• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尝试一种不同的方法:亲社会策略调节了进取型目标和社群型目标对欺凌行为的联合影响。

Giving It a Shot with a Different Approach: Prosocial Strategies Moderate the Joint Effects of Agentic and Communal Goals on Bullying.

作者信息

Wang Yangan, Zhang Qingqin, Dong Zixiao, Zhang Xiangkui

机构信息

School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;14(7):583. doi: 10.3390/bs14070583.

DOI:10.3390/bs14070583
PMID:39062406
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11273542/
Abstract

This study uses polynomial regression and response surface analyses to investigate the joint effects of agentic and communal goals on bullying and the moderating role of prosocial strategies. The sample included 917 adolescents (M = 13.54, = 1.02) from rural, suburban, and urban areas in China. The findings revealed that higher agentic and lower communal goals were associated with a linear rise in bullying. Surprisingly, when both social goals were higher simultaneously, bullying followed an inverted U-shaped pattern. Furthermore, prosocial strategies moderated the joint effects of the two social goals. Adolescents who are more likely to use prosocial strategies do not show significant changes in bullying when both goals are at a higher level. In contrast, those who are less likely to do so show a linear rise in bullying, regardless of changes in social goals. This study improves our understanding and intervention of bullying behavior, emphasizing a non-pathological perspective.

摘要

本研究采用多项式回归和响应面分析,以探讨进取型目标和共享型目标对欺凌行为的联合影响以及亲社会策略的调节作用。样本包括来自中国农村、郊区和城市地区的917名青少年(M = 13.54, = 1.02)。研究结果显示,较高的进取型目标和较低的共享型目标与欺凌行为呈线性上升相关。令人惊讶的是,当两种社会目标同时较高时,欺凌行为呈倒U形模式。此外,亲社会策略调节了两种社会目标的联合影响。更有可能使用亲社会策略的青少年在两种目标都处于较高水平时,欺凌行为没有显著变化。相比之下,那些不太可能这样做的青少年,无论社会目标如何变化,欺凌行为都呈线性上升。本研究增进了我们对欺凌行为的理解和干预,强调了一种非病理学的视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ebc/11273542/6e0573e78e9d/behavsci-14-00583-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ebc/11273542/481f4576392c/behavsci-14-00583-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ebc/11273542/6e0573e78e9d/behavsci-14-00583-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ebc/11273542/481f4576392c/behavsci-14-00583-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ebc/11273542/6e0573e78e9d/behavsci-14-00583-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Giving It a Shot with a Different Approach: Prosocial Strategies Moderate the Joint Effects of Agentic and Communal Goals on Bullying.尝试一种不同的方法:亲社会策略调节了进取型目标和社群型目标对欺凌行为的联合影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;14(7):583. doi: 10.3390/bs14070583.
2
Differences in adolescents' motivations for indirect, direct, and hybrid peer defending.青少年间接、直接和混合式同伴防御动机的差异。
Soc Dev. 2019 May;28(2):414-429. doi: 10.1111/sode.12348. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
3
Forms of Prosocial Behaviors are Differentially Linked to Social Goals and Peer Status in Adolescents.亲社会行为的形式与青少年的社会目标和同伴地位存在不同程度的关联。
J Genet Psychol. 2018 Nov-Dec;179(6):329-342. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2018.1518894. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Agency, communion, and pubertal status: Separating between- and within-person associations to examine social goals development.能动性、交流和青春期状态:通过个体间和个体内关联检验社会目标发展。
J Pers. 2021 Oct;89(5):1095-1107. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12638. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
5
The Silver Lining in the Dark Cloud of Social Status Insecurity: The Mediating Role of Popularity Goals in the Association Between Social Status Insecurity and Chinese Adolescents' Bullying Bystander Behaviors.社会地位不安全感的乌云中的一线希望:受欢迎目标在社会地位不安全感与中国青少年欺凌旁观者行为之间的中介作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP15851-NP15873. doi: 10.1177/08862605211023489. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
6
Pursuit of communal values in an agentic manner: a way to happiness?以能动的方式追求集体价值观:一种通往幸福的途径?
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 18;5:1320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01320. eCollection 2014.
7
Effect of prosocial behavior on school bullying victimization among children and adolescents: Peer and student-teacher relationships as mediators.亲社会行为对儿童和青少年校园欺凌受害情况的影响:以同伴关系和师生关系作为中介变量
J Adolesc. 2023 Feb;95(2):322-335. doi: 10.1002/jad.12116. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
8
Perceived Teacher Unfairness, Instrumental Goals, and Bullying Behavior in Early Adolescence.青少年早期的教师不公平感、工具性目标与欺凌行为
J Interpers Violence. 2014 Jul;29(10):1834-49. doi: 10.1177/0886260513511694. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
9
Classroom Status Hierarchy Moderates the Association between Social Dominance Goals and Bullying Behavior in Middle Childhood and Early Adolescence.课堂地位层级调节了社会支配目标与中童年和青春期早期欺凌行为之间的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Nov;49(11):2285-2297. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01285-z. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
10
Agency and Communion From the Perspective of Self Versus Others: The Moderating Role of Social Class.自我与他人视角下的能动性与交融性:社会阶层的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 18;10:2867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02867. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of the Dutch Meaningful Roles program in children: a study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled study.荷兰有意义角色计划对儿童的有效性:一项群组随机对照研究的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 27;23(1):1440. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16362-8.
2
Bullying and the Abuse of Power.欺凌与权力滥用
Int J Bullying Prev. 2023 Apr 19:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s42380-023-00170-0.
3
Agency, communion, and pubertal status: Separating between- and within-person associations to examine social goals development.
能动性、交流和青春期状态:通过个体间和个体内关联检验社会目标发展。
J Pers. 2021 Oct;89(5):1095-1107. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12638. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
4
Adolescent Social Goal Development: Mean-Level Changes and Prediction by Self-Esteem and Narcissism.青少年社会目标发展:自尊和自恋的平均水平变化及其预测。
J Genet Psychol. 2020 Nov-Dec;181(6):427-442. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2020.1792401. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
5
A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health.基于自我决定理论的健康领域干预研究的元分析:对动机、健康行为、生理和心理健康的影响。
Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Jun;15(2):214-244. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
6
Differences in adolescents' motivations for indirect, direct, and hybrid peer defending.青少年间接、直接和混合式同伴防御动机的差异。
Soc Dev. 2019 May;28(2):414-429. doi: 10.1111/sode.12348. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
7
Why does decreased likeability not deter adolescent bullying perpetrators?为什么减少好感度并没有阻止青少年欺凌者?
Aggress Behav. 2019 May;45(3):348-359. doi: 10.1002/ab.21824. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
8
Characteristics of likability, perceived popularity, and admiration in the early adolescent peer system in the United States and China.美国和中国青少年早期同伴系统中喜欢、感知受欢迎程度和钦佩的特征。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Aug;54(8):1568-1581. doi: 10.1037/dev0000544.
9
How to Attain a Popularity Goal? Examining the Mediation Effects of Popularity Determinants and Behaviors.如何实现受欢迎的目标?检验受欢迎程度决定因素和行为的中介效应。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1842-1852. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0882-x. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
10
Why Interventions to Influence Adolescent Behavior Often Fail but Could Succeed.为何干预青少年行为的措施常常失败,但又可能成功。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jan;13(1):101-122. doi: 10.1177/1745691617722620. Epub 2017 Dec 12.