• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降低 COPD 患者的费用共付额和药物管理服务:一项随机临床试验。

Reduced Cost Sharing and Medication Management Services for COPD: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Oct 1;184(10):1186-1194. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.3499.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.3499
PMID:39073823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11287444/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

High out-of-pocket costs and improper use of maintenance inhalers contribute to poor outcomes among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There is limited evidence for how addressing these barriers could improve adherence and affect COPD exacerbations, spending, or racial disparities in these outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of a national program to reduce beneficiary cost sharing for COPD maintenance inhalers and provide medication management services that included education on proper technique for inhaler use.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial included individuals with COPD. All individuals were enrolled in Medicare Advantage. Data were collected from January 2019 to December 2021, and data were analyzed from January 2023 to May 2024.

INTERVENTION

Invitation to enroll in a program that reduced cost sharing for maintenance inhalers to $0 or $10 and provided medication management services. The random assignment of the invitation was used to estimate the effects of the invitation and program enrollment, overall and by race.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Inhaler adherence measured as proportion of days covered (PDC), moderate-to-severe exacerbations, short-acting inhaler fills, total spending, and as an exploratory outcome, out-of-pocket spending.

RESULTS

Of 19 113 included patients, 55.2% were female; 9.5% were Black, 81.1% were White, and 9.4% were another or unknown race; and the median (IQR) age was 74 (69-80) years. Program enrollment was higher in the invited group (29.4%) than the control group (5.1%). The PDC for maintenance inhalers was higher in the invited group than the control group (32.0% vs 28.4%; adjusted invitation effect, 3.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.1-4.5); the adjusted effect of the program (the local average treatment effect) was 15.5 percentage points (95% CI, 12.8-18.1), a 55% relative increase in adherence. Mean (SD) out-of-pocket spending for prescriptions was lower in the invited group ($619.5 [$863.1]) than the control group ($675.0 [$887.3]; adjusted invitation effect, -$49.5; 95% CI, -68.9 to -30.0; adjusted program effect, -$203.0; 95% CI, -282.8 to -123.2), but there was no statistically significant difference in exacerbations, short-acting inhaler fills, or total spending. Among Black individuals, the adjusted invitation effect on maintenance inhaler PDC was 5.5 percentage points (95% CI, 3.3-7.7), and the adjusted program effect was 19.5 percentage points (95% CI, 12.4-26.7). Among White individuals, the adjusted invitation effect was 3.7 percentage points (95% CI, 2.9-4.4), and the adjusted program effect was 15.1 percentage points (95% CI, 12.1-18.1). The difference between the invitation effects by race was not statistically significant (1.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.5 to 4.1; P = .13).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Individuals in Medicare Advantage who received an invitation to enroll in a program that reduced cost sharing for maintenance inhalers and provided medication management services had higher inhaler adherence compared with the control group. The difference in the program's effect on inhaler adherence between Black and White individuals was substantial but not statistically significant.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05497999.

摘要

重要性

高自付费用和维护性吸入器使用不当导致慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的预后不佳。对于如何解决这些障碍以提高依从性并影响 COPD 加重、支出或这些结果的种族差异,证据有限。

目的

研究一项降低 COPD 维持性吸入器受益方自付费用并提供药物管理服务的国家计划,其中包括适当吸入器使用技术教育。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项随机临床试验,纳入了 COPD 患者。所有患者均参加了医疗保险优势计划。数据于 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月采集,2024 年 1 月至 5 月进行数据分析。

干预措施

邀请参加一项计划,将维持性吸入器的自付费用降低至 0 美元或 10 美元,并提供药物管理服务。邀请的随机分配用于估计邀请和计划参与的效果,总体效果和按种族效果。

主要结果和措施

使用比例天数覆盖(PDC)衡量吸入器的依从性、中度至重度加重、短效吸入器填充、总支出,以及作为探索性结果的自付支出。

结果

在纳入的 19113 名患者中,55.2%为女性;9.5%为黑人,81.1%为白人,9.4%为其他或未知种族;中位数(IQR)年龄为 74(69-80)岁。邀请组的计划参与率(29.4%)高于对照组(5.1%)。与对照组相比,邀请组的维持性吸入器 PDC 更高(32.0%比 28.4%;调整后的邀请效果,3.8 个百分点;95%CI,3.1-4.5);计划的调整效果(局部平均治疗效果)为 15.5 个百分点(95%CI,12.8-18.1),依从性相对增加 55%。邀请组的处方自付支出中位数(SD)较低(619.5 [863.1] 美元),而对照组(675.0 [887.3] 美元)(调整后的邀请效果,-$49.5;95%CI,-68.9 至-30.0;调整后的计划效果,-$203.0;95%CI,-282.8 至-123.2),但在加重、短效吸入器填充或总支出方面无统计学差异。在黑人个体中,维持性吸入器 PDC 的调整后邀请效果为 5.5 个百分点(95%CI,3.3-7.7),调整后的计划效果为 19.5 个百分点(95%CI,12.4-26.7)。在白人个体中,调整后的邀请效果为 3.7 个百分点(95%CI,2.9-4.4),调整后的计划效果为 15.1 个百分点(95%CI,12.1-18.1)。种族间邀请效果的差异无统计学意义(1.8 个百分点;95%CI,-0.5 至 4.1;P = .13)。

结论和相关性

医疗保险优势计划中收到参加降低维持性吸入器自付费用并提供药物管理服务计划邀请的个体与对照组相比,吸入器依从性更高。黑人和白人个体之间计划对吸入器依从性影响的差异虽然显著,但无统计学意义。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT05497999。

相似文献

1
Reduced Cost Sharing and Medication Management Services for COPD: A Randomized Clinical Trial.降低 COPD 患者的费用共付额和药物管理服务:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Oct 1;184(10):1186-1194. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.3499.
2
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
3
Combined corticosteroid and long-acting beta(2)-agonist in one inhaler versus long-acting beta(2)-agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.联合使用皮质类固醇和长效β2受体激动剂的单一吸入器与长效β2受体激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD006829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006829.pub2.
4
Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus combination inhaler maintenance for chronic asthma in adults and children.福莫特罗与布地奈德联合用于成人和儿童慢性哮喘的维持和缓解治疗与联合吸入器维持治疗的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 16;2013(12):CD009019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009019.pub2.
5
Interventions to improve adherence to pharmacological therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).干预措施以提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)药物治疗的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 8;9(9):CD013381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013381.pub2.
6
Effectiveness of Switching from Multiple-Inhaler to Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in Patients with COPD in a Real-World Setting in Japan.在日本真实世界环境中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者从多吸入器治疗转换为每日一次单吸入器三联疗法的有效性。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Mar 8;20:565-580. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S478455. eCollection 2025.
7
Tiotropium versus long-acting beta-agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.噻托溴铵与长效β受体激动剂治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD009157. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009157.pub2.
8
Tiotropium versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.噻托溴铵与安慰剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 21;2014(7):CD009285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009285.pub3.
9
Tiotropium versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.噻托溴铵与安慰剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD009285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009285.pub2.
10
Combined corticosteroid and long-acting beta₂-agonist in one inhaler versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.联合使用皮质类固醇和长效β₂受体激动剂的单一吸入器与安慰剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 10;2013(11):CD003794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003794.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
A survey and analysis of inhalation medication adherence among 977 COPD patients in a region of northern China.中国北方某地区977例慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入药物依从性的调查与分析
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 9;30(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02535-1.
2
A Syndemic Model: COPD, Multimorbidity, and Poverty.一种综合征模型:慢性阻塞性肺疾病、多重疾病与贫困
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024 Sep 27;11(5):437-443. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0558.