Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations.

INTRODUCTION

This article presents a review of current concepts of gender identity under normal and pathological conditions.

AIM

To analyse the impact of the medical and social paradigm shift for clinical practice.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The modern academic literature devoted to gender identity disorders is characterized by a variety of terminology, a shift in emphasis from clinical judgement to a socially beneficial normocentric approach and a relatively few advanced, evidence-based research. There is also a lack of evidence for the gender theory underlying the new approach, which raises serious doubts about the validity of the medical and social paradigm revision. In the same time, the position of Russian psychiatrists remains to be more clinically oriented.

CONCLUSION

Patients who declare the desire to reassign their gender have to be assessed by psychiatrists for differential diagnosis to exclude a mental disorder. In such cases, the destigmatization of mental disorders is more critical than the depathologization of gender identity disorders.