Suppr超能文献

运用六西格玛方法确定特定直线加速器质量控制 (QC) 测试的极限。

Applying the six-sigma methodology to determine the limits of quality control (QC) tests for a specific linear accelerator.

机构信息

National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research, Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Sep;25(9):e14460. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14460. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to show the framework of the six-sigma methodology (SSM) that can be used to determine the limits of QC tests for the linear accelerator (Linac). Limits for QC tests are individually determined using the SSM.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The SSM is based on the define-measure-analyze-improve-control (DMAIC) stages to improve the process. In the "define" stage, the limits of QC tests were determined. In the "measure" stage, a retrospective collection of daily QC data using a Machine Performance Check platform was performed from January 2020 to December 2022. In the "analyze" stage, the process of determining the limits was proposed using statistical analyses and process capability indices. In the "improve" stage, the capability index was used to calculate the action limits. The tolerance limit was established using the larger one of the control limits in the individual control chart (I-chart). In the "control" stage, daily QC data were collected prospectively from January 2023 to May 2023 to monitor the effect of action limits and tolerance limits.

RESULTS

A total of 798 sets of QC data including beam, isocenter, collimation, couch, and gantry tests were collected and analyzed. The Collimation Rotation offset test had the min-Cp, min-Cpk, min-Pp, and min-Ppk at 2.53, 1.99, 1.59, and 1.25, respectively. The Couch Rtn test had the max-Cp, max-Cpk, max-Pp, and max-Ppk at 31.5, 29.9, 23.4, and 22.2, respectively. There are three QC tests with higher action limits than the original tolerance. Some data on the I-chart of the beam output change, isocenter KV offset, and jaw X1 exceeded the lower tolerance and action limit, which indicated that a system deviation occurred and reminded the physicist to take action to improve the process.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSM is an excellent framework to use in determining the limits of QC tests. The process capability index is an important parameter that provides quantitative information on determining the limits of QC tests.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在展示六西格玛方法(SSM)的框架,该方法可用于确定线性加速器(Linac)的 QC 测试限。使用 SSM 单独确定 QC 测试限。

方法和材料

SSM 基于定义-测量-分析-改进-控制(DMAIC)阶段来改进过程。在“定义”阶段,确定 QC 测试限。在“测量”阶段,使用机器性能检查平台对 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月的每日 QC 数据进行回顾性收集。在“分析”阶段,提出了使用统计分析和过程能力指数确定限制的过程。在“改进”阶段,使用能力指数计算行动限制。公差限使用个别控制图(I 图)中较大的控制限建立。在“控制”阶段,从 2023 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月前瞻性地收集每日 QC 数据,以监测行动限和公差限的效果。

结果

共收集和分析了 798 套包括光束、等中心、准直器、治疗床和龙门架测试的 QC 数据。准直器旋转偏移测试的最小-Cp、最小-Cpk、最小-Pp 和最小-Ppk 分别为 2.53、1.99、1.59 和 1.25。治疗床 Rtn 测试的最大-Cp、最大-Cpk、最大-Pp 和最大-Ppk 分别为 31.5、29.9、23.4 和 22.2。有三个 QC 测试的行动限高于原始公差。光束输出变化、等中心 KV 偏移和 jaw X1 的 I 图上的一些数据超过了较低的公差和行动限,这表明系统出现偏差,并提醒物理学家采取行动改进过程。

结论

SSM 是确定 QC 测试限的优秀框架。过程能力指数是确定 QC 测试限的重要参数,提供定量信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72c5/11492298/13f323911183/ACM2-25-e14460-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验