• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价和荟萃分析在卒中指南中的应用

The Utilization of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Stroke Guidelines.

作者信息

Ghozy Sherief, Kobeissi Hassan, Amoukhteh Melika, Kadirvel Ramanathan, Brinjikji Waleed, Rabinstein Alejandro A, Carpenter Christopher R, Kallmes David F

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 20;14(7):728. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070728.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci14070728
PMID:39061468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11274449/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stroke guideline statements are important references for clinicians due to the rapidly evolving nature of treatments. Guideline statements should be informed by up-to-date systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) because they provide the highest level of evidence. To investigate the utilization of SRs/MAs in stroke management guidelines, we conducted a literature review of guidelines and extracted relevant information regarding SRs/MAs.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted in PubMed with supplementation using the Trip medical database with the term "stroke" as the target population, followed by using the filter "guidelines". We extracted the number of included SRs/MAs, the years of publication, the country of origin, and other characteristics of interest. Descriptive statistics were generated using the R software version 4.2.1.

RESULTS

We included 27 guideline statements. The median number of overall SRs or MAs within the guidelines was 4.0 (interquartile range [IQR] = 2-9). For MAs only, the median number included in the guidelines was 3.0 (IQR = 2.0-5.5). Canadian guidelines had the oldest citations, with a median gap of 12.0 (IQR = 5.2-18.0) years for the oldest citation, followed by European (median = 12; IQR = 9.5-13.5) and US (median = 10.0; IQR = 5.2-16) guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke guideline writing groups and issuing bodies should devote greater effort to the inclusion of up-to-date SRs/MAs in their guideline statements so that clinicians can reference recent data with the highest level of evidence.

摘要

背景

由于治疗方法迅速发展,卒中指南声明对临床医生来说是重要的参考依据。指南声明应以最新的系统评价(SRs)和荟萃分析(MAs)为依据,因为它们提供了最高级别的证据。为了调查SRs/MAs在卒中管理指南中的应用情况,我们对指南进行了文献综述,并提取了有关SRs/MAs的相关信息。

方法

在PubMed中进行文献综述,并使用Trip医学数据库进行补充,以“卒中”为目标人群,随后使用“指南”过滤器。我们提取了纳入的SRs/MAs数量、发表年份、原产国以及其他感兴趣的特征。使用R软件版本4.2.1进行描述性统计。

结果

我们纳入了27份指南声明。指南中总体SRs或MAs的中位数为4.0(四分位间距[IQR]=2-9)。仅对于MAs,指南中纳入的中位数为3.0(IQR=2.0-5.5)。加拿大指南的引用年份最久,最旧引用的中位数差距为12.0(IQR=5.2-18.0)年,其次是欧洲(中位数=12;IQR=9.5-13.5)和美国(中位数=10.0;IQR=5.2-16)指南。

结论

卒中指南编写组和发布机构应更加努力地在其指南声明中纳入最新的SRs/MAs,以便临床医生能够参考具有最高级别证据的最新数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a720/11274449/39f954f5a436/brainsci-14-00728-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a720/11274449/098980bf0e04/brainsci-14-00728-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a720/11274449/39f954f5a436/brainsci-14-00728-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a720/11274449/098980bf0e04/brainsci-14-00728-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a720/11274449/39f954f5a436/brainsci-14-00728-g002a.jpg

相似文献

1
The Utilization of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Stroke Guidelines.系统评价和荟萃分析在卒中指南中的应用
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 20;14(7):728. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070728.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
A citation analysis of systematic review and meta-analysis published in Chinese journals.中文期刊发表的系统评价和荟萃分析的引文分析。
J Evid Based Med. 2012 May;5(2):66-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2012.01175.x.
5
Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.手法治疗膝骨关节炎的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析概述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;11:1081238. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1081238. eCollection 2023.
6
The Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Erectile Dysfunction Treatment and Management Published in the Sexual Medicine Literature.性医学文献中发表的勃起功能障碍治疗和管理的系统评价和荟萃分析的质量。
J Sex Med. 2019 Mar;16(3):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
Conflict of Evidence: Resolving Discrepancies When Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-analyses Disagree.证据冲突:解决随机对照试验和荟萃分析结果不一致时的差异
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):811-819. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.023. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
8
The quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses assessing the treatment and management of male infertility.评估男性不育症治疗与管理的系统评价和荟萃分析的质量。
Andrology. 2021 May;9(3):801-809. doi: 10.1111/andr.12972. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
9
Evidence quality assessment of acupuncture intervention for stroke hemiplegia: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.针刺干预治疗中风偏瘫的证据质量评估:系统评价与Meta分析概述
Front Neurol. 2024 Apr 30;15:1375880. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1375880. eCollection 2024.
10
High variability in results and methodological quality among overlapping systematic reviews on the same topics in surgery: a meta-epidemiological study.手术领域相同主题的重叠系统评价结果和方法学质量存在高度变异性:一项meta 流行病学研究。
Br J Surg. 2021 Dec 1;108(12):1521-1529. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab328.

本文引用的文献

1
Current and future trends in acute ischemic stroke treatment: direct-to-angiography suite, middle vessel occlusion, large core, and minor strokes.急性缺血性卒中治疗的当前及未来趋势:直接进入血管造影室、大脑中动脉闭塞、大面积梗死核心及轻度卒中
Eur J Radiol Open. 2023 Oct 31;11:100536. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100536. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Advancements in the management of acute ischemic stroke: A narrative review.急性缺血性卒中管理的进展:一项叙述性综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Feb 15;4(1):e12896. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12896. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Endovascular thrombectomy after acute ischemic stroke of the basilar artery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials.
基底动脉急性缺血性脑卒中血管内取栓治疗:四项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Dec 21;15(e3):e446-e451. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019776.
4
Trial of Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion.基底动脉闭塞性卒中发病 6 至 24 小时内取栓治疗的试验
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 13;387(15):1373-1384. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207576.
5
Trial of Endovascular Treatment of Acute Basilar-Artery Occlusion.急性基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗试验。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 13;387(15):1361-1372. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206317.
6
From conventional to living guidelines - faster updates for better informed guidance? A scoping review.从传统指南到实时指南——更快更新以提供更明智的指导?一项范围综述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Nov;174:20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
7
The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice.随机对照试验在指导临床实践中的比例。
Elife. 2022 Aug 17;11:e79491. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79491.
8
Clinical practice guidelines: The good, the bad, and the ugly.临床实践指南:优点、缺点与不足之处
Injury. 2023 May;54 Suppl 3:S26-S29. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.047. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
9
Feasibility of national living guideline methods: The Australian Stroke Guidelines.国家生活指南方法的可行性:澳大利亚中风指南。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:184-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.020. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
10
Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019.每天发表近 80 篇系统评价:2000 年至 2019 年流行病学趋势和报告的观察性研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;138:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 Jun 4.