Suppr超能文献

一种新的监管焦点衡量方法:通过推广最佳验证实践来防止测量误差。

A new measure of regulatory focus: Preventing measurement error by promoting best validation practices.

作者信息

Fuglestad Paul T, Volz Sarah, Joyal-Desmarais Keven, Nydick Steven W, DeYoung Colin G, Rothman Alexander J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Pers. 2025 Jun;93(3):683-705. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12962. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND

The goals of this project were to improve our understanding of chronic regulatory focus constructs and to provide researchers with a measure that adequately assesses the constructs, can distinguish individual differences effectively across the range of the constructs, and is appropriate for use in diverse populations.

METHOD

Employing best practices in construct validation, we developed the International Personality Item Pool Regulatory Focus Scale (IPIP-RFS). Utilizing 14 samples (N = 4867), we established substantive (via expert ratings and regulatory focus literature), structural (via factor analysis, item response theory, and measurement invariance), and external (via convergent, discriminant, and predictive associations) validity.

RESULTS

The IPIP-RFS adequately assesses the constructs of chronic promotion focus and prevention focus, can accurately assess individuals along the continua of the constructs, and is suitable for use among populations that vary in gender, race, and age. Individual differences in promotion focus reflect self-regulation and goal pursuit related to cognitive and behavioral exploration and flexibility (i.e., plasticity), whereas individual differences in prevention focus reflect self-regulation and goal pursuit related to motivational and interpersonal steadiness (i.e., stability).

CONCLUSIONS

Promotion and prevention focus are important elements of personality with broad implications for functioning and outcomes in health and other important domains.

摘要

目的与背景

本项目的目标是增进我们对慢性调节焦点结构的理解,并为研究人员提供一种能够充分评估这些结构、有效区分结构范围内个体差异且适用于不同人群的测量方法。

方法

我们采用结构效度验证的最佳实践,开发了国际个性项目池调节焦点量表(IPIP-RFS)。利用14个样本(N = 4867),我们建立了实质效度(通过专家评级和调节焦点文献)、结构效度(通过因素分析、项目反应理论和测量不变性)以及外部效度(通过聚合效度、区分效度和预测关联)。

结果

IPIP-RFS能够充分评估慢性促进焦点和预防焦点的结构,能够沿着这些结构的连续体准确评估个体,并且适用于性别、种族和年龄各异的人群。促进焦点的个体差异反映了与认知和行为探索及灵活性(即可塑性)相关的自我调节和目标追求,而预防焦点的个体差异反映了与动机和人际稳定性(即稳定性)相关的自我调节和目标追求。

结论

促进焦点和预防焦点是个性的重要元素,对健康及其他重要领域的功能和结果具有广泛影响。

相似文献

5
The Development and Validation of the Rational and Intuitive Decision Styles Scale.理性与直觉决策风格量表的编制与验证
J Pers Assess. 2016 Sep-Oct;98(5):523-35. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1132426. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
9
Drive: Theory and Construct Validation.驱力:理论与结构效度验证
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0157295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157295. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

5
Developing a scale to assess health regulatory focus.制定一个评估健康监管焦点的量表。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Dec;195:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.029. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验