Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom (S.R.K., P.G.C.).
York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom (P.T., A.K., C.A., M.W., S.J.R., C.H., D.J.T.).
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Sep;177(9):1145-1156. doi: 10.7326/M24-0303. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
Treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) are limited. Previous small studies suggest that the antirheumatic drug methotrexate may be a potential treatment for OA pain.
To assess symptomatic benefits of methotrexate in knee OA (KOA).
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done between 13 June 2014 and 13 October 2017. (ISRCTN77854383; EudraCT: 2013-001689-41).
15 secondary care musculoskeletal clinics in the United Kingdom.
A total of 207 participants with symptomatic, radiographic KOA and knee pain (severity ≥4 out of 10) on most days in the past 3 months with inadequate response to current medication were approached for inclusion.
Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral methotrexate once weekly (6-week escalation 10 to 25 mg) or matched placebo over 12 months and continued usual analgesia.
The primary end point was average knee pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] 0 to 10) at 6 months, with 12-month follow-up to assess longer-term response. Secondary end points included knee stiffness and function outcomes and adverse events (AEs).
A total of 155 participants (64% women; mean age, 60.9 years; 50% Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 to 4) were randomly assigned to methotrexate ( = 77) or placebo ( = 78). Follow-up was 86% ( = 134; methotrexate: 66, placebo: 68) at 6 months. Mean knee pain decreased from 6.4 (SD, 1.80) at baseline to 5.1 (SD, 2.32) at 6 months in the methotrexate group and from 6.8 (SD, 1.62) to 6.2 (SD, 2.30) in the placebo group. The primary intention-to-treat analysis showed a statistically significant pain reduction of 0.79 NRS points in favor of methotrexate (95% CI, 0.08 to 1.51; = 0.030). There were also statistically significant treatment group differences in favor of methotrexate at 6 months for Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index stiffness (0.60 points [CI, 0.01 to 1.18]; = 0.045) and function (5.01 points [CI, 1.29 to 8.74]; = 0.008). Treatment adherence analysis supported a dose-response effect. Four unrelated serious AEs were reported (methotrexate: 2, placebo: 2).
Not permitting oral methotrexate to be changed to subcutaneous delivery for intolerance.
Oral methotrexate added to usual medications demonstrated statistically significant reduction in KOA pain, stiffness, and function at 6 months.
Versus Arthritis.
治疗骨关节炎(OA)的方法有限。之前的一些小型研究表明,抗风湿药甲氨蝶呤可能是治疗 OA 疼痛的潜在方法。
评估甲氨蝶呤治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)的症状改善效果。
一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,于 2014 年 6 月 13 日至 2017 年 10 月 13 日进行。(ISRCTN77854383;EudraCT:2013-001689-41)。
英国 15 家二级保健肌肉骨骼诊所。
共纳入 207 名患有症状性、放射学 KOA 和膝关节疼痛(过去 3 个月中大多数日子疼痛严重程度≥4/10)且对当前药物治疗反应不足的患者。
参与者被随机分配 1:1 接受每周一次的口服甲氨蝶呤(6 周内从 10 毫克逐渐增加至 25 毫克)或匹配的安慰剂,持续 12 个月,并继续使用常规镇痛药。
主要终点为 6 个月时平均膝关节疼痛(数字评分量表 [NRS] 0 到 10),并在 12 个月时进行随访以评估长期反应。次要终点包括膝关节僵硬和功能结果以及不良事件(AE)。
共有 155 名参与者(64%为女性;平均年龄 60.9 岁;50%的 Kellgren-Lawrence 分级为 3 到 4 级)被随机分配至甲氨蝶呤(n=77)或安慰剂(n=78)组。6 个月时的随访率为 86%(n=134;甲氨蝶呤组 66 例,安慰剂组 68 例)。甲氨蝶呤组的膝关节疼痛从基线时的 6.4(SD,1.80)降至 6 个月时的 5.1(SD,2.32),安慰剂组从 6.8(SD,1.62)降至 6.2(SD,2.30)。主要意向治疗分析显示,甲氨蝶呤组疼痛减轻 0.79 NRS 点具有统计学意义(95%CI,0.08 至 1.51;=0.030)。在 6 个月时,甲氨蝶呤组在 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数的僵硬(0.60 点[CI,0.01 至 1.18];=0.045)和功能(5.01 点[CI,1.29 至 8.74];=0.008)方面也有统计学意义的治疗组差异。治疗依从性分析支持剂量反应效应。报告了 4 例无关的严重不良事件(甲氨蝶呤组 2 例,安慰剂组 2 例)。
不允许因不耐受而将口服甲氨蝶呤改为皮下注射。
与常规药物治疗相比,口服甲氨蝶呤可显著减轻 KOA 的疼痛、僵硬和功能障碍,其效果在 6 个月时更为明显。
关节炎对抗组织。