• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Fetal and Maternal Factors Predictive of Primary Cesarean Delivery at Term in a Low-Risk Population: NICHD Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons.低风险人群足月原发性剖宫产的胎儿和母体预测因素:美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长研究 - 单胎妊娠
Am J Perinatol. 2025 Jan;42(2):256-267. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788274. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age.比较 Hadlock 胎儿生长标准与 Eunice Kennedy Shriver 国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所的种族/民族标准,以预测新生儿发病率和小于胎龄儿。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):474.e1-474.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
3
Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.比较美国队列中基于人群的胎儿生长标准。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep;231(3):338.e1-338.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.034. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
4
Blinded ultrasound fetal biometry at 36 weeks and risk of emergency Cesarean delivery in a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women.前瞻性队列研究低危初产妇中 36 孕周盲法超声胎儿生物测量与急诊剖宫产的关系。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):78-86. doi: 10.1002/uog.17513. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
5
Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use?胎儿生长受限和小于胎龄儿作为新生儿发病率的预测因素:应该使用哪种生长曲线?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec;229(6):678.e1-678.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.035. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.一项针对非裔美国女性的新定制胎儿生长标准:PRB/NICHD 底特律研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S679-S691.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.229.
7
Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.胎儿生物测量预测不良围产结局:定制标准与基于人群标准的比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;55(2):177-188. doi: 10.1002/uog.20299.
8
Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study.足月初产妇剖宫产预测:前瞻性多中心 Genesis 研究结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):598.e1-598.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Dichorionic twin trajectories: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.双绒毛膜双胎的生长轨迹:美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):221.e1-221.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.044. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
10
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 32 and 36 weeks.预测 35-37 孕周的小于胎龄儿:母亲因素的影响和 32-36 孕周间的生长速度。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;53(5):630-637. doi: 10.1002/uog.20267. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Births: Final Data for 2021.出生情况:2021年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023 Jan;72(1):1-53.
2
The limits of small-for-gestational-age as a high-risk category.小胎龄儿作为高危类别存在局限性。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;36(10):985-991. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00810-z. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
Trends in Differences in Health Status and Health Care Access and Affordability by Race and Ethnicity in the United States, 1999-2018.1999-2018 年美国种族和民族之间健康状况和医疗保健可及性及可负担性差异的趋势。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 17;326(7):637-648. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.9907.
4
The Association between Maternal Experiences of Interpersonal Discrimination and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.孕产妇人际歧视经历与不良分娩结局之间的关联:证据的系统综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 4;18(4):1465. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041465.
5
Routine third-trimester ultrasound in low-risk pregnancies and perinatal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低危妊娠中常规的孕晚期超声检查与围产儿死亡:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Nov;2(4):100242. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100242. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
6
Using Electronic Health Record and Administrative Data to Analyze Maternal and Neonatal Delivery Complications.利用电子健康记录和管理数据分析产妇和新生儿分娩并发症。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Nov;46(11):623-630. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
7
Effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasonography to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in low risk pregnancy (the IRIS study): nationwide, pragmatic, multicentre, stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.常规孕晚期超声检查降低低危妊娠不良围产结局的效果(IRIS 研究):全国性、实用主义、多中心、阶梯式楔形集群随机试验。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 15;367:l5517. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5517.
8
Sonographic Estimated Fetal Weight and Cesarean Delivery among Nulliparous Women with Obesity.肥胖初产妇的超声估计胎儿体重与剖宫产
AJP Rep. 2019 Apr;9(2):e127-e132. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1684035. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
9
Association of Maternal Obesity With Longitudinal Ultrasonographic Measures of Fetal Growth: Findings From the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons.母亲肥胖与胎儿生长的纵向超声测量指标的关联:来自 NICHD 胎儿生长研究-单胎的研究结果。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Jan 1;172(1):24-31. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3785.
10
Cohort Profile: NICHD Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons and Twins.队列简介:美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长发育研究——单胎与双胎研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 1;47(1):25-25l. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx161.

低风险人群足月原发性剖宫产的胎儿和母体预测因素:美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长研究 - 单胎妊娠

Fetal and Maternal Factors Predictive of Primary Cesarean Delivery at Term in a Low-Risk Population: NICHD Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons.

作者信息

Mateus Julio, Stevens Danielle R, Grantz Katherine L, Zhang Cuilin, Grewal Jagteshwar, Grobman William A, Owen John, Sciscione Anthony C, Wapner Ronald J, Skupski Daniel, Chien Edward, Wing Deborah A, Ranzini Angela C, Nageotte Michael P, Newman Roger B

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina.

Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2025 Jan;42(2):256-267. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788274. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788274
PMID:39074807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11693481/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine associations of fetal biometric and amniotic fluid measures with intrapartum primary cesarean delivery (PCD) and develop prediction models for PCD based on ultrasound parameters and maternal factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of the National Institute of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Fetal Growth Studies-singleton cohort (2009-2013) including patients with uncomplicated pregnancies and intent to deliver vaginally at ≥37 weeks. The estimated fetal weight, individual biometric parameters, fetal asymmetry measurements, and amniotic fluid single deepest vertical pocket assessed at the final scan (mean 37.5 ± 1.9 weeks) were categorized as <10th, 10th to 90th (reference), and >90th percentiles. Logistic regression analyses examined the association between the ultrasound measures and PCD. Fetal and maternal SuperLearner prediction algorithms were constructed for the full and nulliparous cohorts.

RESULTS

Of the 1,668 patients analyzed, 249 (14.9%) had PCD. The fetal head circumference, occipital-frontal diameter, and transverse abdominal diameter >90th percentile (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.50, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.39, 4.51; aOR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.02, 3.40; and aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.16, 3.89, respectively) were associated with PCD. The fetal model demonstrated poor ability to predict PCD in the full cohort and in nulliparous patients (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.61; and AUC = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.60, respectively). Conversely, the maternal model had better predictive capability overall (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.82) and in the nulliparous subgroup (AUC = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.77). Models combining maternal/fetal factors performed similarly to the maternal model (AUC = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.82 in full cohort, and AUC = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.76 in nulliparas).

CONCLUSION

Although a few fetal biometric parameters were associated with PCD, the fetal prediction model had low performance. In contrast, the maternal model had a fair-to-good ability to predict PCD.

KEY POINTS

· Fetal HC >90th percentile was associated with cesarean delivery.. · Fetal parameters did not effectively predict PCD.. · Maternal factors were more predictive of PCD.. · Maternal/fetal and maternal models performed similarly.. · Prediction models had lower performance in nulliparas..

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨胎儿生物测量指标和羊水测量指标与产时初次剖宫产(PCD)之间的关联,并基于超声参数和母体因素建立PCD预测模型。

研究设计

对尤妮斯·肯尼迪·施赖弗国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所(NICHD)胎儿生长研究单胎队列(2009 - 2013年)进行二次分析,纳入妊娠无并发症且计划在≥37周时经阴道分娩的患者。在最后一次扫描(平均孕周37.5±1.9周)时评估的估计胎儿体重、个体生物测量参数、胎儿不对称测量值以及羊水最大深度单垂直径被分为低于第10百分位数、第10至第90百分位数(参考值)和高于第90百分位数。逻辑回归分析检验超声测量指标与PCD之间的关联。为整个队列和初产妇队列构建胎儿和母体超学习预测算法。

结果

在分析的1668例患者中,249例(14.9%)发生PCD。胎儿头围、枕额径和腹横径高于第90百分位数(校正比值比[aOR]分别为2.50,95%置信区间[95%CI]:1.39,4.51;aOR = 1.86,95%CI:1.02,3.40;aOR = 2.13,95%CI:1.16,3.89)与PCD相关。胎儿模型在整个队列和初产妇中预测PCD的能力较差(受试者操作特征曲线下面积[AUC]分别为0.56,95%CI:0.52,0.61;AUC = 0.54,95%CI:0.49,0.60)。相反,母体模型总体上具有更好的预测能力(AUC = 0.79,95%CI:0.75,0.82),在初产妇亚组中也是如此(AUC = 0.72,95%CI:0.67,0.77)。结合母体/胎儿因素的模型表现与母体模型相似(在整个队列中AUC = 0.78,95%CI:0.75,0.82,在初产妇中AUC = 0.71,95%CI:0.66,0.76)。

结论

虽然一些胎儿生物测量参数与PCD相关,但胎儿预测模型性能较低。相比之下,母体模型具有较好至良好的PCD预测能力。

关键点

·胎儿头围高于第90百分位数与剖宫产相关。·胎儿参数不能有效预测PCD。·母体因素对PCD的预测性更强。·母体/胎儿模型和母体模型表现相似。·预测模型在初产妇中的性能较低。