Reddy Yogesh N V, Dubrock Hilary, Hassoun Paul M, Hemnes Anna, Horn Evelyn, Leopold Jane A, Rischard Franz, Rosenzweig Erika B, Hill Nicholas S, Erzurum Serpil C, Beck Gerald J, Mathai Stephen C, Mukherjee Monica, Tang W H Wilson, Borlaug Barry A, Frantz Robert P
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Nov;26(11):2323-2336. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3396. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
The clinical utility of pulmonary hypertension (PH) risk scores in non-group 1 PH with pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) remains unresolved.
We utilized the prospective multicenter PVDOMICS cohort with group 2, 3, 4 or 5 PH-related PVD and calculated group 1 PH risk scores (REVEAL 2.0, REVEAL Lite 2, French registry score and COMPERA 2). The c-statistic to predict death was compared separately in (i) pre-capillary PH groups 3/4/5, and (ii) combined post- and pre-capillary PH group 2. Exercise right heart catheterization reserve, ventricular interdependence and right ventricular-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling were compared across risk categories. Among 449 individuals with group 3/4/5 PH, the REVEAL 2.0 risk score had the highest c-statistic for predicting death (0.699, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.660-0.737, p < 0.0001) with comparable performance using the simpler REVEAL Lite 2 score (0.695, 95% CI 0.656-0.734, p < 0.0001). The French and COMPERA 2 risk scores were also predictive of mortality, but performance of both was statistically inferior to REVEAL 2.0 (c-statistic difference -0.072, 95% CI -0.123 to -0.020, p = 0.006, and -0.043, 95% CI -0.067 to -0.018, p = 0.0007, respectively). RV function and RV-PA coupling measures were prognostic in isolation, but did not add incremental value to REVEAL (p > 0.50 for all). Findings were similar in patients with group 2 PH (n = 239). Stratification by the REVEAL Lite 2 score non-invasively identified non-group 1 PH with more advanced PVD with worse exercise capacity, RV-PA uncoupling, ventricular interdependence and impaired cardiac output reserve (p < 0.05 for all).
Non-invasive REVEAL risk predicts mortality in non-group 1 PH without incremental prognostic value from detailed RV function or RV-PA coupling assessment. Baseline REVEAL Lite 2 risk stratification non-invasively identifies greater pulmonary vascular dysfunction and right heart-related exercise limitation, which may help guide patient selection for targeted pulmonary vascular therapies in non-group 1 PH.
肺动脉高压(PH)风险评分在非1组伴有肺血管疾病(PVD)的PH中的临床应用仍未明确。
我们利用了前瞻性多中心PVDOMICS队列,其中包括2、3、4或5组与PH相关的PVD,并计算了1组PH风险评分(REVEAL 2.0、REVEAL Lite 2、法国注册评分和COMPERA 2)。分别在(i)毛细血管前PH组3/4/5和(ii)毛细血管后和毛细血管前PH联合组2中比较预测死亡的c统计量。比较了不同风险类别之间的运动右心导管储备、心室相互依赖和右心室-肺动脉(RV-PA)耦合情况。在449例3/4/5组PH患者中,REVEAL 2.0风险评分在预测死亡方面具有最高的c统计量(0.699,95%置信区间[CI]0.660-0.737,p<0.0001),使用更简单的REVEAL Lite 2评分时表现相当(0.695,95%CI 0.656-0.734,p<0.0001)。法国和COMPERA 2风险评分也可预测死亡率,但两者的表现在统计学上均低于REVEAL 2.0(c统计量差异分别为-0.072,95%CI -0.123至-0.020,p=0.006;以及-0.043,95%CI -0.067至-0.018,p=0.0007)。RV功能和RV-PA耦合指标单独具有预后价值,但对REVEAL没有增加额外价值(所有p>0.50)。2组PH患者(n=239)的结果相似。根据REVEAL Lite 2评分进行分层可无创地识别出非1组PH中PVD更严重、运动能力更差、RV-PA解耦、心室相互依赖且心输出量储备受损的患者(所有p<0.05)。
非侵入性的REVEAL风险可预测非1组PH的死亡率,详细的RV功能或RV-PA耦合评估无额外的预后价值。基线REVEAL Lite 2风险分层可无创地识别出更严重的肺血管功能障碍和与右心相关的运动受限,这可能有助于指导非1组PH患者靶向肺血管治疗的患者选择。