1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Kalavakkam, Chennai - 603110, India.
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2024 Mar 20;25(4):133-143. doi: 10.37190/abb-02380-2024-04. Print 2023 Dec 1.
: Finite element analysis is frequently used for lumbar spine biomechanical analysis. The primary scope of this work is to illustrate, using finite element analysis, how the biomechanical behavior of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), along with a novel combination of the interspinous process device (IPD) and pedicle screws, improves lumbar spine stability. : In this study, unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) and bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) were used. Four FE models were developed using ANSYS software, as follows: (1) Intact model; (2) TLIF with "U"-shaped Coflex-F IPD (UCF); (3) TLIF with Coflex-F and UPSF (UCF + UPSF); (4) TLIF with Coflex-F and BPSF (UCF + BPSF). The intact model was subjected to four pure moments (10 Nm), and the results were validated with previous literature data. The intact model results correlated well with the literature data, and the model was validated. Three surgical models were subjected to 7.5 Nm four pure moments, flexion (FL), extension (ET), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) and a 280N follower load. : The surgical model results were compared with the intact model. The comprehensive analysis results show the UCF + BPSF surgical model gave a good advantage on range of motion, cage stress, Coflex-F stress and endplate stress compared among the two models. : This study proposes that the UCF + BPSF system helps to reduce the stress on the implant and adjacent endplates and gives very good stability to the lumbar spine under the various static loading conditions.
有限元分析常用于腰椎生物力学分析。这项工作的主要目的是通过有限元分析来说明,经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(TLIF)与棘突间装置(IPD)和椎弓根螺钉的新型组合如何改善腰椎稳定性。
在这项研究中,使用了单侧椎弓根螺钉固定(UPSF)和双侧椎弓根螺钉固定(BPSF)。使用 ANSYS 软件开发了四个有限元模型,如下所示:(1)完整模型;(2)TLIF 结合“U”形 Coflex-F IPD(UCF);(3)TLIF 结合 Coflex-F 和 UPSF(UCF+UPSF);(4)TLIF 结合 Coflex-F 和 BPSF(UCF+BPSF)。完整模型受到四个纯力矩(10 Nm)的作用,结果与先前的文献数据进行了验证。完整模型的结果与文献数据相关性良好,模型得到了验证。三个手术模型受到 7.5 Nm 四个纯力矩、前屈(FL)、伸展(ET)、侧屈(LB)和轴向旋转(AR)以及 280N 跟随力的作用。
将手术模型的结果与完整模型进行比较。综合分析结果表明,与两种模型相比,UCF+BPSF 手术模型在运动范围、笼状结构应力、Coflex-F 应力和终板应力方面具有更好的优势。
本研究表明,UCF+BPSF 系统有助于减轻植入物和相邻终板的应力,并在各种静态加载条件下为腰椎提供非常好的稳定性。