• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同脱壳方法对田间筛选降低玉米黄曲霉毒素污染数据变异性的影响。

Effects of Different Shelling Methods on Data Variability during Field Screening for Reduced Aflatoxin Contamination in Maize.

机构信息

Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223, USA.

USDA-ARS, Corn Host Resistance Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.

出版信息

Toxins (Basel). 2024 Jul 19;16(7):324. doi: 10.3390/toxins16070324.

DOI:10.3390/toxins16070324
PMID:39057964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11281036/
Abstract

Non-genetic variation limits the identification of novel maize germplasm with genetic markers for reduced infection and aflatoxin contamination. Aflatoxin measurements can vary substantially within fields containing the same germplasm following inoculation with . While some variation is expected due to microenvironmental differences, components of field screening methodologies may also contribute to variability in collected data. Therefore, the objective of this study is to test the effects of three different shelling methods (whole ear (WE), ear end removal (EER), and inoculation site-surrounding (ISS)) to obtain bulk samples from maize on aflatoxin measurements. Five ears per row of three inbred lines and two hybrids were inoculated with , then shelled using the three different methods, and aflatoxin was quantified. Overall, EER and ISS resulted in reduced coefficients of variance (CVs) in comparison to WE for both inbred and hybrid maize lines, with two exceptions. Susceptible B73 showed increased CVs with both EER and ISS compared to WE, and resistant Mp719's EER CVs marginally increased compared to WE. While WE is the standard practice for most breeding programs due to its technical simplicity, EER and ISS may allow for finely phenotyping parental lines for further breeding applications.

