Suppr超能文献

治疗高危和晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)的方法:影响临床治疗决策的关键试验数据

Approaches to Treating High Risk and Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC): Key Trial Data That Impacts Treatment Decisions in the Clinic.

作者信息

Chatzkel Jonathan, Fishman Mayer, Ramnaraign Brian, O'Malley Padraic, Sonpavde Guru P

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

Res Rep Urol. 2024 Jul 22;16:161-176. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S457287. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The treatment paradigm for high risk localized and advanced kidney cancer has been characterized by ongoing changes, with the introduction of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs) and later with immune checkpoint blockade. In this article, we review how current evidence informs our decision-making on post-checkpoint inhibitor systemic therapies, the role of adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant therapies, and the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the evolving systemic therapy landscape. While some studies support a post-checkpoint inhibitor benefit from the VEGFR TKIs cabozantinib or axitinib, the benefit of doublet therapies including a VEGF receptor inhibitor and a checkpoint inhibitor remains an area of active investigation, with the combination of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showing promise but with a Phase III trial of the combination of atezolizumab plus cabozantinib showing no benefit over cabozantinib alone. The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk disease who have undergone cytoreductive nephrectomy and potentially metastasectomy is also an area of continuing interest. While the S-TRAC study demonstrated a disease-free survival benefit for adjuvant sunitinib, no overall survival benefit was shown, and multiple other studies of adjuvant VEGFR TKI therapy have been negative. Subsequently, adjuvant pembrolizumab has shown a benefit in overall survival, whereas trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant nivolumab, adjuvant atezolizumab, and adjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab have all been negative. Finally, the role for cytoreductive nephrectomy continues to be an area of active debate. The CARMENA study raised important questions about the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy given the advances in VEGFR TKI therapy but was characterized by accrual difficulties and a significant number of patients not receiving treatment according to the study protocol. Two ongoing studies (NORDIC-SUN and PROBE) seek to further address the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the doublet therapy era.

摘要

高危局限性和晚期肾癌的治疗模式一直在不断变化,先是引入了血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(VEGFR TKIs),后来又有了免疫检查点阻断疗法。在本文中,我们回顾了当前证据如何为我们在检查点抑制剂后全身治疗、辅助和/或新辅助治疗的作用以及减瘤性肾切除术在不断演变的全身治疗格局中的作用方面的决策提供信息。虽然一些研究支持在检查点抑制剂后使用VEGFR TKIs卡博替尼或阿昔替尼有益,但包括VEGF受体抑制剂和检查点抑制剂的双联疗法的益处仍是一个积极研究的领域,乐伐替尼联合派姆单抗的联合疗法显示出前景,但阿特珠单抗联合卡博替尼的III期试验显示,与单独使用卡博替尼相比并无益处。辅助治疗在接受了减瘤性肾切除术并可能进行了转移灶切除术的高危疾病患者中的作用也是一个持续受到关注的领域。虽然S-TRAC研究显示辅助使用舒尼替尼可带来无病生存获益,但未显示总生存获益,并且其他多项辅助VEGFR TKI治疗的研究均为阴性。随后,辅助使用派姆单抗显示出总生存获益,而新辅助和辅助使用纳武单抗、辅助使用阿特珠单抗以及辅助使用伊匹木单抗联合纳武单抗的试验均为阴性。最后,减瘤性肾切除术的作用仍然是一个激烈争论的领域。鉴于VEGFR TKI治疗的进展,CARMENA研究对减瘤性肾切除术的作用提出了重要问题,但该研究存在入组困难,且有大量患者未按照研究方案接受治疗。两项正在进行的研究(北欧-阳光研究和PROBE研究)试图进一步探讨减瘤性肾切除术在双联疗法时代的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb4b/11282163/eefea974ea42/RRU-16-161-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验