• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从社会技术和复杂适应系统的角度探讨荷兰皮肤科医生对远程皮肤病学的体验和满意度。

An Exploration of Dutch Dermatologists' Experience and Satisfaction With Teledermatology: Sociotechnical and Complex Adaptive System Perspective.

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Dermatol. 2024 Jul 26;7:e56723. doi: 10.2196/56723.

DOI:10.2196/56723
PMID:39059000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11316153/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the global upscale of teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic, persistent barriers, such as the poor anamnesis and photo quality, hinder its effective use in practice. Understanding Dutch dermatologists' experiences and satisfaction with using the teledermatology system in the Dutch health care system is needed. A holistic evaluation may provide valuable insight to understand how barriers interrelate which is deemed necessary for the innovation of teledermatology in practice.

OBJECTIVE

Guided by a complex adaptive system perspective, this study aims to understand Dutch dermatologists' experience and satisfaction with their training, support communication, interaction, and usage of a teledermatology platform of a Dutch digital hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic, uncovering insights to improve teledermatology services for the future.

METHODS

A web-based questionnaire was sent in December 2021 to Dutch dermatologists who (1) had an active teledermatology platform account, and (2) responded to a teledermatology consultation between October 1, 2019, and September 30, 2021. The questionnaire consisted of the validated Store-and-Forward Telemedicine Service User-satisfaction Questionnaire (SAF-TSUQ) questionnaire, and new questions regarding; demographics of teledermatologists, the use of teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic, the performance of teledermatology by general practitioners (GP), and the role of dermatologists in the teledermatology process. The open-ended questions were analyzed by a grounded theory approach guided by a sociotechnical model and complemented by a complex adaptive system perspective. A panel discussion with 3 dermatologists was performed to provide additional insight into the responses to the questionnaire.

RESULTS

We obtained responses from 25 out of the 249 (10%) invited dermatologists. Overall, dermatologists had a positive experience with teledermatology. Interestingly, teledermatology use frequency remained unaffected by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the insufficient quality and incompleteness of the clinical content (photos and anamneses information) of the teledermatology consultation impacted the efficiency of the teledermatology workflow. Dermatologists expressed the need for improvement to avoid time-consuming processes or physical referrals. The panel discussion enriched and confirmed the responses, suggesting solutions like mandatory fields for the GPs for a complete anamnesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Dutch Dermatologists view teledermatology as a valuable tool to provide access to dermatology care. However, improvements regarding the quality and completeness of the provided clinical content are necessary for the effectiveness and efficiency of the complex teledermatology system in Dutch health care. This could increase both the dermatologists' satisfaction and the quality of teledermatology services. Managing trade-offs, such as time investments versus image quality, is crucial for teledermatology implementation and should be assessed from a complexity perspective to understand trade-offs and prevent unintended consequences.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5660/11316153/feed012c8149/derma_v7i1e56723_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5660/11316153/feed012c8149/derma_v7i1e56723_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5660/11316153/feed012c8149/derma_v7i1e56723_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

尽管在 COVID-19 大流行期间全球范围内采用了远程皮肤病学,但较差的病史和照片质量等持续存在的障碍阻碍了其在实践中的有效使用。了解荷兰皮肤科医生在荷兰医疗保健系统中使用远程皮肤病学系统的经验和满意度是必要的。全面评估可以提供有价值的见解,以了解障碍如何相互关联,这对于实践中远程皮肤病学的创新是必要的。

目的

本研究以复杂适应系统的观点为指导,旨在了解荷兰皮肤科医生在 COVID-19 大流行期间接受培训、支持沟通、互动和使用荷兰数字医院的远程皮肤病学平台的经验和满意度,为未来的远程皮肤病学服务提供改进的见解。

方法

2021 年 12 月,向(1)拥有活跃的远程皮肤病学平台账户和(2)在 2019 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 30 日期间回复远程皮肤病学咨询的荷兰皮肤科医生发送了一份基于网络的问卷。该问卷包括经过验证的存储转发远程医疗服务用户满意度问卷(SAF-TSUQ),以及关于以下方面的新问题:远程皮肤病学医生的人口统计学特征、COVID-19 大流行期间远程皮肤病学的使用情况、全科医生(GP)进行远程皮肤病学的表现以及皮肤科医生在远程皮肤病学过程中的角色。对开放式问题进行了扎根理论分析,该分析由社会技术模型指导,并辅以复杂适应系统的观点进行补充。与 3 名皮肤科医生进行了小组讨论,以提供对问卷答复的额外见解。

结果

我们从 249 名受邀皮肤科医生中获得了 25 名(10%)的回复。总体而言,皮肤科医生对远程皮肤病学有积极的体验。有趣的是,远程皮肤病学的使用频率并未受到 COVID-19 大流行的影响。然而,远程皮肤病学咨询的临床内容(照片和病史信息)的质量和完整性不足,影响了远程皮肤病学工作流程的效率。皮肤科医生表示需要改进以避免耗时的流程或物理转诊。小组讨论丰富并证实了答复,建议为全科医生设置必填字段以提供完整的病史。

结论

荷兰皮肤科医生认为远程皮肤病学是提供皮肤病学护理的有价值的工具。然而,为了提高复杂远程皮肤病学系统在荷兰医疗保健中的有效性和效率,有必要改进提供的临床内容的质量和完整性。这可以提高皮肤科医生的满意度和远程皮肤病学服务的质量。从复杂性的角度评估权衡,例如时间投入与图像质量,对于远程皮肤病学的实施至关重要,以了解权衡并防止意外后果。

