Suppr超能文献

合作的有害和有益影响对合作频率和合作顺序均敏感,但对编码任务不敏感。

The detrimental and beneficial effects of collaboration are sensitive to both collaborative frequency and collaborative order but not to the encoding task.

作者信息

Nie Aiqing, Liu Si

机构信息

School of Education Science, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan, China.

Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Gen Psychol. 2025 Apr-Jun;152(2):265-305. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2024.2385098. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

Abstract

Extensive attention has been dedicated to studying the influence of others on genuine or false memory during ongoing and post-collaboration. These studies have revealed both detrimental and beneficial effects on episodic memory. Although ongoing effects such as collaborative inhibition have been examined in the semantic situation, the post-collaboration effects have not received the same level of scrutiny To address this gap, the current study instructed participants to either generate or remember idioms during the study phase, which encompassed semantic and episodic encoding. There were three recall sessions, during which four groups were designated: individual (III), preceding collaboration (CII), following collaboration (ICI), and multiple collaboration (CCI). The main results and implications of the study are outlined below. (a) The detrimental effect of collaborative inhibition was found to be sensitive to collaborative frequency, indicating that the contribution of retrieval strategy disruption proposed by the Retrieval Strategy Disruption Hypothesis (RSDH) is conditional. (b) We observed a reliable beneficial effect of error pruning, as evidenced by smaller errors in collaborators compared to individual participants. Furthermore, this beneficial effect was consistently evident in both ongoing and post-collaboration scenarios for the two encoding tasks. (c) The post-collaborative memory benefit was observed in both Recall 2 and Recall 3. This suggests that mechanisms such as relearning, cross-cueing, re-exposure, and pruning errors may have contributed to this effect. (d) The observation of the beneficial effects of picked-up and shared memory indicates the contribution of similar mechanisms as to post-collaborative memory benefit. (e) These effects were observed regardless of the encoding task, but they were influenced by both collaborative frequency and collaborative order. The results are discussed in terms of the RSDH and other relevant theories. Additionally, future research directions are provided.

摘要

人们广泛关注研究他人在合作进行期间及合作后对真实或虚假记忆的影响。这些研究揭示了对情景记忆既有不利影响也有有益影响。尽管诸如协作抑制等进行期间的影响已在语义情境中得到检验,但合作后的影响尚未受到同等程度的审视。为填补这一空白,当前研究指示参与者在学习阶段要么生成要么记住习语,该阶段包括语义和情景编码。有三次回忆测试,在此期间指定了四组:个体组(III)、合作前组(CII)、合作后组(ICI)和多次合作组(CCI)。该研究的主要结果和启示概述如下。(a)发现协作抑制的不利影响对协作频率敏感,这表明检索策略破坏假说(RSDH)提出的检索策略破坏的作用是有条件的。(b)我们观察到错误修剪有可靠的有益效果,与个体参与者相比,合作者的错误更小证明了这一点。此外,在两个编码任务的进行期间和合作后情景中,这种有益效果都始终明显。(c)在回忆2和回忆3中都观察到了合作后记忆益处。这表明诸如重新学习、交叉提示、重新暴露和错误修剪等机制可能促成了这种效果。(d)对提取和共享记忆的有益效果的观察表明,与合作后记忆益处有类似机制的作用。(e)无论编码任务如何,都观察到了这些效果,但它们受到协作频率和协作顺序的影响。根据RSDH和其他相关理论对结果进行了讨论。此外,还提供了未来的研究方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验