Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Oct 7;34(10):1485-1492. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005746.
The 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system includes lymphovascular invasion quantification as a staging criterion for endometrioid endometrial carcinomas; no lymphovascular invasion and focal invasion (≤4 vessels involved) are grouped as one category, and substantial invasion as another.
To assess the association between lymphovascular invasion and oncologic outcomes.
We retrospectively identified patients with FIGO 2009 stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer treated surgically with total hysterectomy and lymph node assessment at two tertiary care centers between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019. Lymphovascular space invasion was categorized as focal (<5 vessels involved), substantial (≥5 vessels involved), and no lymphovascular invasion using WHO criteria.
Of 1555 patients included, 65 (4.2%) had substantial, 119 (7.7%) had focal, and 1371 (88.2%) had no lymphovascular invasion. Median age was 64 years (range 24-92). Thirty-five patients (53.8%) with substantial, 44 (37%) with focal, and 115 (8.4%) with no lymphovascular invasion had stage IB disease (p<0.001); 21 (32.3%) with substantial, 24 (20.2%) with focal, and 91 (6.6%) with no lymphovascular invasion had grade 3 disease (p<0.001). Thirty-six patients (55.4%) with substantial, 80 (67.2%) with focal, and 207 (15.1%) with no lymphovascular invasion received adjuvant treatment (p<0.001). Median follow-up was 61.5 months (range 0.8-133.9). Five-year progression-free survival rates were 68.7% (substantial), 70.5% (focal), and 90.7% (no invasion) (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, any lymphovascular invasion was associated with increased risk of progression/death (adjusted HR (aHR)=1.84 (95% CI 1.73 to 1.96) for focal; 2.17 (95% CI 1.96 to 2.39) for substantial). Compared with focal, substantial lymphovascular invasion was associated with an aHR for disease progression of 1.18 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.39).
Focal and substantial lymphovascular invasion were associated with increased risk of disease progression and do not appear to be prognostically distinct. Focal versus no lymphovascular invasion have different prognostic outcomes and should not be combined into one category.
2023 年国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期系统将淋巴管侵犯量化作为子宫内膜样腺癌的分期标准;无淋巴管侵犯和局灶性侵犯(<4 个脉管受累)归入一类,广泛侵犯归入另一类。
评估淋巴管侵犯与肿瘤结局的关系。
我们回顾性分析了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日在两家三级医疗中心接受手术治疗的 FIGO 2009 期 I 子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌患者,手术包括全子宫切除术和淋巴结评估。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)标准,淋巴管侵犯分为局灶性(<5 个脉管受累)、广泛(≥5 个脉管受累)和无淋巴管侵犯。
在 1555 例患者中,65 例(4.2%)有广泛侵犯,119 例(7.7%)有局灶性侵犯,1371 例(88.2%)无淋巴管侵犯。中位年龄为 64 岁(范围 24-92 岁)。35 例(53.8%)有广泛侵犯、44 例(37%)有局灶性侵犯和 115 例(8.4%)无淋巴管侵犯的患者为 IB 期疾病(p<0.001);21 例(32.3%)有广泛侵犯、24 例(20.2%)有局灶性侵犯和 91 例(6.6%)无淋巴管侵犯的患者为 3 级疾病(p<0.001)。36 例(55.4%)有广泛侵犯、80 例(67.2%)有局灶性侵犯和 207 例(15.1%)无淋巴管侵犯的患者接受了辅助治疗(p<0.001)。中位随访时间为 61.5 个月(范围 0.8-133.9 个月)。5 年无进展生存率分别为 68.7%(广泛侵犯)、70.5%(局灶性侵犯)和 90.7%(无侵犯)(p<0.001)。多因素分析显示,任何淋巴管侵犯均与进展/死亡风险增加相关(局灶性侵犯的调整 HR(aHR)为 1.84(95%CI 1.73-1.96);广泛侵犯的 aHR 为 2.17(95%CI 1.96-2.39))。与局灶性侵犯相比,广泛侵犯与疾病进展的 aHR 为 1.18(95%CI 1.00-1.39)。
局灶性和广泛淋巴管侵犯与疾病进展风险增加相关,似乎没有预后差异。局灶性与无淋巴管侵犯具有不同的预后结局,不应归入同一类别。