相似文献

1
An Exploration of Dutch Dermatologists' Experience and Satisfaction With Teledermatology: Sociotechnical and Complex Adaptive System Perspective.从社会技术和复杂适应系统的角度探讨荷兰皮肤科医生对远程皮肤病学的体验和满意度。
JMIR Dermatol. 2024 Jul 26;7:e56723. doi: 10.2196/56723.
2
General Practitioners' Perspectives About Remote Dermatology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Netherlands: Questionnaire-Based Study.荷兰全科医生对新冠疫情期间远程皮肤病护理的看法:基于问卷调查的研究
JMIR Dermatol. 2023 Jun 13;6:e46682. doi: 10.2196/46682.
3
Improving cooperation between general practitioners and dermatologists via telemedicine: study protocol of the cluster-randomized controlled TeleDerm study.通过远程医疗改善全科医生与皮肤科医生之间的合作:整群随机对照TeleDerm研究方案
Trials. 2018 Oct 24;19(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2955-2.
4
Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Teledermatology.患者和提供者对远程皮肤病学的满意度。
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Aug;23(8):684-690. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0192. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
5
Creation of an Internal Teledermatology Store-and-Forward System in an Existing Electronic Health Record: A Pilot Study in a Safety-Net Public Health and Hospital System.在现有电子健康记录中创建内部远程皮肤病学存储转发系统:在安全网公共卫生和医院系统中的一项试点研究。
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jul 1;153(7):644-650. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0204.
6
Teledermatology Platforms Usage and Barriers: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of United States-Based Dermatologists Pre- and Post-COVID-19.远程皮肤病学平台的使用情况和障碍:美国皮肤科医生在 COVID-19 前后的横断面分析。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2024 Feb 1;23(2):e64-e66. doi: 10.36849/JDD.7819.
7
Eleven years of teledermoscopy in the Netherlands: A retrospective quality and performance analysis of 18,738 consultations.荷兰十一年的远程皮肤镜检查:18738 次咨询的回顾性质量和性能分析。
J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Jul;30(6):1037-1046. doi: 10.1177/1357633X221122113. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
8
A pilot study on tertiary teledermatology: feasibility and acceptance of telecommunication among dermatologists. tertiary teledermatology 远程皮肤病学三级服务:皮肤科医生之间通信的可行性和可接受性的初步研究
J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(8):447-53. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.091205. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
9
Evaluating the Experiences of New and Existing Teledermatology Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study.评估新冠疫情期间新老远程皮肤病患者的体验:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Dermatol. 2021 May 5;4(1):e25999. doi: 10.2196/25999. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.
10
Teledermatology in Belgium: a pilot study.比利时的远程皮肤病学:一项试点研究。
Acta Clin Belg. 2020 Apr;75(2):116-122. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2018.1561812. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
General Practitioners' Perspectives About Remote Dermatology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Netherlands: Questionnaire-Based Study.荷兰全科医生对新冠疫情期间远程皮肤病护理的看法:基于问卷调查的研究
JMIR Dermatol. 2023 Jun 13;6:e46682. doi: 10.2196/46682.
2
Automation vs. Innovation: Unexplored Strategies to Improve Virtual Care.自动化与创新:改善虚拟护理的未探索策略。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 Jun 22;304:3-7. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230357.
3
Is primary health care ready for artificial intelligence? What do primary health care stakeholders say?
基层医疗做好迎接人工智能的准备了吗?基层医疗利益相关者怎么说?
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Sep 9;22(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01984-6.
4
Eleven years of teledermoscopy in the Netherlands: A retrospective quality and performance analysis of 18,738 consultations.荷兰十一年的远程皮肤镜检查:18738 次咨询的回顾性质量和性能分析。
J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Jul;30(6):1037-1046. doi: 10.1177/1357633X221122113. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
5
A nationwide study of the incidence and trends of first and multiple basal cell carcinomas in the Netherlands and prediction of future incidence.荷兰全国范围内关于原发性和多发性基底细胞癌的发病率、趋势以及未来发病率预测的研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Mar;186(3):476-484. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20871. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
6
Telehealth utilization during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review.新冠疫情期间的远程医疗应用:一项系统综述。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Nov;138:104878. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104878. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
7
The Impact of COVID-19 on Teledermatology: A Review.《COVID-19 对远程皮肤病学的影响:综述》。
Dermatol Clin. 2021 Oct;39(4):599-608. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 28.
8
Context and Complexity in Telemedicine Evaluation: Work Domain Analysis in a Surgical Setting.远程医疗评估中的背景与复杂性:外科环境中的工作领域分析
JMIR Perioper Med. 2021 Sep 16;4(2):e26580. doi: 10.2196/26580.
9
Teledermatology in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的远程皮肤病学:一项系统综述。
JAAD Int. 2021 Dec;5:54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2021.07.007. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
10
The Store-and-Forward Telemedicine Service User-satisfaction Questionnaire: Development and validation of a questionnaire to monitor and assess health care providers' experiences.存储转发远程医疗服务用户满意度问卷:开发和验证一个问卷,以监测和评估医疗服务提供者的体验。
J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Jan;30(1):131-141. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211032409. Epub 2021 Jul 30.