• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于硅酸三钙的材料与两种不同粘结系统的复合树脂之间剪切粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。

Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Tricalcium Silicate-based Materials to Composite Resin with Two Different Adhesive Systems: An Study.

作者信息

Kumar Vikrant, Showkat Insha, Manuja Naveen, Chaudhary Seema, Sinha Ashish A, Telgi Chaitra R

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Kothiwal Dental College & Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov;16(Suppl 3):272-277. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2687.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2687
PMID:38268635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10804296/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Establishing a strong bond between the pulp capping agent and the restorative material is crucial to the success of the procedure. Without this bond, there is a risk of bacterial infiltration into the pulp, leading to treatment failure. In the past, calcium hydroxide was commonly used for such treatments, but it faced challenges, including poor adhesion to dentin, dissolution over time, and the development of multiple tunnel defects. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), introduced to dentistry in 1993, offered an alternative but came with drawbacks like challenging handling and extended setting times. However, in recent times, several new calcium silicate-based materials have emerged to address MTA's limitations. Two notable examples are Biodentine and MTA Plus. Biodentine, for instance, exhibits excellent sealing ability, while MTA Plus distinguishes itself with a finer particle size compared to traditional MTA. These innovative materials offer promising solutions to enhance the efficacy of pulp capping procedures.

AIM

Therefore, in this research, we conducted a comparative analysis of the shear bond strength (SBS) between composite resin and three materials-MTA, MTA Plus, and Biodentine. We examined the effects of applying two distinct adhesive systems in order to evaluate their influence on the bond strength.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 acrylic blocks were evenly distributed into three groups, each containing 20 blocks-group I received Biodentine, group II was assigned MTA, and group III received MTA Plus. The respective test materials were compacted into the holes within the blocks. Following this, the samples were incubated for a period of 72 hours. Subsequently, the samples were divided into two subgroups, each consisting of 10 blocks-the self-etch and the total-etch subgroup. The SBS values were then carefully measured for analysis.

RESULT

The SBS of the Biodentine group demonstrated a significantly higher value when compared to the other groups. It's worth noting that when the self-etch adhesive system was employed, the SBS of all the groups experienced a significant reduction.

CONCLUSION

Biodentine cement proves to be an effective choice for pulp capping procedures, regardless of the specific adhesive system employed. Notably, the total-etch adhesive system consistently yields higher bond strength when compared to the self-etch adhesive system.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Kumar V, Showkat I, Manuja N, Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Tricalcium Silicate-based Materials to Composite Resin with Two Different Adhesive Systems: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-3):S272-S277.

摘要

背景

使盖髓剂与修复材料之间建立牢固的结合对于该治疗程序的成功至关重要。没有这种结合,就有细菌侵入牙髓的风险,从而导致治疗失败。过去,氢氧化钙常用于此类治疗,但它面临诸多挑战,包括对牙本质的附着力差、随时间溶解以及出现多个隧道状缺损。1993年引入牙科领域的矿物三氧化物凝聚体(MTA)提供了一种替代方案,但也存在诸如操作难度大、凝固时间长等缺点。然而,近年来,出现了几种新型的硅酸钙基材料来解决MTA的局限性。两个显著的例子是百康特(Biodentine)和MTA Plus。例如,百康特表现出优异的封闭能力,而MTA Plus与传统MTA相比,其颗粒尺寸更细。这些创新材料为提高盖髓治疗程序的疗效提供了有前景的解决方案。

目的

因此,在本研究中,我们对复合树脂与三种材料——MTA、MTA Plus和百康特之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS)进行了对比分析。我们研究了应用两种不同粘结系统的效果,以评估它们对粘结强度的影响。

材料与方法

总共60个丙烯酸树脂块被均匀分为三组,每组20个块——第一组使用百康特,第二组使用MTA,第三组使用MTA Plus。将各自的测试材料压实到块内的孔中。在此之后,将样本孵育72小时。随后,将样本分为两个亚组,每个亚组由10个块组成——自酸蚀和全酸蚀亚组。然后仔细测量SBS值以进行分析。

