Goudie T A, Allan M W, Lonsdale M, Burrow L M, Macrae W A, Grant I S
Anaesthesia. 1985 Nov;40(11):1086-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb10607.x.
A double-blind randomised study of 48 patients in whom continuous subcutaneous infusion and regular intramuscular injection of morphine were compared as analgesic regimens after upper abdominal surgery, is described. Over a 48-hour period, no difference in pain intensity between the two groups was found by comparing linear analogue scores, assessments on a four-point rank scale, peak expiratory flow rates or requirement for additional analgesia. Nausea and sedation were assessed using a four-point rank scale. These side effects were less frequent with subcutaneous infusion (p less than 0.05). Two patients from each group were judged to have received an overdose. The infusion apparatus was simple and convenient to use. Continuous subcutaneous infusion of morphine is a practical and effective means of achieving post-operative analgesia but, as with other mandatory dosing regimens, relative overdosage may occur.
本文描述了一项针对48例患者的双盲随机研究,比较了上腹部手术后持续皮下输注吗啡和常规肌肉注射吗啡这两种镇痛方案。在48小时内,通过比较线性模拟评分、四点等级量表评估、呼气峰值流速或额外镇痛需求,发现两组之间的疼痛强度没有差异。使用四点等级量表评估恶心和镇静情况。皮下输注时这些副作用的发生率较低(p<0.05)。每组有两名患者被判定接受了过量用药。输注装置使用简单且方便。持续皮下输注吗啡是实现术后镇痛的一种实用且有效的方法,但与其他强制给药方案一样,可能会出现相对过量用药的情况。