Suppr超能文献

验证生物电阻抗设备在消防员体脂百分比测定中的应用。

Validation of Bioelectrical Impedance Devices for the Determination of Body Fat Percentage in Firefighters.

机构信息

Sports Medicine Department, Mayo Clinic Health System, Onalaska, Wisconsin.

Exercise and Sport Science Department, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Aug 1;38(8):e448-e453. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004809.

Abstract

Jagim, AR, Luedke, J, Erickson, JL, Fields, JB, and Jones, MT. Validation of bioelectrical impedance devices for the determination of body fat percentage in firefighters. J Strength Cond Res 38(8): e448-e453, 2024-To cross-validate bioelectrical impedance devices for the determination of body fat percentage (BF%) in firefighters. Twenty-eight structural firefighters were evaluated (female, n = 2; male, n = 26 [mean ± SD] age: 38.2 ± 8.3 years; height: 180.2 ± 7.5 cm; body mass: 86.7 ± 20.8 kg; body mass index: 25.8 ± 7.8 kg·m-2) using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA) hand-to-foot device, and single-frequency BIA foot scale (F2FBIA), and a single-frequency handheld BIA device (HHBIA). Dual X-ray absorptiometry served as the criterion. Validity metrics were examined to establish each method's performance. Body fat % values produced by MFBIA (r = 0.913), F2FBIA (r = 0.695), and HHBIA (r = 0.876) were strongly associated (p < 0.001) with criterion BF% measures. However, MFBIA, F2FBIA, and HHBIA all significantly (p < 0.001) underestimated BF% when compared with the criterion measure. Constant error ranged between 4.0 and 5.5% across all BIA devices. Despite strong associations between the BIA devices included in the current study and the criterion measure, all BIA devices underestimated BF%, which resulted in an overestimation of fat-free mass. In addition, proportional bias was observed in which BF% was overestimated at lower values and underestimated at higher values.

摘要

贾吉姆、卢德克、埃里克森、菲尔兹和琼斯。生物电阻抗设备在消防员体脂百分比测定中的验证。J 力量与调理研究 38(8):e448-e453,2024-交叉验证生物电阻抗设备在消防员体脂百分比(BF%)测定中的应用。对 28 名结构消防员进行了评估(女性,n=2;男性,n=26[平均±SD]年龄:38.2±8.3 岁;身高:180.2±7.5 厘米;体重:86.7±20.8 千克;体重指数:25.8±7.8 千克·米-2)使用多频生物电阻抗分析(MFBIA)手到脚设备和单频 BIA 足秤(F2FBIA),以及单频手持 BIA 设备(HHBIA)。双 X 射线吸收法作为标准。有效性指标被检查以确定每种方法的性能。MFBIA(r=0.913)、F2FBIA(r=0.695)和 HHBIA(r=0.876)产生的体脂%值与标准 BF%测量值密切相关(p<0.001)。然而,与标准测量值相比,MFBIA、F2FBIA 和 HHBIA 均显著(p<0.001)低估了 BF%。所有 BIA 设备的恒误差在 4.0%至 5.5%之间。尽管当前研究中包含的 BIA 设备与标准测量值之间存在很强的关联,但所有 BIA 设备均低估了 BF%,从而高估了去脂体重。此外,还观察到比例偏差,即 BF%在较低值时高估,在较高值时低估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验