Suppr超能文献

儿科常用的四种通气管的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparison of four ventilation tubes commonly used in the pediatric population: A retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Morrissette Margareta, Ben-Dov Tom, Santacatterina Michele, Catháin Éadaoin Ó, April Max M

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA.

Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Jul 27;9(4):e1306. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1306. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess differences in otorrhea, tympanic membrane perforation, and time to extrusion in children receiving one of four commonly used, short-term ventilation tubes for the first time.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 2 years of postoperative follow-up to analyze patient outcomes after insertion of either a Paparella type-I Activent, Armstrong Beveled, Modified Armstrong, or Armstrong Microgel ventilation tube. Incidence of complications was determined by reviewing provider notes. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine odds ratios of complications among the four tube types.

RESULTS

A total of 387 patients were reviewed. The mean age was 2.4 years and 35.9% were female. Armstrong beveled tubes had the highest odds of otorrhea. Paparella type-I tube had the shortest time to extrusion of about 9 months, while Armstrong Beveled had the longest, at almost 19 months. When evaluating episodes of otorrhea each child experienced on average, per month, Armstrong beveled tubes had the highest monthly rate of otorrhea and Paparella type-I the least. No significant differences were found regarding tympanic membrane perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective chart review showed that no tube was clinically superior across all complications. The findings from this study may give otolaryngologists an opportunity to consider choosing a specific type of tube according to the clinical situation. The large variations in extrusion times should be considered in terms of patient age, seasonality, and desired duration of tube placement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

目的

评估首次接受四种常用短期通气管之一的儿童在耳漏、鼓膜穿孔及通气管排出时间方面的差异。

方法

对术后2年的随访记录进行回顾性图表分析,以分析插入Paparella I型Activent通气管、阿姆斯特朗斜面通气管、改良阿姆斯特朗通气管或阿姆斯特朗微凝胶通气管后的患者结局。通过查阅医疗记录确定并发症的发生率。采用校正多变量逻辑回归模型确定四种通气管类型并发症的比值比。

结果

共纳入387例患者。平均年龄为2.4岁,女性占35.9%。阿姆斯特朗斜面通气管发生耳漏的几率最高。Paparella I型通气管的排出时间最短,约为9个月,而阿姆斯特朗斜面通气管最长,近19个月。在评估每个儿童平均每月经历的耳漏发作次数时,阿姆斯特朗斜面通气管的耳漏月发生率最高,Paparella I型最低。鼓膜穿孔方面未发现显著差异。

结论

这项回顾性图表分析表明,在所有并发症方面,没有一种通气管在临床上具有绝对优势。本研究结果可能为耳鼻喉科医生根据临床情况选择特定类型的通气管提供参考。在考虑患者年龄、季节因素及通气管放置的预期时长时,应注意通气管排出时间的较大差异。

证据级别

4级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c779/11283280/7ccb4cbe3bc3/LIO2-9-e1306-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验