• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科主动脉瓣置换的新技术与工艺:一项大型回顾性队列分析

Novel Techniques and Technologies for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Large Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

作者信息

Caruso Vincenzo, Bilkhu Rajdeep, Young Christopher, Roxburgh James, Bosco Paolo, Lucchese Gianluca

机构信息

Cardiovascular Department, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 15;13(14):4126. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144126.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13144126
PMID:39064166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11278247/
Abstract

: In an era of growing evidence for transaortic valve implantation (TAVI), our research topic was the evaluation of how surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVRs) are performing in terms of short- and long-term outcomes in different risk categories. : This was a single centre, prospective, and observational cohort study of consecutive patients with aortic valve stenosis, undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement using a biological or mechanical prosthesis, Freestyle™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) graft, homograft, or Ross procedure. The participant data were collected by review of an internal database. The primary endpoints were all-cause operative mortality (in hospital and at 30 days) and late mortality at the follow-up date. The secondary composite endpoint was the incidence of postoperative complications. : 1501 patients underwent SAVR; the mean age was 67 years (SD: 12.6). The in-hospital mortality was 1% ( = 16). At a median follow-up of 60 months, the survival rate was 98.7%. The main predictors for mortality were operative urgency and cardiogenic shock. The overall incidence of PPM was 2.3% ( = 34). Patients who underwent Ross procedure were younger (mean age: 20 years (SD: 1.7)), had a lower incidence of postoperative complications, and were all alive at follow-up. : SAVR shows an excellent survival rate and a low rate of postoperative complications despite an increasing surgical risk. Recent advancements in technology, like sutureless/rapid deployment prostheses and minimally invasive techniques, are shown to have favourable effects on outcomes.

摘要

在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)证据日益增多的时代,我们的研究主题是评估外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)在不同风险类别中的短期和长期结果表现。

这是一项单中心、前瞻性观察队列研究,研究对象为连续的主动脉瓣狭窄患者,他们接受了使用生物或机械假体、Freestyle™(美敦力公司,美国明尼阿波利斯,MN)移植物、同种异体移植物或罗斯手术的单纯主动脉瓣置换术。通过审查内部数据库收集参与者数据。主要终点是全因手术死亡率(住院期间和30天时)以及随访日期的晚期死亡率。次要复合终点是术后并发症的发生率。

1501例患者接受了SAVR;平均年龄为67岁(标准差:12.6)。住院死亡率为1%(n = 16)。在中位随访60个月时,生存率为98.7%。死亡率的主要预测因素是手术紧迫性和心源性休克。永久起搏器植入(PPM)的总体发生率为2.3%(n = 34)。接受罗斯手术的患者更年轻(平均年龄:20岁(标准差:1.7)),术后并发症发生率更低,且随访时全部存活。

尽管手术风险增加,但SAVR显示出优异的生存率和较低的术后并发症发生率。技术上的最新进展,如无缝合/快速部署假体和微创技术,已被证明对结果有有利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e766/11278247/495b03c48ad6/jcm-13-04126-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e766/11278247/259a102b753c/jcm-13-04126-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e766/11278247/495b03c48ad6/jcm-13-04126-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e766/11278247/259a102b753c/jcm-13-04126-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e766/11278247/495b03c48ad6/jcm-13-04126-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Novel Techniques and Technologies for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Large Retrospective Cohort Analysis.外科主动脉瓣置换的新技术与工艺:一项大型回顾性队列分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 15;13(14):4126. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144126.
2
3
Conduction disorders and impact on survival after sutureless aortic valve replacement compared to conventional stented bioprostheses.与传统带支架生物瓣比较,无缝合主动脉瓣置换术后传导障碍与生存影响。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jun 1;55(6):1168-1173. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy417.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.对于手术风险较低的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者,经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 20;12(12):CD013319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013319.pub2.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗低手术风险的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Nov 2;20(14):1-148. eCollection 2020.
6
Aortic valve replacement using stented or sutureless/rapid deployment prosthesis via either full-sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach: a network meta-analysis.采用带支架或无缝合/快速植入人工瓣膜,经全胸骨切开术或微创入路进行主动脉瓣置换术:一项网状荟萃分析
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Sep;9(5):347-363. doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-surd-17.
7
Sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valves in elderly patients with aortic stenosis at intermediate risk: A multi-institutional study.经导管主动脉瓣与无缝合主动脉瓣在中危老年主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的应用:一项多机构研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Mar;163(3):925-935.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.179. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
8
Aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoracotomy: can sutureless technology improve clinical outcomes?经右前侧小切口行主动脉瓣置换术:无缝合技术能否改善临床结局?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;98(5):1585-92. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.092. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
9
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with a sutureless valve through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients.高危患者经右前侧小切口行无缝线瓣膜微创主动脉瓣置换术与经导管主动脉瓣植入术的比较
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar;49(3):960-5. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv210. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
10
History, development and clinical perspectives of sutureless and rapid deployment surgical aortic valve replacement.无缝合及快速植入式外科主动脉瓣置换术的历史、发展及临床展望
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Sep;9(5):375-385. doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-surd-18.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes in asymptomatic, severe aortic stenosis.无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄的结局。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):e0249610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249610. eCollection 2021.
2
Emergency TAVI in a critically ill patient: A case report.危重症患者的急诊经导管主动脉瓣植入术:一例病例报告。
Clin Case Rep. 2020 Dec 31;9(2):1024-1026. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.3732. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.主动脉瓣置换术治疗严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄:无缝合 versus 传统生物瓣。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;161(3):920-932. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.162. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
4
Patient survival in severe low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis after aortic valve replacement or conservative management.主动脉瓣置换或保守治疗后严重低流量、低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的生存率
J Card Surg. 2021 Mar;36(3):1030-1039. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15209. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
5
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020 ACC/AHA 瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e35-e71. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000932. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
Patients' characteristics and mortality in urgent/emergent/salvage transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insight from the OCEAN-TAVI registry.紧急/急诊/挽救性经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的特征和死亡率:来自 OCEAN-TAVI 登记研究的观察。
Open Heart. 2020 Dec;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001467.
7
Quality of Life After Ministernotomy Versus Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement.微创胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术主动脉瓣置换术后的生活质量。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;33(2):328-334. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
8
Mini-sternotomy vs right anterior thoracotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的胸骨下段小切口与右前外侧开胸手术对比
J Card Surg. 2020 Jul;35(7):1570-1582. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14607.
9
An alarming rise in incidence of infective endocarditis in England since 2009: why?自2009年以来,英国感染性心内膜炎的发病率急剧上升:原因何在?
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1325-1327. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30530-4.
10
Contemporary Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Japan.日本主动脉瓣置换术的当代结果。
Circ J. 2020 Jan 24;84(2):277-282. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0674. Epub 2020 Jan 11.