College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48(th) St., Springdale, AR 72762, USA.
College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48(th) St., Springdale, AR 72762, USA.
Vaccine. 2024 Aug 13;42(20):126135. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.07.036. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
The WHO SAGE vaccine hesitancy working group defined vaccine hesitancy as the delay or refusal of vaccination. Questions about individuals who become vaccinated while hesitant, or remain unvaccinated even though they are not hesitant, are unimaginable when starting from this behaviorally related definition of vaccine hesitancy. More critically, behaviorally related definitions limit the possibilities for vaccine hesitancy research to be translatable into clinical and public health practices that can increase vaccination.
Emerging research on hesitant adopters provides several lessons for the conceptualization of vaccine hesitancy and how practitioners might increase vaccination. Conceptualizations of vaccine hesitancy must account for some of the big lessons we have learned from hesitant adopters: (1) vaccine hesitancy and vaccination co-occur for many; (2) vaccine hesitancy may not always be characterized by a punctuated point-in-time or moment; and (3) following from the second lesson, vaccine hesitancy may not be temporally bound to the moments preceding a vaccination decision.
We recommend conceptualizing vaccine-hesitant attitudes as distinctive from behaviors, and not temporally bound to moments preceding vaccination decisions. Sharpening the use of vaccine hesitancy and its temporal characteristics could benefit from engagement with the Life Course Paradigm. We recommend healthcare professionals provide a recommendation even when individuals express hesitancy. Finally, we recommend public health officials consider ways to improve the frequency and consistency of provider recommendations even among patients who are hesitant.
世界卫生组织疫苗犹豫专家工作组将疫苗犹豫定义为推迟或拒绝接种疫苗。从这种与行为相关的疫苗犹豫定义出发,对于那些犹豫不决但仍接种疫苗的个体,或者那些虽然犹豫不决但仍未接种疫苗的个体,提出疑问是不可思议的。更关键的是,与行为相关的定义限制了疫苗犹豫研究转化为能够增加疫苗接种率的临床和公共卫生实践的可能性。
对犹豫不决的接种者的新兴研究为疫苗犹豫的概念化以及从业者如何增加疫苗接种率提供了一些经验教训。疫苗犹豫的概念化必须考虑到我们从犹豫不决的接种者那里学到的一些重要经验:(1)对于许多人来说,疫苗犹豫和接种同时存在;(2)疫苗犹豫并不总是以一个特定的时间点或时刻为特征;(3)从第二个经验教训来看,疫苗犹豫并不一定与接种决策之前的时刻有关。
我们建议将疫苗犹豫的态度与行为区分开来,并且不局限于接种决策之前的时刻。通过与生命历程范式的结合,更精确地使用疫苗犹豫及其时间特征可能会带来益处。我们建议医疗保健专业人员即使在个人表示犹豫时也要提供建议。最后,我们建议公共卫生官员考虑如何提高即使在犹豫不决的患者中也能更频繁和一致地提供建议。