摘要

非遗传变异限制了利用减少感染和黄曲霉毒素污染的遗传标记来鉴定新型玉米种质。在接种 后,同一种质的田间测量值可能会有很大差异。虽然由于微环境差异,预计会有一些变化,但田间筛选方法的组成部分也可能导致收集数据的变异性。因此,本研究的目的是测试三种不同脱粒方法(整穗(WE)、穗端去除(EER)和接种点周围(ISS))对获得玉米黄曲霉毒素测量值的批量样品的影响。用 对三行三个自交系和两个杂交种的每五个穗进行接种,然后用三种不同的方法脱粒,并对黄曲霉毒素进行定量。总体而言,与 WE 相比,EER 和 ISS 降低了自交系和杂交系玉米的变异系数(CV),但有两个例外。易感 B73 与 WE 相比,EER 和 ISS 的 CV 均增加,而抗性 Mp719 的 EER CV 与 WE 相比略有增加。尽管由于技术简单,WE 是大多数育种计划的标准做法,但 EER 和 ISS 可能允许对亲本系进行精细表型分析,以用于进一步的育种应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21fd/11281036/c6c42c607368/toxins-16-00324-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21fd/11281036/47aba6565364/toxins-16-00324-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21fd/11281036/c6c42c607368/toxins-16-00324-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21fd/11281036/47aba6565364/toxins-16-00324-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21fd/11281036/c6c42c607368/toxins-16-00324-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Different Shelling Methods on Data Variability during Field Screening for Reduced Aflatoxin Contamination in Maize.不同脱壳方法对田间筛选降低玉米黄曲霉毒素污染数据变异性的影响。
Toxins (Basel). 2024 Jul 19;16(7):324. doi: 10.3390/toxins16070324.
2
Aflatoxin in maize: a review of the early literature from "moldy-corn toxicosis" to the genetics of aflatoxin accumulation resistance.玉米中的黄曲霉毒素:从“霉变玉米中毒”到黄曲霉毒素积累抗性遗传的早期文献综述。
Mycotoxin Res. 2019 May;35(2):111-128. doi: 10.1007/s12550-018-00340-w. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
3
Identification of maize genes associated with host plant resistance or susceptibility to Aspergillus flavus infection and aflatoxin accumulation.鉴定与宿主植物对黄曲霉侵染和黄曲霉毒素积累的抗性或易感性相关的玉米基因。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036892. Epub 2012 May 14.
4
Biological Control of Aflatoxin in Maize Grown in Serbia.塞尔维亚玉米上的黄曲霉毒素的生物防治。
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Mar 5;12(3):162. doi: 10.3390/toxins12030162.
5
Distribution, Genetic Diversity and Biocontrol of Aflatoxigenic in Serbian Maize Fields.塞尔维亚玉米田中产黄曲霉毒素的分布、遗传多样性和生物防治。
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Sep 27;13(10):687. doi: 10.3390/toxins13100687.
6
A USA-Africa collaborative strategy for identifying, characterizing, and developing maize germplasm with resistance to aflatoxin contamination.一项美国与非洲合作的战略,旨在鉴定、表征和开发抗黄曲霉毒素污染的玉米种质。
Mycopathologia. 2006 Sep;162(3):225-32. doi: 10.1007/s11046-006-0056-3.
7
Assessment of Maize Hybrids Resistance to Aspergillus Ear Rot and Aflatoxin Production in Environmental Conditions in Serbia.评估塞尔维亚环境条件下玉米杂交种对曲霉菌穗腐病和黄曲霉毒素生产的抗性。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Dec 19;14(12):887. doi: 10.3390/toxins14120887.
8
Resistance to aflatoxin accumulation in kernels of maize inbreds selected for ear rot resistance in West and Central Africa.在西非和中非选择的对穗腐病具有抗性的玉米自交系籽粒中,对黄曲霉毒素积累的抗性。
J Food Prot. 2001 Mar;64(3):396-400. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-64.3.396.
9
Identification and Quantification of a Toxigenic and Non-Toxigenic Aspergillus flavus Strain in Contaminated Maize Using Quantitative Real-Time PCR.使用定量实时聚合酶链反应对受污染玉米中一种产毒和不产毒黄曲霉菌株进行鉴定和定量分析。
Toxins (Basel). 2016 Jan 4;8(1):15. doi: 10.3390/toxins8010015.
10
Susceptibility to aflatoxin contamination among maize landraces from Mexico.墨西哥玉米地方品种对黄曲霉毒素污染的易感性。
J Food Prot. 2014 Sep;77(9):1554-62. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-474.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding Current Methods for Sampling of Aflatoxins in Corn and to Generate a Best Practice Framework.了解玉米中黄曲霉毒素采样的当前方法,并生成最佳实践框架。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Nov 23;14(12):819. doi: 10.3390/toxins14120819.
2
Validation and Application of a Low-Cost Sorting Device for Fumonisin Reduction in Maize.验证和应用一种低成本的玉米伏马菌素去除设备。
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Sep 14;13(9):652. doi: 10.3390/toxins13090652.
3
Pre-Harvest Modelling and Mitigation of Aflatoxins in Maize in a Changing Climatic Environment-A Review.
气候变化环境下玉米中黄曲霉毒素的采前建模与缓解措施综述。
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Dec 4;12(12):768. doi: 10.3390/toxins12120768.
4
Two New Reference Genomes Reveal a Large Insertion Potentially Contributing to Isolate Stress Tolerance and Aflatoxin Production.两个新的参考基因组揭示了一个大的插入,可能有助于分离物的应激耐受和黄曲霉毒素的产生。
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Oct 5;10(10):3515-3531. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401405.
5
Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci Associated With Resistance to Aflatoxin Accumulation in Maize Inbred Mp719.定位与玉米自交系Mp719中黄曲霉毒素积累抗性相关的数量性状位点
Front Microbiol. 2020 Feb 4;11:45. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00045. eCollection 2020.
6
Genomics-assisted breeding for ear rot resistances and reduced mycotoxin contamination in maize: methods, advances and prospects.基于基因组学的玉米穗腐病抗性和降低黄曲霉毒素污染的育种:方法、进展与展望。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Oct;132(10):2721-2739. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03412-2. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
7
Cyclopiazonic Acid Is a Pathogenicity Factor for Aspergillus flavus and a Promising Target for Screening Germplasm for Ear Rot Resistance.环匹阿尼酸是黄曲霉的致病性因子,也是筛选抗穗腐种质资源的有希望的靶标。
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2017 May;30(5):361-373. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-02-17-0026-R. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
8
Confirmation and Fine Mapping of a Major QTL for Aflatoxin Resistance in Maize Using a Combination of Linkage and Association Mapping.利用连锁分析和关联分析相结合的方法对玉米抗黄曲霉毒素主效QTL进行验证和精细定位
Toxins (Basel). 2016 Sep 2;8(9):258. doi: 10.3390/toxins8090258.
9
Aflatoxin regulations in a network of global maize trade.全球玉米贸易网络中的黄曲霉毒素法规。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045151. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
10
Occurrence of ochratoxin A in cocoa beans: effect of shelling.可可豆中赭曲霉毒素A的存在:去壳的影响。
Food Addit Contam. 2005 Jun;22(6):590-6. doi: 10.1080/02652030500130160.