• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Perceptions, experiences, and motivation of COVID-19 vaccine trial participants in South Africa: a qualitative study.南非新冠疫苗试验参与者的认知、经历及动机:一项定性研究
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024 Jul 29;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-024-00148-6.
2
Participant views and experiences of participating in HIV research in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区参与者对参与艾滋病病毒研究的看法和经历:一项定性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):330-420. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2051.
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
4
Informed consent and participant perceptions of influenza vaccine trials in South Africa.南非流感疫苗试验中的知情同意与参与者认知
J Med Ethics. 2005 Dec;31(12):727-32. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009910.
5
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
6
Guardians and research staff experiences and views about the consent process in hospital-based paediatric research studies in urban Malawi: A qualitative study.监护人及研究人员对马拉维城市医院儿科研究中知情同意过程的经验和看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00865-x.
7
Researcher and study participants' perspectives of consent in clinical studies in four referral hospitals in Vietnam.越南四家转诊医院内临床研究中同意书的研究人员和研究参与者观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jan 10;21(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-0445-z.
8
Comprehension of informed consent and voluntary participation in registration cohorts for phase IIb HIV vaccine trial in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania: a qualitative descriptive study.在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆进行的 IIb 期 HIV 疫苗试验注册队列中,知情同意和自愿参与的理解:一项定性描述性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 13;25(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01033-z.
9
A Comparison of the Quality of Informed Consent for Clinical Trials of an Experimental Hookworm Vaccine Conducted in Developed and Developing Countries.在发达国家和发展中国家开展的实验性钩虫疫苗临床试验中知情同意质量的比较
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jan 23;11(1):e0005327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005327. eCollection 2017 Jan.
10
"A Question of Trust" and "a Leap of Faith"-Study Participants' Perspectives on Consent, Privacy, and Trust in Smart Home Research: Qualitative Study.《信任的问题》和《信仰的飞跃》——智能家居研究中参与者对同意、隐私和信任的看法:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 26;9(11):e25227. doi: 10.2196/25227.

本文引用的文献

1
Nursing Roles in the Quality of Information in Informed Consent Forms of a Spanish County Hospital.西班牙某县级医院知情同意书中信息质量方面的护理角色
Nurs Rep. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):89-98. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14010008.
2
Consenting in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间的同意行为。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Jan-Feb;74:129-131. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.05.010. Epub 2023 May 22.
3
Research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients' perspectives.在大流行期间的研究招募和同意方法:一项关于 COVID-19 患者观点的定性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 May 11;23(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01933-5.
4
Formal Quality and Compliance of Informed Consent Forms in Critical Care and Surgical Areas in Spain: An Observational Study.西班牙重症监护和手术领域知情同意书的形式质量与合规性:一项观察性研究。
Nurs Rep. 2022 Dec 31;13(1):43-50. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13010004.
5
Rethinking informed consent in the time of COVID-19: An exploratory survey.新冠疫情下对知情同意的重新思考:一项探索性调查。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 27;9:995688. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.995688. eCollection 2022.
6
Factors Influencing Participation in COVID-19 Clinical Trials: A Multi-National Study.影响参与新型冠状病毒肺炎临床试验的因素:一项多国研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 23;8:608959. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.608959. eCollection 2021.
7
Perceptions and attitudes to clinical research participation in Qatar.卡塔尔对参与临床研究的认知与态度。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Nov 1;8:241-247. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.10.010. eCollection 2017 Dec.
8
Rigor or Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Strategies, Reconceptualization, and Recommendations.定性研究中的严谨性或可靠性与有效性:观点、策略、重新概念化及建议
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;36(4):253-263. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000253.
9
Clinical trials in low and middle-income countries - Successes and challenges.低收入和中等收入国家的临床试验——成功与挑战
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2016 Nov 25;19:5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2016.11.007. eCollection 2017 Feb.
10
Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: systematic review and meta-analysis.三十多年来参与者对临床试验中知情同意的理解:系统评价与荟萃分析
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Mar 1;93(3):186-98H. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.141390. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

南非新冠疫苗试验参与者的认知、经历及动机:一项定性研究

Perceptions, experiences, and motivation of COVID-19 vaccine trial participants in South Africa: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Nkosi Thandeka, Mulopo Chanelle, Schmidt Bey-Marrié

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Cape Town, South Africa.

Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024 Jul 29;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-024-00148-6.

DOI:10.1186/s41073-024-00148-6
PMID:39069626
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11285467/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The informed consent process is an important step in conducting ethical clinical trials, as it ensures that research participants are aware of their rights and responsibilities in clinical trials. This study explored participants' perceptions, experiences and the factors motivating their participation in a COVID-19 vaccine trial in South Africa.

METHODS

This descriptive qualitative study was conducted among twenty-five adult participants (18 to 64 years old) who participated in a COVID-19 vaccine trial in South Africa. Three focus group discussions and fifteen semi-structured interviews were carried out. Data were collected at a Clinical Research Site located in Prince Mshiyeni Memorial Hospital, in Umlazi Township, Durban, South Africa, where the COVID-19 vaccine trial participants were initially enrolled. Data were analysed iteratively using a thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

Four key findings emerged: 1) Participants who experienced an event (such as tested positive for COVID-19) during the clinical trial were more likely to talk about the informed consent more thoroughly compared to the other participants. 2) Participants understood the purpose of informed consent process better when it was repeated multiple times throughout the course of the trial. 3) Where participants did not recall or understand various elements of the informed consent, participants were likely to create their own interpretations. 4) Factors influencing participations in trials were reimbursement for participation, access to health care, protection of family members, and ability to socialize without fear of COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the findings show that the informed consent process should be regarded as an ongoing process rather than a once-off event that only happens at the start of a clinical trial. An understanding of participants' perspectives, experiences, and motivations for participating in clinical trials, can help trial staff strengthen the consent documents and processes.

摘要

背景

知情同意程序是开展符合伦理的临床试验的重要一步,因为它确保研究参与者了解自己在临床试验中的权利和责任。本研究探讨了南非参与新冠疫苗试验的参与者的认知、经历以及促使他们参与试验的因素。

方法

本描述性定性研究在25名成年参与者(18至64岁)中进行,他们参与了南非的一项新冠疫苗试验。开展了三次焦点小组讨论和15次半结构化访谈。数据在位于南非德班乌姆拉齐镇王子姆希耶尼纪念医院的一个临床研究点收集,新冠疫苗试验参与者最初在此登记入组。采用主题分析法对数据进行迭代分析。

结果

出现了四项关键发现:1)与其他参与者相比,在临床试验期间经历过某一事件(如新冠病毒检测呈阳性)的参与者更有可能更全面地谈论知情同意。2)当在试验过程中多次重复知情同意程序时,参与者能更好地理解其目的。3)当参与者不记得或不理解知情同意的各项内容时,他们可能会自行作出解释。4)影响参与试验的因素包括参与试验的报酬、获得医疗保健、家庭成员的保护以及能够在无惧新冠病毒的情况下社交。

结论

总体而言,研究结果表明,知情同意程序应被视为一个持续的过程,而非仅在临床试验开始时发生的一次性事件。了解参与者参与临床试验的观点、经历和动机,有助于试验工作人员强化同意书和程序。