• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨国合作中的机遇与挑战:比荷卢经济联盟倡议的见解

Opportunities and Challenges in Cross-Country Collaboration: Insights from the Beneluxa Initiative.

作者信息

Claessens Zilke, Lammens Michiel, Barbier Liese, Huys Isabelle

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Jul 9;12(3):144-157. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12030012. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.3390/jmahp12030012
PMID:39072305
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11270242/
Abstract

National pricing and reimbursement agencies face growing challenges with complex health technologies, prompting European policy advancements. Beneluxa is a cross-country collaboration involving Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg, Austria, and Ireland that aims to address sustainable access to medicines. In view of the soon-to-be-implemented EU HTA Regulation, insights and experiences from stakeholders with Beneluxa cross-country collaboration could provide possible transferable learnings. Therefore, this research aims to (i) identify the opportunities and challenges faced by Beneluxa, (ii) gather insights from stakeholders, namely (possible) applicants and policymakers, within and beyond Beneluxa on the initiative and broader cross-country collaboration principles, and (iii) transfer these insights into learnings and recommendations in anticipation of the full implementation of the new HTA Regulation. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with industry and European HTA/policy stakeholders. The principal challenges discussed by stakeholders encompass hesitancy from the industry toward Beneluxa assessments, which were attributed to procedural and timeline uncertainties, legislative framework ambiguity, and challenges in terms of industry's internal organization. Another challenge highlighted is the resource-intensive nature of the procedure due to diverse approaches among member states. In addition, industry stakeholders mentioned limited communication and procedural complexity. Despite challenges, both stakeholder groups recognized important opportunities for cross-country collaboration. Transferable insights for future cross-country collaboration include transparent communication, clear legislative embedding, internal industry restructuring to facilitate joint HTAs, and member state support for conducting collaborative assessments. The study underscores diverging views among stakeholders on cross-country collaboration's potential to support HTA and the market access of complex health technologies. While acknowledging benefits, there still are challenges, including industry hesitancy, emphasizing the need for transparent communication and clear guidance in the evolving EU HTA landscape.

摘要

国家定价和报销机构在面对复杂的医疗技术时面临着越来越多的挑战,这促使欧洲出台政策改进措施。比荷卢联盟是一项涉及比利时、荷兰、卢森堡、奥地利和爱尔兰的跨国合作,旨在解决药品的可持续可及性问题。鉴于即将实施的欧盟卫生技术评估法规,比荷卢联盟跨国合作中利益相关者的见解和经验可能会提供可借鉴的经验。因此,本研究旨在:(i)确定比荷卢联盟面临的机遇和挑战;(ii)收集利益相关者的见解,即比荷卢联盟内外的(潜在)申请者和政策制定者对比荷卢联盟倡议及更广泛的跨国合作原则的见解;(iii)在新的卫生技术评估法规全面实施之前,将这些见解转化为经验教训和建议。对行业和欧洲卫生技术评估/政策利益相关者进行了15次半结构化访谈。利益相关者讨论的主要挑战包括行业对比荷卢联盟评估的犹豫,这归因于程序和时间线的不确定性、立法框架的模糊性以及行业内部组织方面的挑战。另一个突出的挑战是由于成员国之间的不同方法,该程序资源密集。此外,行业利益相关者提到沟通有限和程序复杂。尽管存在挑战,但两个利益相关者群体都认识到跨国合作的重要机遇。未来跨国合作的可借鉴见解包括透明沟通、明确的立法嵌入、促进联合卫生技术评估的行业内部重组以及成员国对进行合作评估的支持。该研究强调了利益相关者对跨国合作支持卫生技术评估和复杂医疗技术市场准入潜力的不同看法。虽然承认有好处,但仍然存在挑战,包括行业犹豫,这强调了在不断发展的欧盟卫生技术评估环境中进行透明沟通和明确指导的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de86/11270242/a7576def0b2b/jmahp-12-00012-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de86/11270242/3506e92e479d/jmahp-12-00012-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de86/11270242/f2767eefe2cb/jmahp-12-00012-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de86/11270242/a7576def0b2b/jmahp-12-00012-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de86/11270242/3506e92e479d/jmahp-12-00012-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de86/11270242/f2767eefe2cb/jmahp-12-00012-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de86/11270242/a7576def0b2b/jmahp-12-00012-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Opportunities and Challenges in Cross-Country Collaboration: Insights from the Beneluxa Initiative.跨国合作中的机遇与挑战:比荷卢经济联盟倡议的见解
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Jul 9;12(3):144-157. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12030012. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
The Beneluxa Initiative domain task force health technology assessment: a comparison of member countries' past health technology assessments.比荷卢经济联盟倡议领域工作组卫生技术评估:成员国过去卫生技术评估的比较。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Jun 15;39(1):e44. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000338.
3
"Ready for the future?" - Status of national and cross-country horizon scanning systems for medicines in European countries.“为未来做好准备了吗?”- 欧洲国家药品国家和跨国领域扫描系统的现状。
Ger Med Sci. 2022 Mar 31;20:Doc05. doi: 10.3205/000307. eCollection 2022.
4
Implementing the EU HTA regulation: Insights from semi-structured interviews on patient expectations, Belgian and European institutional perspectives, and industry outlooks.实施欧盟卫生技术评估法规:关于患者期望、比利时和欧洲机构观点以及行业展望的半结构化访谈见解
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 10;15:1369508. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1369508. eCollection 2024.
5
Value added medicines: what value repurposed medicines might bring to society?增值药物:重新利用的药物可能给社会带来什么价值?
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2016 Dec 23;5(1):1264717. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2017.1264717. eCollection 2017.
6
[European Collaboration in Medical Device Assessment: One Step Towards Cross-Border Health Care].[欧洲医疗器械评估合作:迈向跨境医疗保健的一步]
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Mar;80(3):210-216. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-109859. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
7
Exploring the landscape of health technology assessment in Iran: perspectives from stakeholders on needs, demand and supply.探索伊朗卫生技术评估的全貌:利益相关者对需求、需求和供应的看法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jan 15;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01097-0.
8
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.医疗设备的卫生技术评估:有何不同?三个欧洲项目概述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
9
Stakeholder perspectives on cooperation in the clinical and nonclinical health technology assessment domains.利益相关者对临床和非临床卫生技术评估领域合作的看法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 May 22;39(1):e29. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000077.
10
[Policy developments of health technology assessment in the European Union].[欧盟卫生技术评估的政策发展]
Postepy Biochem. 2019 Nov 29;65(4):319-321. doi: 10.18388/pb.2019_285.

