Bertin Daniel, Babacci Benjamin, Brodovitch Alexandre, Dubrou Cléa, Heim Xavier, Mege Jean Louis, Bardin Nathalie
Service d'Immunologie, Biogénopôle, Hôpital de la Timone, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), 13005 Marseille, France.
Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INRAE, C2VN, 13005 Marseille, France.
Biomedicines. 2024 Jul 12;12(7):1552. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12071552.
The positivity of anti-RNP autoantibodies as biological criteria for the diagnosis of mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) has recently divided the rheumatology community. Autoantigenicity of the U1-snRNP complex tends to generate multiple autoantibodies against RNP-A, -C and -70 KDa or Sm proteins. The aim of this study is to identify the most informative autoantibodies in clinical practice, in particular, to contribute to differential diagnosis between MCTD and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Sera from 74 patients positive for anti-RNP autoantibodies were selected over a period of one year of laboratory practice. Autoantibodies directed against extractable nuclear antigen, RNP proteins (A, C, 70 KDa) and 40 kDa fragments of RNP-70 KDa were investigated by using quantitative fluoroenzymatic assay and Western blot analysis. Among the 74 patients, 40 patients were diagnosed with SLE, 20 with MCTD, six with another autoimmune disease, three with SARS-CoV-2 infection, three with cancer and two were healthy. No preferential clinical association of IgG or IgM autoantibodies directed against each of the RNP proteins was found between SLE and MCTD. In contrast, the proportion of autoantibodies directed against the RNP component within the U1-snRNP complex showed a significantly higher RNP index in patients with MCTD than in those with SLE ( = 0.011), with good performance (sensitivity: 69.2%, specificity: 88.9%). The analysis of the proportion of the different autoantibodies directed against the U1-snRNP complex is more informative than the analysis of each autoantibody separately. A follow-up of patients could be informative about the interest of the RNP index as a predictor of disease evolution.
抗RNP自身抗体作为混合性结缔组织病(MCTD)诊断的生物学标准,最近在风湿病学界引发了分歧。U1 - snRNP复合物的自身抗原性倾向于产生多种针对RNP - A、- C和- 70 KDa或Sm蛋白的自身抗体。本研究的目的是确定临床实践中最具诊断价值的自身抗体,特别是有助于MCTD与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的鉴别诊断。在一年的实验室实践中,选取了74例抗RNP自身抗体阳性患者的血清。采用定量荧光酶法和蛋白质印迹分析,检测针对可提取核抗原、RNP蛋白(A、C、70 KDa)和RNP - 70 KDa的40 kDa片段的自身抗体。在这74例患者中,40例被诊断为SLE,20例为MCTD,6例患有其他自身免疫性疾病,3例感染了SARS-CoV-2,3例患有癌症,2例健康。在SLE和MCTD患者中,未发现针对每种RNP蛋白的IgG或IgM自身抗体有明显的临床相关性。相比之下,U1 - snRNP复合物中针对RNP成分的自身抗体比例显示,MCTD患者的RNP指数显著高于SLE患者(P = 0.011),具有良好的诊断性能(敏感性:69.2%,特异性:88.9%)。分析针对U1 - snRNP复合物的不同自身抗体比例,比单独分析每种自身抗体更具诊断价值。对患者进行随访,可能有助于了解RNP指数作为疾病进展预测指标的意义。