Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.
Cancer Biol Med. 2024 Jul 26;21(9):799-812. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0036.
Little progress has been made in recent years using first-line chemotherapy, including gemcitabine combined with nab-paclitaxel, FOLFIRINOX, and NALIRIFOX, for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APC). In addition, the optimal second-line chemotherapy regimen has not been determined. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of second-line chemotherapy for APC.
Patients with APC who received first-line treatment from January 2008 to January 2021 were considered eligible for this retrospective analysis. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively.
Four hundred and thirty-seven and 617 patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment, respectively. Demographic and clinical features, except age and liver metastasis, were comparable between the two groups ( < 0.05). The median OS was 8.8 and 7.8 months in patients who received a 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based combined regimen for first-line therapy, respectively (HR = 1.244, 95% CI = 1.090-1.419; < 0.001). The median OS was 5.6 and 1.9 months in patients who received second-line chemotherapy and supportive care, respectively (HR = 0.766, 95% CI = 0.677-0.867; < 0.001). The median PFS was not significantly differently between gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil monotherapy and combination therapy.
A 5-fluorouracil- or gemcitabine-based combined regimen was shown to be as effective as a single 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine regimen as second-line therapy for patients with APC.
近年来,吉西他滨联合 nab-紫杉醇、FOLFIRINOX 和 NALIRIFOX 等一线化疗方案在晚期胰腺腺癌(APC)中的应用进展甚微。此外,尚未确定最佳的二线化疗方案。本研究旨在比较 APC 二线化疗的不同类型的疗效。
符合本回顾性分析条件的患者为 2008 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月接受一线治疗的 APC 患者。主要和次要终点分别为总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。
分别有 437 例和 617 例患者接受了氟尿嘧啶和吉西他滨为基础的一线治疗。两组患者的人口统计学和临床特征除年龄和肝转移外均无差异(<0.05)。接受氟尿嘧啶和吉西他滨联合方案一线治疗的患者中位 OS 分别为 8.8 个月和 7.8 个月(HR=1.244,95%CI=1.090-1.419;<0.001)。接受二线化疗和支持治疗的患者中位 OS 分别为 5.6 个月和 1.9 个月(HR=0.766,95%CI=0.677-0.867;<0.001)。吉西他滨或氟尿嘧啶单药治疗与联合治疗的中位 PFS 无显著差异。
与氟尿嘧啶或吉西他滨单药治疗相比,氟尿嘧啶或吉西他滨联合方案作为 APC 患者的二线治疗同样有效。