引用本文的文献

1
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Bibliometric Review.重复经颅磁刺激在中风康复中的应用:文献计量学综述
Cureus. 2025 Feb 23;17(2):e79509. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79509. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Avoiding Error and Finding the Right Balance in European Health Technology Assessments: Insights Generated by the European Access Academy.在欧洲卫生技术评估中避免错误并找到正确平衡:欧洲准入学院产生的见解
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 Feb 10;13(1):6. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13010006. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing the EU HTA regulation: Insights from semi-structured interviews on patient expectations, Belgian and European institutional perspectives, and industry outlooks.实施欧盟卫生技术评估法规:关于患者期望、比利时和欧洲机构观点以及行业展望的半结构化访谈见解
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 10;15:1369508. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1369508. eCollection 2024.
2
The Beneluxa Initiative domain task force health technology assessment: a comparison of member countries' past health technology assessments.比荷卢经济联盟倡议领域工作组卫生技术评估:成员国过去卫生技术评估的比较。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Jun 15;39(1):e44. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000338.
3
Affordable Prices Without Threatening the Oncological R&D Pipeline-An Economic Experiment on Transparency in Price Negotiations.
平价而不危及肿瘤研发管线——价格谈判透明度的经济试验。
Cancer Res Commun. 2022 Jan 27;2(1):49-57. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-21-0031. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
How can a joint European health technology assessment provide an 'additional benefit' over the current standard of national assessments? : Insights generated from a multi-stakeholder survey in hematology/oncology.相较于当前各国的评估标准,欧洲联合卫生技术评估如何能带来“额外益处”?:血液学/肿瘤学多利益相关方调查得出的见解
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Jun 2;12(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00379-7.
5
"Ready for the future?" - Status of national and cross-country horizon scanning systems for medicines in European countries.“为未来做好准备了吗?”- 欧洲国家药品国家和跨国领域扫描系统的现状。
Ger Med Sci. 2022 Mar 31;20:Doc05. doi: 10.3205/000307. eCollection 2022.
6
European union regulation of health technology assessment: what is required for it to succeed?欧盟对卫生技术评估的监管:其成功需要具备哪些条件?
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Aug;23(6):913-915. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01458-6. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
7
Pricing Zolgensma - the world's most expensive drug.诺西那生钠注射液定价——全球最昂贵的药物。 (注:Zolgensma是治疗脊髓性肌萎缩症的药物,中文名为诺西那生钠注射液,但原英文文本未明确指出,按照要求直接翻译。)
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2021 Dec 29;10(1):2022353. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2021.2022353. eCollection 2022.
8
A Review of the Evidence on Attitudes, Perceived Impacts and Motivational Factors for European Member State Collaboration for Pricing and Reimbursement of Medicines: Time for the EEA Member States to Apply Their Experience and Expertise in Evidence-Based Decision Making to Their Current Pharmaceutical Policy Challenges.欧洲成员国药品定价与报销合作的态度、感知影响及动机因素的证据综述:欧洲经济区成员国是时候将其在循证决策方面的经验和专业知识应用于当前的药品政策挑战了。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 12;12:666405. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.666405. eCollection 2021.
9
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
10
European collaborations on medicine and vaccine procurement.欧洲在医学和疫苗采购方面的合作。
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Oct 1;99(10):715-721. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.285761. Epub 2021 Aug 20.