Reed Geoffrey M, Sharan Pratap, Rebello Tahilia J, Keeley Jared W, Elena Medina-Mora María, Gureje Oye, Luis Ayuso-Mateos José, Kanba Shigenobu, Khoury Brigitte, Kogan Cary S, Krasnov Valery N, Maj Mario, de Jesus Mari Jair, Stein Dan J, Zhao Min, Akiyama Tsuyoshi, Andrews Howard F, Asevedo Elson, Cheour Majda, Domínguez-Martínez Tecelli, El-Khoury Joseph, Fiorillo Andrea, Grenier Jean, Gupta Nitin, Kola Lola, Kulygina Maya, Leal-Leturia Itziar, Luciano Mario, Lusu Bulumko, Nicolas J, Martínez-López I, Matsumoto Chihiro, Umukoro Onofa Lucky, Paterniti Sabrina, Purnima Shivani, Robles Rebeca, Sahu Manoj K, Sibeko Goodman, Zhong Na, First Michael B, Gaebel Wolfgang, Lovell Anne M, Maruta Toshimasa, Roberts Michael C, Pike Kathleen M
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, Mexico.
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):174-186. doi: 10.1002/wps.20524.
Reliable, clinically useful, and globally applicable diagnostic classification of mental disorders is an essential foundation for global mental health. The World Health Organization (WHO) is nearing completion of the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11). The present study assessed inter-diagnostician reliability of mental disorders accounting for the greatest proportion of global disease burden and the highest levels of service utilization - schizophrenia and other primary psychotic disorders, mood disorders, anxiety and fear-related disorders, and disorders specifically associated with stress - among adult patients presenting for treatment at 28 participating centers in 13 countries. A concurrent joint-rater design was used, focusing specifically on whether two clinicians, relying on the same clinical information, agreed on the diagnosis when separately applying the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines. A total of 1,806 patients were assessed by 339 clinicians in the local language. Intraclass kappa coefficients for diagnoses weighted by site and study prevalence ranged from 0.45 (dysthymic disorder) to 0.88 (social anxiety disorder) and would be considered moderate to almost perfect for all diagnoses. Overall, the reliability of the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines was superior to that previously reported for equivalent ICD-10 guidelines. These data provide support for the suitability of the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for implementation at a global level. The findings will inform further revision of the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines prior to their publication and the development of programs to support professional training and implementation of the ICD-11 by WHO member states.
可靠、临床实用且全球适用的精神障碍诊断分类是全球精神卫生的重要基础。世界卫生组织(WHO)即将完成《国际疾病及相关健康问题分类》(ICD - 11)的第11次修订。本研究评估了在13个国家的28个参与中心接受治疗的成年患者中,占全球疾病负担比例最大且服务利用率最高的精神障碍——精神分裂症及其他原发性精神障碍、心境障碍、焦虑和恐惧相关障碍,以及与压力特别相关的障碍——的诊断医师间信度。采用了同步联合评估者设计,特别关注两名临床医生在分别应用ICD - 11诊断指南时,基于相同临床信息是否能就诊断达成一致。共有339名临床医生用当地语言对1806名患者进行了评估。按地点和研究患病率加权的诊断的组内kappa系数范围为0.45(恶劣心境障碍)至0.88(社交焦虑障碍),所有诊断的信度可认为从中度到几乎完美。总体而言,ICD - 11诊断指南的信度优于先前报告的等效ICD - 10指南。这些数据为ICD - 11诊断指南在全球层面实施的适用性提供了支持。研究结果将为ICD - 11诊断指南在发布前的进一步修订以及世卫组织成员国支持专业培训和ICD - 11实施的项目开发提供参考。