J Hist Ideas. 2024;85(3):509-537. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2024.a933857.
This essay explores hitherto unnoticed conceptual transactions between reflections on scientific method and a rethinking of political-economic categories in early-nineteenth century Britain through the writings of William Whewell and Richard Jones. Closely examining personal correspondences between Whewell and Jones, their works, contemporary debates on political economy and the problem of scientific method, Jones's pedagogic practices, Karl Marx's engagements with Jones, and his receptions as a teacher of political economy in colonial governance and imperial education, I argue that Jones drew upon Whewell's philosophical considerations on the relation between "fact" and "idea," to reconstitute the epistemological orientation of political economy.
本文通过威廉·惠威尔和理查德·琼斯的著作,探讨了 19 世纪早期英国对科学方法的反思与对政治经济学范畴的重新思考之间迄今未被注意到的概念转换。本文通过仔细考察惠威尔和琼斯之间的个人通信、他们的著作、当时关于政治经济学和科学方法问题的争论、琼斯的教学实践、卡尔·马克思与琼斯的接触以及他作为政治经济学教师在殖民地治理和帝国教育中的接受情况,我认为琼斯借鉴了惠威尔关于“事实”和“观念”之间关系的哲学思考,重新构建了政治经济学的认识论取向。