Wang Haowen, Deng Min, Cheng Dexin, Feng Rui, Liu Hanbo, Hu Tingyang, Liu Dongdong, Chen Cheng, Zhu Peilin, Shen Jian
Interventional Radiology Department, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 4;14:1392213. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1392213. eCollection 2024.
Through preoperative localization, surgeons can easily locate ground glass nodules (GGNs) and effectively control the extent of resection. Therefore, it is necessary to choose an appropriate puncture positioning method. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of medical glue and positioning hooks in the preoperative positioning of GGNs and to provide a reference for clinical selection.
From March 30, 2020 to June 13, 2022, a total of 859 patients with a CT diagnosis of GGNs requiring surgical resection were included in our study at the hospital. Among them, 21 patients who either opted out or could not undergo preoperative localization for various reasons were excluded. Additionally, 475 patients who underwent preoperative localization using medical glue and 363 patients who underwent preoperative localization through positioning hooks were also excluded. We conducted statistical analyses on the baseline data, success rates, complications, and pathological results of the remaining patients. The success rates, complication rates, and pathological results were compared between the two groups-those who received medical glue localization and those who received positioning hook localization.
There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of patients in terms of age, body mass index, smoking history, location of the nodule, distance of the nodule from the pleura, or postoperative pathological results ( > 0.05). The success rate of medical glue and positioning hooks was 100%. The complication rates of medical glue and positioning hooks during single nodule positioning were 39.18% and 23.18%, respectively, which were significantly different ( < 0.001); the complication rates during multiple nodule positioning were 49.15% and 49.18%, respectively, with no statistically significant differences ( > 0.05). In addition, the method of positioning and the clinical characteristics of the patients were not found to be independent risk factors for the occurrence of complications. The detection rate of pulmonary nodules also showed some positive correlation with the spread of COVID-19 during the 2020-2022 period when COVID-19 was prevalent.
When positioning a single node, the safety of positioning hooks is greater than when positioning multiple nodes, the safety of medical glue and positioning hooks is comparable, and the appropriate positioning method should be chosen according to the individual situation of the patient.
通过术前定位,外科医生能够轻松找到磨玻璃结节(GGNs)并有效控制切除范围。因此,选择合适的穿刺定位方法很有必要。本研究的目的是评估医用胶水和定位钩在GGNs术前定位中的有效性和安全性,为临床选择提供参考。
2020年3月30日至2022年6月13日,我院共纳入859例经CT诊断为需手术切除的GGNs患者。其中,21例因各种原因选择退出或无法进行术前定位的患者被排除。此外,475例行医用胶水术前定位的患者和363例行定位钩术前定位的患者也被排除。我们对其余患者的基线数据、成功率、并发症及病理结果进行了统计分析。比较了接受医用胶水定位和接受定位钩定位的两组患者的成功率、并发症发生率及病理结果。
两组患者在年龄、体重指数、吸烟史、结节位置、结节距胸膜距离或术后病理结果方面无统计学显著差异(>0.05)。医用胶水和定位钩的成功率均为100%。单结节定位时医用胶水和定位钩的并发症发生率分别为39.18%和23.18%,差异有统计学意义(<0.001);多结节定位时并发症发生率分别为49.15%和49.18%,无统计学显著差异(>0.05)。此外,未发现定位方法和患者临床特征是并发症发生的独立危险因素。在2020 - 2022年新冠疫情流行期间,肺结节的检出率也与新冠病毒传播呈一定正相关。
单结节定位时,定位钩的安全性高于多结节定位时,医用胶水和定位钩的安全性相当,应根据患者个体情况选择合适的定位方法。