• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可流动的短纤维增强树脂能否与生物陶瓷实现牢固的粘结?

Can flowable short-fiber-reinforced resins achieve a strong adhesion to bioceramics?

作者信息

Topbaş Celalettin, Kul Abdurrahman Kerim

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Microsc Res Tech. 2024 Dec;87(12):2964-2973. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24668. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1002/jemt.24668
PMID:39072834
Abstract

This study compared the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of four calcium silicate-based cements (CSCs), TheraCal PT (TPT), TheraCal LC (TLC), Biodentine (BD), and Dia-Root Bio MTA (DR), with a short fiber-reinforced composite resin (SFRC). Forty cylindrical acrylic blocks were used, each with a center hole (diameter 5 mm, depth 2 mm). CSCs were placed in the holes (n = 10/group), and the blocks were incubated for 48 h. G-Premio BOND, a self-etching adhesive, was applied to the CSCs surfaces using a micro-applicator for 10 s and then air-dried for 5 s, followed by light curing for 20 s. SFRC materials placed in cylindrical polyethylene capsules (diameter 2 mm, height 2 mm) were polymerized for 20 s and placed over the CSCs. The samples were then incubated at 37°C and 100% humidity for 24 h, and their μSBSs were tested using an "Instron Universal Testing Machine." Data were statistically analyzed using chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Statistically significant differences were observed between the tested CSCs. The μSBS of TPT (45.17 ± 4.56 MPa) was significantly higher (p < .05) than that of the other materials: BD, TLC, and DR had μSBSs of 29.18 ± 2.86 MPa (p < .05), 23.86 ± 2.84 MPa (p > .05), and 18.08 ± 2.69 MPa (p < .05), respectively. Considering the importance of bond strength for CSC sealing with restorative material, using SFRC over CSC was promising for improving the μSBS, adhesion, and sealing of the material. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Adhesion is critical to the success of vital pulp restorations. To achieve strong adhesion, the bioceramic material and the resin composite to which it is bonded are very important. In our study, short fiber-reinforced composite resin, which is gaining popularity, was used and found to be a promising material for improved adhesion.

摘要

本研究比较了四种硅酸钙基水门汀(CSCs),即TheraCal PT(TPT)、TheraCal LC(TLC)、Biodentine(BD)和Dia-Root Bio MTA(DR)与短纤维增强复合树脂(SFRC)的微剪切粘结强度(μSBS)。使用了40个圆柱形丙烯酸树脂块,每个都有一个中心孔(直径5毫米,深度2毫米)。将CSCs放入孔中(每组n = 10),并将这些块孵育48小时。使用微型涂抹器将自酸蚀粘结剂G-Premio BOND涂抹在CSCs表面10秒,然后风干5秒,接着光固化20秒。将置于圆柱形聚乙烯胶囊(直径2毫米,高度2毫米)中的SFRC材料聚合20秒,并放置在CSCs上方。然后将样品在37°C和100%湿度下孵育24小时,并使用“英斯特朗万能材料试验机”测试其μSBS。数据使用卡方检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验进行统计学分析。在测试的CSCs之间观察到了统计学上的显著差异。TPT的μSBS(45.17±4.56兆帕)显著高于(p <.05)其他材料:BD、TLC和DR的μSBS分别为29.18±2.86兆帕(p <.05)、23.86±2.84兆帕(p>.05)和18.08±2.69兆帕(p <.05)。考虑到粘结强度对于用修复材料密封CSC的重要性,在CSC上使用SFRC有望改善材料的μSBS、粘结性和密封性。研究亮点:粘结对于活髓修复的成功至关重要。为实现强粘结,生物陶瓷材料及其粘结的树脂复合材料非常重要。在我们的研究中,使用了越来越受欢迎的短纤维增强复合树脂,发现它是一种有望改善粘结的材料。

相似文献

1
Can flowable short-fiber-reinforced resins achieve a strong adhesion to bioceramics?可流动的短纤维增强树脂能否与生物陶瓷实现牢固的粘结?
Microsc Res Tech. 2024 Dec;87(12):2964-2973. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24668. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
Micro-shear bond strength of different calcium silicate materials to bulk-fill composite.不同硅酸钙材料与块状充填复合树脂的微剪切粘结强度。
PeerJ. 2023 Mar 29;11:e15183. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15183. eCollection 2023.
3
Microshear Bond Strength of Tri-Calcium Silicate-based Cements to Different Restorative Materials.硅酸三钙基水门汀与不同修复材料的微剪切粘结强度
J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(3):231-7. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35934.
4
The micro-shear bond strength of new endodontic tricalcium silicate-based putty: An in vitro study.新型根管治疗用硅酸三钙基糊剂的微剪切粘结强度:一项体外研究。
Aust Endod J. 2023 Apr;49(1):124-129. doi: 10.1111/aej.12631. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
5
In vitro comparison of shear bond strength of a flowable composite resin and a single-component glass-ionomer to three different pulp-capping agents.可流动复合树脂和单组分玻璃离子与三种不同盖髓剂的剪切粘结强度的体外比较。
Dent Med Probl. 2019 Jul-Sep;56(3):239-244. doi: 10.17219/dmp/109233.
6
Comparative evaluations of shear bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and calcium-enriched mixture to bulk-fill flowable composite using three different adhesive systems: An study.使用三种不同粘结系统对三氧化矿物凝聚体、生物陶瓷和富钙混合物与大块可流动复合树脂之间的剪切粘结强度进行的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jul;27(7):706-713. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_192_24. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
7
Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Immediate and Delayed Restorations of Various Calcium Silicate-Based Materials with Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resin Materials.不同硅酸钙基材料与纤维增强复合树脂材料即时和延迟修复体的剪切粘结强度评估
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Oct 2;15(19):3971. doi: 10.3390/polym15193971.
8
Bond strength of different restorative materials to light-curable mineral trioxide aggregate.不同修复材料与光固化三氧化矿物凝聚体的粘结强度
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Winter;39(2):143-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.39.2.84x57tp110k46183.
9
Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems.使用不同粘结系统时新型光固化硅酸钙基水门汀与树脂复合材料的剪切粘结强度
Dent Mater J. 2016 Dec 1;35(6):881-887. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-075. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
10
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Tricalcium Silicate-based Materials to Composite Resin with Two Different Adhesive Systems: An Study.基于硅酸三钙的材料与两种不同粘结系统的复合树脂之间剪切粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov;16(Suppl 3):272-277. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2687.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Materials for Direct Pulp Capping: An Study in Mice.三种硅酸钙基材料用于直接盖髓的比较评价:一项在小鼠中的研究。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 30:2025.05.29.656939. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.29.656939.