• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压药物治疗试验综述

Drug treatment trials in hypertension: a review.

作者信息

Cutler J A, Furberg C D

出版信息

Prev Med. 1985 Jul;14(4):499-518. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(85)90010-6.

DOI:10.1016/0091-7435(85)90010-6
PMID:3906629
Abstract

Thirteen controlled clinical trials (11 randomized) reporting morbidity and mortality results during 1960-1982 are summarized. Given the diverse design features, results are presented both for individual trials and for several combinations of similar studies, to provide more stable estimates of effects. Two of three trials in severe hypertension, while lacking enough events to evaluate effect on mortality, found significant reductions in "hypertensive" events, with the overall estimate being an 80% reduction. Similarly, combining six trials in less severe hypertension with untreated controls showed a 54% reduction in such events. The favorable trend in all-causes mortality from these trial results, whether viewed separately or in combination, was not significant. However, the findings from a large randomized trial with community controls, the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program, indicated significant reduction of all-causes mortality, the magnitude of which was consistent with the other trials. Outcomes of hypertensive participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial raised questions about mortality benefits in certain subgroups. These and other issues about patient benefit are further addressed with trial data and reference to the 1984 Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. We note also 1) that evidence for reduction of coronary heart disease death or nonfatal myocardial infarction with antihypertensive drug treatment is weak, perhaps due to inadequate power to detect such a difference, and that data are limited regarding effects on quality of life. Nevertheless, the overall trial results provide strong support for drug treatment of severe hypertension, and for most individuals with less severe hypertension, when nonpharmacologic treatment will not suffice.

摘要

本文总结了1960年至1982年间报告发病率和死亡率结果的13项对照临床试验(11项随机试验)。考虑到设计特点的多样性,本文分别给出了各个试验以及相似研究的几种组合的结果,以便更稳定地估计治疗效果。三项重度高血压试验中的两项,虽然缺乏足够的事件来评估对死亡率的影响,但发现“高血压”事件显著减少,总体估计减少了80%。同样,将六项轻度高血压试验与未治疗的对照组相结合,此类事件减少了54%。无论单独还是综合来看,这些试验结果中全因死亡率的有利趋势并不显著。然而,一项以社区为对照的大型随机试验——高血压检测与随访计划——的结果表明全因死亡率显著降低,其降低幅度与其他试验一致。多重危险因素干预试验中高血压参与者的结果引发了关于某些亚组死亡率获益的问题。本文利用试验数据并参考1984年全国高血压检测、评估与治疗联合委员会的报告,进一步探讨了这些以及其他关于患者获益的问题。我们还注意到:1)抗高血压药物治疗降低冠心病死亡或非致命性心肌梗死的证据不足,可能是由于检测这种差异的能力不足,而且关于对生活质量影响的数据有限。尽管如此,总体试验结果为重度高血压的药物治疗提供了有力支持,对于大多数轻度高血压患者,当非药物治疗不足时也是如此。

相似文献

1
Drug treatment trials in hypertension: a review.高血压药物治疗试验综述
Prev Med. 1985 Jul;14(4):499-518. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(85)90010-6.
2
Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group.高血压患者随机接受多沙唑嗪与氯噻酮治疗后的主要心血管事件:抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT)。ALLHAT协作研究组
JAMA. 2000 Apr 19;283(15):1967-75.
3
A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial.钙拮抗剂与非钙拮抗剂治疗冠心病患者高血压的策略。国际维拉帕米-群多普利研究(INVEST):一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2003 Dec 3;290(21):2805-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.21.2805.
4
Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study. Final results. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study Research Group.轻度高血压治疗研究。最终结果。轻度高血压治疗研究组
JAMA. 1993 Aug 11;270(6):713-24.
5
Baseline rest electrocardiographic abnormalities, antihypertensive treatment, and mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.多重危险因素干预试验中的基线静息心电图异常、抗高血压治疗与死亡率。多重危险因素干预试验研究组
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Jan 1;55(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90290-5.
6
Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide vs chlorthalidone combined with azilsartan medoxomil.氢氯噻嗪与氯噻酮联合奥美沙坦酯的降压疗效。
Am J Med. 2012 Dec;125(12):1229.e1-1229.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.05.023. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
7
Controlled clinical trials of drug treatment for hypertension. A review.高血压药物治疗的对照临床试验。综述。
Hypertension. 1989 May;13(5 Suppl):I36-44. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.13.5_suppl.i36.
8
Relationship of antihypertensive treatment regimens and change in blood pressure to risk for heart failure in hypertensive patients randomly assigned to doxazosin or chlorthalidone: further analyses from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial.随机分配接受多沙唑嗪或氯噻酮治疗的高血压患者中,降压治疗方案及血压变化与心力衰竭风险的关系:抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验的进一步分析
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):313-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_part_1-200209030-00006.
9
[Calcium antagonists in cardiovascular disease. Clinical evidence from morbidity and mortality trials].[心血管疾病中的钙拮抗剂。发病率和死亡率试验的临床证据]
Drugs. 2000;59 Spec No 2:25-37.
10
Cochrane in context: pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.Cochrane背景下:儿童高血压的药物干预
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):581-3. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1975.

引用本文的文献

1
Progress in the 1980s and new directions in the 1990s with hypertension management. From the stepped-care approach to the individualised programme in hypertension treatment and control.
Drugs. 1992 Jan;43(1):1-5. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199243010-00001.