Suppr超能文献

随机对照试验在指导临床实践中的比例。

The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice.

机构信息

Studies of Translation, Ethics and Medicine (STREAM), Dept. of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard, Boston, United States.

出版信息

Elife. 2022 Aug 17;11:e79491. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79491.

Abstract

Prior studies suggest that clinical trials are often hampered by problems in design, conduct, and reporting that limit their uptake in clinical practice. We have described 'informativeness' as the ability of a trial to guide clinical, policy, or research decisions. Little is known about the proportion of initiated trials that inform clinical practice. We created a cohort of randomized interventional clinical trials in three disease areas (ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and lung cancer) that were initiated between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 using ClinicalTrials.gov. We restricted inclusion to trials aimed at answering a clinical question related to the treatment or prevention of disease. Our primary outcome was the proportion of clinical trials fulfilling four conditions of informativeness: importance of the clinical question, trial design, feasibility, and reporting of results. Our study included 125 clinical trials. The proportion meeting four conditions for informativeness was 26.4% (95% CI 18.9-35.0). Sixty-seven percent of participants were enrolled in informative trials. The proportion of informative trials did not differ significantly between our three disease areas. Our results suggest that the majority of randomized interventional trials designed to guide clinical practice possess features that may compromise their ability to do so. This highlights opportunities to improve the scientific vetting of clinical research.

摘要

先前的研究表明,临床试验在设计、实施和报告方面经常存在问题,这限制了它们在临床实践中的应用。我们将“信息性”定义为一项试验指导临床、政策或研究决策的能力。对于启动的试验中有多少能够为临床实践提供信息,人们知之甚少。我们创建了一个由三个疾病领域(缺血性心脏病、糖尿病和肺癌)的随机干预临床试验组成的队列,这些试验是使用 ClinicalTrials.gov 在 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 12 月 31 日期间启动的。我们将纳入标准限制为旨在回答与疾病治疗或预防相关的临床问题的试验。我们的主要结局是满足信息性四项条件的临床试验的比例:临床问题的重要性、试验设计、可行性和结果报告。我们的研究包括 125 项临床试验。满足信息性四项条件的比例为 26.4%(95%CI 18.9-35.0)。67%的参与者参加了信息性试验。我们三个疾病领域的信息性试验比例没有显著差异。我们的结果表明,大多数旨在指导临床实践的随机干预试验具有可能影响其指导能力的特征。这突显了改进临床研究科学审查的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c3/9427100/050ffac2c51a/elife-79491-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验