Austin Elizabeth J, Chen Jessica, Soyer Elena, Idrisov Bulat, Briggs Elsa S, Ferro Lori, Saxon Andrew J, Fortney John C, Curran Geoffrey M, Moghimi Yavar, Blanchard Brittany E, Williams Emily C, Ratzliff Anna D, Ruiz Monica S, Koch Ulrich
Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 351621, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Dec;39(16):3196-3204. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08963-9. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
Opioid use disorder (OUD) care engagement rates in primary care (PC) settings are often low. Little is known about PC team experiences when delivering OUD treatment and potential factors that influence their capacity to engage patients in treatment. Exploring PC team experiences may inform needed supports that can optimize OUD care delivery and improve outcomes for patients with OUD.
We explored multidisciplinary PC team perspectives on barriers and facilitators to engaging patients in OUD treatment.
Qualitative study using in-depth interviews.
Primary care clinical teams.
We conducted semi-structured interviews (n = 35) with PC team members involved in OUD care delivery, recruited using a combination of criterion and maximal variation sampling. Data collection and analysis were informed by existing theoretical literature about patient engagement, specifically that patient engagement is influenced by factors across individual (patient, provider), interpersonal (patient-provider), and health system domains. Interviews were professionally transcribed and doubled-coded using a coding schema based on the interview guide while allowing for emergent codes. Coding was iteratively reviewed using a constant comparison approach to identify themes and verified with participants and the full study team.
Analysis identified five themes that impact PC team ability to engage patients effectively, including limited patient contact (e.g., phone, text) in between visits, varying levels of provider confidence to navigate OUD treatment discussions, structural factors (e.g., schedules, productivity goals) that limited provider time, the role of team-based approaches in lessening discouragement and feelings of burnout, and lack of shared organizational vision for reducing harms from OUD.
While the capacity of PC teams to engage patients in OUD care is influenced across multiple levels, some of the most promising opportunities may involve addressing system-level factors that limit PC team time and collaboration and promoting organizational alignment on goals for OUD treatment.
基层医疗环境中阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)治疗的参与率往往较低。对于基层医疗团队在提供OUD治疗时的经历以及影响他们促使患者参与治疗能力的潜在因素,我们了解甚少。探索基层医疗团队的经历可能会为所需的支持提供信息,从而优化OUD治疗的提供,并改善OUD患者的治疗效果。
我们探讨了多学科基层医疗团队在促使患者参与OUD治疗方面的障碍和促进因素。
采用深入访谈的定性研究。
基层医疗临床团队。
我们对参与OUD治疗的基层医疗团队成员进行了半结构化访谈(n = 35),采用了标准抽样和最大变异抽样相结合的方法进行招募。数据收集和分析以关于患者参与的现有理论文献为依据,具体而言,患者参与受到个体(患者、提供者)、人际(患者 - 提供者)和卫生系统领域等因素的影响。访谈进行了专业转录,并使用基于访谈指南的编码方案进行双重编码,同时允许出现新的编码。使用持续比较法对编码进行迭代审查以确定主题,并与参与者和整个研究团队进行核实。
分析确定了五个影响基层医疗团队有效促使患者参与的主题,包括就诊期间患者联系有限(如电话、短信)、提供者进行OUD治疗讨论的信心程度不同、限制提供者时间的结构因素(如日程安排、生产力目标)、基于团队的方法在减轻挫折感和倦怠感方面的作用,以及缺乏减少OUD危害的共同组织愿景。
虽然基层医疗团队促使患者参与OUD治疗的能力受到多个层面的影响,但一些最有希望的机会可能涉及解决限制基层医疗团队时间和协作的系统层面因素,并促进在OUD治疗目标上的组织一致性。