Suppr超能文献

利用增值药物潜力的障碍和促进因素。

Barriers and facilitators of exploiting the potential of value-added medicines.

机构信息

Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University , Budapest, Hungary.

Syreon Research Institute , Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Jun;20(3):229-236. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1758558. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) is costly and only a minority of patients can access innovative medicines due to affordability constraints. Value-added medicines (VAMs) can offer potential benefits at significantly lower R&D costs.

AREAS COVERED

VAMs may address different health care needs and problems, including off-label use of medicines, poor patient adherence, problems related to polypharmacy, need for home and/or personalized health care services. However, several barriers prevent societies from maximizing the benefits of incremental innovation related to VAMs. Generic manufacturers have limited budget and experience to demonstrate the value of new VAMs. Current market exclusivity options do not efficiently exclude freeridership and do not guarantee a return on investment for VAM innovators. Value propositions of VAMs are limitedly consistent with current HTA frameworks, consequently, incremental innovation is not acknowledged, nor rewarded with differential pricing by payers. Moreover, VAMs are often perceived solely as generic medicines by prescribers.

EXPERT OPINION

Current practices may need to be reconsidered to exploit the full societal benefit of VAMs, including more efficient policies to guarantee market exclusivity for incremental innovation, acknowledgment of a fair price premium based on a specific value framework and the acceptance of low-cost evidence generation methods.

摘要

简介

药品研发成本高昂,由于负担能力的限制,只有少数患者能够获得创新药物。增值药物(VAMs)可以以更低的研发成本提供潜在的益处。

涵盖领域

VAMs 可以满足不同的医疗保健需求和问题,包括药品的超说明书使用、患者用药依从性差、与多种药物治疗相关的问题、对家庭和/或个性化医疗保健服务的需求。然而,一些障碍阻碍了社会充分利用与 VAMs 相关的增量创新的好处。仿制药制造商在证明新的 VAMs 的价值方面预算和经验有限。当前的市场独占选项不能有效地排除搭便车行为,也不能保证 VAM 创新者的投资回报。VAMs 的价值主张与当前的 HTA 框架有限一致,因此,增量创新不被认可,支付者也不会通过差别定价来奖励。此外,VAMs 通常仅被开处方者视为仿制药。

专家意见

为了充分利用 VAMs 的社会效益,当前的做法可能需要重新考虑,包括更有效的政策来保证增量创新的市场独占权,承认基于特定价值框架的合理价格溢价,并接受低成本的证据生成方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验