Santamaria Riccardo, Zaffaroni Mattia, Vincini Maria Giulia, Colombi Lorenzo, Gaeta Aurora, Mastroleo Federico, Corrao Giulia, Zerini Dario, Villa Riccardo, Mazzola Giovanni Carlo, Alessi Sarah, Luzzago Stefano, Mistretta Francesco Alessandro, Musi Gennaro, De Cobelli Ottavio, Gandini Sara, Kuncman Lukasz, Cattani Federica, Ceci Francesco, Petralia Giuseppe, Marvaso Giulia, Jereczek-Fossa Barbara Alicja
Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20139 Milan, Italy.
Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Life (Basel). 2024 Jul 11;14(7):870. doi: 10.3390/life14070870.
Purpose or Objective-The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT on detectable prostate bed recurrence in RT-naïve prostate cancer patients.
Eighty-six patients who underwent SBRT for macroscopic bed recurrence after prostatectomy were retrospectively included. Patients were treated based on mpMRI or choline/PSMA PET.
The median time to biochemical relapse (BCR) after RP was 46 months, with a median PSA at restaging of 1.04 ng/mL. Forty-six patients were staged with mpMRI and choline/PSMA PET, while ten and thirty were treated based on PET and MRI only, respectively. Only one late G ≥ 2 GI toxicity was observed. With a median BCR follow-up of 14 months, twenty-nine patients experienced a BCR with a median PSA at recurrence of 1.66 ng/mL and a median survival free from the event of 40.1 months. The median time to BCR was 17.9 months. Twenty-seven patients had clinical relapse (CR), with a median CR follow-up of 16.27 months and a median time to CR of 23.0 months. Biochemical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 88% and 66%, respectively, while clinical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 92% and 82%, respectively. Regarding local relapses, seven were in the field of treatment, while eight of them were outside the field of treatment.
Data showed that SBRT targeting only the macroscopic bed recurrence instead of the whole prostate bed is safe and effective. Additional data and longer follow-ups will provide a clearer indication of the appropriate treatment and staging methodology for these patients.
目的或目标——本研究的目的是评估立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)对初治前列腺癌患者可检测到的前列腺床复发的疗效和安全性。
回顾性纳入86例前列腺切除术后因肉眼可见的床复发接受SBRT治疗的患者。患者根据多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)或胆碱/前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)进行治疗。
根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发(BCR)的中位时间为46个月,重新分期时的中位前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)为1.04 ng/mL。46例患者通过mpMRI和胆碱/PSMA PET进行分期,而分别有10例和30例仅根据PET和MRI进行治疗。仅观察到1例晚期G≥2级胃肠道毒性。BCR的中位随访时间为14个月,29例患者出现BCR,复发时的中位PSA为1.66 ng/mL,无该事件的中位生存期为40.1个月。BCR的中位时间为17.9个月。27例患者出现临床复发(CR),CR的中位随访时间为16.27个月,CR的中位时间为23.0个月。1年和2年的无生化复发生存率分别为88%和66%,而1年和2年的无临床复发生存率分别为92%和82%。关于局部复发,7例在治疗区域内,而其中8例在治疗区域外。
数据表明,仅针对肉眼可见的床复发而非整个前列腺床进行SBRT是安全有效的。更多数据和更长时间的随访将为这些患者的适当治疗和分期方法提供更清晰的指示。