Suppr超能文献

一种新的监管焦点衡量方法:通过推广最佳验证实践来防止测量误差。

A new measure of regulatory focus: Preventing measurement error by promoting best validation practices.

作者信息

Fuglestad Paul T, Volz Sarah, Joyal-Desmarais Keven, Nydick Steven W, DeYoung Colin G, Rothman Alexander J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Pers. 2025 Jun;93(3):683-705. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12962. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND

The goals of this project were to improve our understanding of chronic regulatory focus constructs and to provide researchers with a measure that adequately assesses the constructs, can distinguish individual differences effectively across the range of the constructs, and is appropriate for use in diverse populations.

METHOD

Employing best practices in construct validation, we developed the International Personality Item Pool Regulatory Focus Scale (IPIP-RFS). Utilizing 14 samples (N = 4867), we established substantive (via expert ratings and regulatory focus literature), structural (via factor analysis, item response theory, and measurement invariance), and external (via convergent, discriminant, and predictive associations) validity.

RESULTS

The IPIP-RFS adequately assesses the constructs of chronic promotion focus and prevention focus, can accurately assess individuals along the continua of the constructs, and is suitable for use among populations that vary in gender, race, and age. Individual differences in promotion focus reflect self-regulation and goal pursuit related to cognitive and behavioral exploration and flexibility (i.e., plasticity), whereas individual differences in prevention focus reflect self-regulation and goal pursuit related to motivational and interpersonal steadiness (i.e., stability).

CONCLUSIONS

Promotion and prevention focus are important elements of personality with broad implications for functioning and outcomes in health and other important domains.

摘要

目的与背景

本项目的目标是增进我们对慢性调节焦点结构的理解,并为研究人员提供一种能够充分评估这些结构、有效区分结构范围内个体差异且适用于不同人群的测量方法。

方法

我们采用结构效度验证的最佳实践,开发了国际个性项目池调节焦点量表(IPIP-RFS)。利用14个样本(N = 4867),我们建立了实质效度(通过专家评级和调节焦点文献)、结构效度(通过因素分析、项目反应理论和测量不变性)以及外部效度(通过聚合效度、区分效度和预测关联)。

结果

IPIP-RFS能够充分评估慢性促进焦点和预防焦点的结构,能够沿着这些结构的连续体准确评估个体,并且适用于性别、种族和年龄各异的人群。促进焦点的个体差异反映了与认知和行为探索及灵活性(即可塑性)相关的自我调节和目标追求,而预防焦点的个体差异反映了与动机和人际稳定性(即稳定性)相关的自我调节和目标追求。

结论

促进焦点和预防焦点是个性的重要元素,对健康及其他重要领域的功能和结果具有广泛影响。

相似文献

1
A new measure of regulatory focus: Preventing measurement error by promoting best validation practices.
J Pers. 2025 Jun;93(3):683-705. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12962. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
4
Gain +1 or Avoid -1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ).
BMC Psychol. 2017 Dec 19;5(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40359-017-0207-y.
5
The Development and Validation of the Rational and Intuitive Decision Styles Scale.
J Pers Assess. 2016 Sep-Oct;98(5):523-35. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1132426. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
6
Do personality scale items function differently in people with high and low IQ?
Psychol Assess. 2012 Sep;24(3):545-55. doi: 10.1037/a0026266. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
8
A Validation Study of the Mini-IPIP Five-Factor Personality Scale in Adults With Cancer.
J Pers Assess. 2020 Mar-Apr;102(2):153-163. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1644341. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
9
Drive: Theory and Construct Validation.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0157295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157295. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

2
Applying Regulatory Focus Theory to Encourage Weight Loss in a Self-directed Intervention.
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Apr;31(2):331-337. doi: 10.1007/s12529-023-10180-3. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
4
Motivations for Sexual Behavior and Intentions to Use Condoms: Development of the Regulatory Focus in Sexuality Scale.
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Feb;48(2):557-575. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1316-2. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
5
Developing a scale to assess health regulatory focus.
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Dec;195:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.029. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
6
Program for lung cancer screening and tobacco cessation: Study protocol of a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Sep;60:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
7
Standardized Effect Sizes for Moderated Conditional Fixed Effects with Continuous Moderator Variables.
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 21;8:562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00562. eCollection 2017.
9
Time perspective and volunteerism: The importance of focusing on the future.
J Soc Psychol. 2016;156(3):334-49. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2015.1090946.
10
Regulatory Focus, Proximity to Goal Weight, and Weight Loss Maintenance.
Am J Health Behav. 2015 Sep;39(5):709-20. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.39.5.12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验