Suppr超能文献

一项针对学龄前儿童样本的三种执行功能测试组合的比较。

A Comparison of Three Executive Function Batteries in a Preschool-Aged Sample.

作者信息

Kuhn Laura J, Camerota Marie, Willoughby Michael T, Blair Clancy

机构信息

FPG Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Center for Developmental Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2024 Jul 2;11(7):811. doi: 10.3390/children11070811.

Abstract

There is great interest in the development of executive function (EF) in the preschool period. Accordingly, multiple performance-based measures of EF have been developed for this age group, yet little is known about how they compare to one another. This study used a large and diverse sample of 3-to-5-year-old children ( = 846), who completed subtests of the National Institutes of Health's Toolbox Cognition Battery (NTCB), the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-IV), and the EF Touch battery. Scores across the three batteries were compared and associations with age, income, and race/ethnicity were examined. Results revealed that (1) the three tasks were moderately correlated ( = 0.44-0.51, all < 0.001), but children had higher mean accuracy scores on EF Touch than on the NTCB or the WPPSI-IV. (2) Mean accuracy scores on all batteries were linearly associated with child age (all > 32.68, all < 0.0001). (3) Comparisons by income and race/ethnicity showed lower accuracy for low-income children on the WPPSI-IV and lower accuracy for White children on the NTCB. Across all batteries, there was consistently lower accuracy for Hispanic children. In conclusion, the three batteries we examined performed similarly across several metrics. EF Touch may be more appropriate for younger children, while the NTCB performed well with older children.

摘要

人们对学前儿童执行功能(EF)的发展极为关注。因此,针对这一年龄段已开发出多种基于表现的执行功能测量方法,但对于它们之间的比较了解甚少。本研究使用了一个由846名3至5岁儿童组成的多样化大样本,这些儿童完成了美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知电池(NTCB)、韦氏学前和小学智力量表(WPPSI-IV)以及执行功能触摸电池的子测试。对这三种电池的得分进行了比较,并考察了与年龄、收入和种族/民族的关联。结果显示:(1)这三项任务具有中等程度的相关性(r = 0.44 - 0.51,均p < 0.001),但儿童在执行功能触摸电池上的平均准确率得分高于在NTCB或WPPSI-IV上的得分。(2)所有电池的平均准确率得分均与儿童年龄呈线性相关(均p > 32.68,均p < 0.0001)。(3)按收入和种族/民族进行的比较显示,低收入儿童在WPPSI-IV上的准确率较低,白人儿童在NTCB上的准确率较低。在所有电池测试中,西班牙裔儿童的准确率始终较低。总之,我们所考察的这三种电池在几个指标上表现相似。执行功能触摸电池可能更适合年幼的儿童,而NTCB在年长儿童中表现良好。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
How do 3-year-olds do on the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery?3 岁儿童在 NIH 工具包认知电池测试中表现如何?
Child Neuropsychol. 2023 May;29(4):521-542. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2022.2100337. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验