Desai Imtiaz, Wewege Michael A, Jones Matthew D, Clifford Briana K, Pandit Anurag, Kaakoush Nadeem O, Simar David, Hagstrom Amanda D
School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; and.
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Oct 1;38(10):1813-1821. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004862. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
Desai, I, Wewege, MA, Jones, MD, Clifford, BK, Pandit, A, Kaakoush, NO, Simar, D, and Hagstrom, AD. The effect of creatine supplementation on resistance training-based changes to body composition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 38(10): 1813-1821, 2024-The purpose of this review was to determine the added effect of creatine supplementation on changes in body composition with resistance training in adults younger than 50 years. The review protocol was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/x48a6/). Our primary outcome was lean body mass (LBM); secondary outcomes were body fat percentage (%) and body fat mass (kg). We performed a random-effects meta-analysis in R using the metafor package. Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the effects of training status and use of a carbohydrate drink with creatine. We conducted a meta-regression to examine the moderating effect of total training volume. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. One thousand six hundred ninety-four records were screened, and 67 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. Fifty-two percentages of the studies had low risk, 41% some concerns, and 7% high risk of bias. Compared with resistance training (RT) alone, creatine supplementation increased LBM by 1.14 kg (95% CI 0.69 to 1.59), and reduced body fat percentage by -0.88% (95% CI -1.66 to -0.11) and body fat mass by -0.73 kg (95% CI -1.34 to -0.11). There were no differences between training status or carbohydrate subgroups. Training volume was not associated with effect size in all outcomes; 7 g or 0.3 g/kg of body mass of creatine per day is likely to increase LBM by 1 kg and reduce fat mass by 0.7 kg more than RT alone. Concurrent carbohydrate ingestion did not enhance the hypertrophy benefits of creatine.
德赛,I;韦韦格,MA;琼斯,MD;克利福德,BK;潘迪特,A;卡库什,NO;西马尔,D;哈格斯特罗姆,AD。补充肌酸对基于抗阻训练的身体成分变化的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。《力量与体能研究杂志》38(10): 1813 - 1821,2024年——本综述的目的是确定补充肌酸对50岁以下成年人抗阻训练后身体成分变化的额外影响。该综述方案已在开放科学框架(osf.io/x48a6/)上预先注册。我们的主要结果是去脂体重(LBM);次要结果是体脂百分比(%)和体脂质量(kg)。我们在R中使用metafor软件包进行随机效应荟萃分析。进行亚组分析以检查训练状态和与肌酸一起使用碳水化合物饮料的影响。我们进行了元回归以检查总训练量的调节作用。统计学显著性设定为p < 0.05。筛选了1694条记录,评估了67篇全文文章的 eligibility。12项研究纳入荟萃分析。52%的研究风险较低,41%存在一些担忧,7%存在高偏倚风险。与单独的抗阻训练(RT)相比,补充肌酸使去脂体重增加1.14 kg(95%置信区间0.69至1.59),体脂百分比降低 -0.88%(95%置信区间 -1.66至 -0.11),体脂质量降低 -0.73 kg(95%置信区间 -1.34至 -0.11)。训练状态或碳水化合物亚组之间没有差异。训练量与所有结果的效应大小均无关;每天7 g或0.3 g/kg体重的肌酸可能比单独的抗阻训练使去脂体重增加1 kg,脂肪质量减少0.7 kg。同时摄入碳水化合物并未增强肌酸的肥大益处。 (注:原文中“67 full - text articles were assessed for eligibility”这里的“eligibility”未准确翻译,可根据上下文理解为“是否符合纳入标准”之类的意思,但按要求未添加解释说明,直接保留原文词。)