Cartilage thickness in the medial compartment of the knee joint evaluated by MRI three-dimensional analysis correlates with weight-bearing line ratio and joint line convergence angle.

PURPOSE

The correlation between cartilage thickness evaluated by 3D MRI and knee alignment has not been elucidated. The study's purpose was to retrospectively verify whether average cartilage thickness calculated by the automatic MRI 3D analysis system for each subregion was correlated with knee alignment.

METHODS

A total of 53 patients underwent medial meniscus repair or high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis. Cartilage thickness was automatically calculated using 3D MRI software. Knee alignment, weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were calculated on a weight-bearing long-leg radiograph using digital planning software. The association between knee alignment and the average cartilage thickness at 18 subregions in the medial femoral condyle (MFC) and medial tibial plateau (MTP) was evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Cartilage thickness of the MFC had moderately positive correlations with WBLR at four subregions and weak correlations at two subregions. Cartilage thickness of the MTP had moderately positive correlations with WBLR at four subregions. Cartilage thickness of the MFC had moderately negative correlations with JLCA at six subregions. Cartilage thickness of the MTP had moderately negative correlations with JLCA at four subregions and a weak correlation at one subregion. Conversely, cartilage thickness had weak correlations with MPTA or LDFA.

CONCLUSIONS

In knees with pathological conditions in the medial compartment, cartilage thicknesses by 3D MRI had positive correlations with WBLR and JLCA at almost all subregions of the MFC and at the anterior-middle and central-external of the MTP. Treatment strategies should be considered in light of these regions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cross-sectional study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.