结果

与其他组相比,百康特组的SBS值显著更高。值得注意的是,当采用自酸蚀粘结系统时,所有组的SBS均显著降低。

结论

无论采用何种具体的粘结系统,百康特水门汀被证明是盖髓治疗程序的有效选择。值得注意的是,与自酸蚀粘结系统相比,全酸蚀粘结系统始终能产生更高的粘结强度。

如何引用本文

Kumar V, Showkat I, Manuja N, 基于硅酸三钙的材料与复合树脂在两种不同粘结系统下的剪切粘结强度的比较评价:一项研究。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2023;16(S - 3):S272 - S277。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/10804296/ca0cccccacee/ijcpd-16-272-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/10804296/3eef4a277666/ijcpd-16-272-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/10804296/ca0cccccacee/ijcpd-16-272-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/10804296/3eef4a277666/ijcpd-16-272-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/10804296/ca0cccccacee/ijcpd-16-272-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Tricalcium Silicate-based Materials to Composite Resin with Two Different Adhesive Systems: An Study.基于硅酸三钙的材料与两种不同粘结系统的复合树脂之间剪切粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov;16(Suppl 3):272-277. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2687.
2
Comparative evaluations of shear bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and calcium-enriched mixture to bulk-fill flowable composite using three different adhesive systems: An study.使用三种不同粘结系统对三氧化矿物凝聚体、生物陶瓷和富钙混合物与大块可流动复合树脂之间的剪切粘结强度进行的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jul;27(7):706-713. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_192_24. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
Characterisation of the calcium silicate-based cement-composite interface and the bonding strength with total-etch or single/two-stage self-etch adhesive systems.硅酸钙基水泥复合材料界面的表征以及与全酸蚀或单/双阶段自酸蚀粘结系统的粘结强度
Aust Endod J. 2022 Dec;48(3):501-509. doi: 10.1111/aej.12600. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
4
Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®).两种树脂基复合材料和玻璃离子水门汀与纯硅酸三钙基水门汀(BioDentine®)的剪切粘结强度评估。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jul-Aug;22(4):302-6. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130660.
5
Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine.不同修复材料与三氧化矿物凝聚体和生物陶瓷的剪切粘结强度。
J Conserv Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct;20(5):292-296. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_97_17.
6
Shear bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements to composite resin using a universal adhesive in different application modes: an in vitro study.不同应用模式下通用黏合剂对钙硅基水泥与复合树脂间粘结强度的影响:一项体外研究。
Aust Dent J. 2024 Jun;69(2):102-111. doi: 10.1111/adj.12990. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
7
Bond strength of Biodentine to a resin-based composite at various acid etching times and with different adhesive strategies.在不同酸蚀时间及采用不同粘结策略的情况下,生物陶瓷与树脂基复合材料的粘结强度。
Dent Med Probl. 2019 Jan-Mar;56(1):39-44. doi: 10.17219/dmp/103589.
8
In vitro comparison of shear bond strength of a flowable composite resin and a single-component glass-ionomer to three different pulp-capping agents.可流动复合树脂和单组分玻璃离子与三种不同盖髓剂的剪切粘结强度的体外比较。
Dent Med Probl. 2019 Jul-Sep;56(3):239-244. doi: 10.17219/dmp/109233.
9
Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin.富钙混合水泥和三氧化矿物凝聚体与复合树脂的剪切粘结强度比较。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Nov 1;12(6):457-62. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1076.
10
Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems.使用不同粘结系统时新型光固化硅酸钙基水门汀与树脂复合材料的剪切粘结强度
Dent Mater J. 2016 Dec 1;35(6):881-887. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-075. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Bonding over Dentin Replacement Materials.牙本质替代材料的粘结。
J Endod. 2017 Aug;43(8):1343-1349. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.025. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
2
Effect of root canal irrigating solutions on the compressive strength of tricalcium silicate cements.根管冲洗液对硅酸三钙水门汀抗压强度的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Mar;21(2):567-571. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1922-0. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
3
"Evaluation of shear bond strength of a composite resin to white mineral trioxide aggregate with three different bonding systems"-An in vitro analysis.
“使用三种不同粘结系统评估复合树脂与白色三氧化矿物聚合体的剪切粘结强度”——一项体外分析。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Jul 1;8(3):e273-7. doi: 10.4317/jced.52727. eCollection 2016 Jul.
4
Evaluation of the bond strength of different adhesive agents to a resin-modified calcium silicate material (TheraCal LC).不同粘结剂与树脂改性硅酸钙材料(TheraCal LC)粘结强度的评估。
Scanning. 2016 Sep;38(5):403-411. doi: 10.1002/sca.21284. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
5
Shear Bond Strength of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite and a Flowable Base Composite to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement, and Biodentine.一种自粘结可流动复合树脂和一种可流动垫底复合树脂与三氧化矿物凝聚体、富钙混合水泥及生物陶瓷的剪切粘结强度
J Endod. 2015 Oct;41(10):1691-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
6
Ion release, porosity, solubility, and bioactivity of MTA Plus tricalcium silicate.MTA Plus硅酸三钙的离子释放、孔隙率、溶解度及生物活性
J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1632-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.025. Epub 2014 May 10.
7
X-ray diffraction analysis of MTA-Plus, MTA-Angelus and DiaRoot BioAggregate.MTA-Plus、MTA-Angelus和DiaRoot BioAggregate的X射线衍射分析。
Eur J Dent. 2014 Apr;8(2):211-215. doi: 10.4103/2278-344X.130603.
8
Shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to biodentine.不同粘结系统与生物活性牙本质的剪切粘结强度。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Oct 10;2013:626103. doi: 10.1155/2013/626103. eCollection 2013.
9
Comparison of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin to three pulp capping agents.树脂改性玻璃离子体和复合树脂与三种盖髓剂的剪切粘结强度比较。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7(3):164-8. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2013.026. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
10
Bond strength of composite resin to pulp capping biomaterials after application of three different bonding systems.应用三种不同粘结系统后复合树脂与牙髓盖髓生物材料的粘结强度
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7(3):152-6. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2013.024. Epub 2013 Aug 30.