate the generalizability of sporadic clinical evidence across different FDCs and to improve adherence measures. Finally, healthcare payers need to be convinced to pay a fair premium price for the added value of FDCs to incentivize incremental innovation in CVD treatment.

摘要

尽管有价格亲民的治疗心血管疾病(CVDs)的药物,但许多风险因素仍未得到有效控制。固定剂量复方制剂(FDCs)作为渐进性创新的一种形式,已证明在依从性和硬性临床终点方面比单一药物组合有所改善。然而,FDCs在CVDs中更广泛应用存在许多障碍。我们的目的是识别这些障碍,并从多利益相关方的角度探索系统层面的促进因素。识别出的障碍包括:(i)制造商在证据生成方面的障碍;(ii)临床指南制定者和政策制定者对将依从性作为终点的接受程度有限;(iii)医疗保健支付方为渐进性创新支付价格溢价的选择有限;(iv)真实世界证据的可用性有限;(v)衡量依从性改善的方法学问题。欧洲国家标准化和链接医疗保健数据库的举措、医疗保健向以患者为中心改进的趋势以及扩展的价值评估为获取FDCs的益处提供了机会。不过,仍迫切需要促进零星临床证据在不同FDCs之间的推广,并改进依从性测量方法。最后,需要说服医疗保健支付方为FDCs的附加值支付合理的溢价,以激励CVD治疗的渐进性创新。

相似文献

2
Barriers and facilitators of exploiting the potential of value-added medicines.利用增值药物潜力的障碍和促进因素。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Jun;20(3):229-236. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1758558. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
4
Value added medicines: what value repurposed medicines might bring to society?增值药物:重新利用的药物可能给社会带来什么价值?
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2016 Dec 23;5(1):1264717. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2017.1264717. eCollection 2017.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Evergreened drugs or evergreened profits?常青药物还是常青利润?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Dec;28(6):1119-1126. doi: 10.1111/jep.13695. Epub 2022 May 11.

本文引用的文献

2
Improving medication adherence in cardiovascular disease.改善心血管疾病患者的药物依从性。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024 Jun;21(6):417-429. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00972-1. Epub 2024 Jan 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验